Uncyclopedia:VFH/Creepy guy who lives across the street

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Creepy guy who lives across the street (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Creepy guy who lives across the street	Score: 12 creepy guys
Nominated by:	Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
For: 17.5	Nom and For: I noticed a while back that this is one of the few articles in the Neighbors series that had yet to be featured. So, let's give it a chance. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC) For. The crap publications get their share in this. If the idea is old (I haven't read all articles in here), I don't mind: this one's well written.– Preceding unsigned comment added by multiliteralist (talk • contribs) For. 99.242.223.161 14:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC) For. 67.34.120.180 23:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC) For. I like how Creepy Guy is bolded every time. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:59, Sep 25 For. Amy Rose 17:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC) For. 81.191.196.139 19:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC) For. --InsomniJack 08:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC) For --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC) For. 146.115.115.49 03:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC) For. a bit late but still.... ~ 11:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC) For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC) For. reminds me a lot of The_Enigmatic_Mr._Grumpikins. Not as good, but still a nice one. Midget 19:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Weak for. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 09:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC) For. 24.164.72.248 17:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC) For. Clever, subtle, featureworthy. 72.1.195.8 23:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)  For. JudgeZarbi TALK 13:56, 12 October 2008 (UTC) For. Sure, why not! Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 17:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC) For. I like the bold word creepy guy 24.3.151.127 20:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC) For. Cuntywunty 23:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC) For. Ya! to join the other's in the neighborhood who have also been the VFH'd Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 5.5	against. i like the concept of the narrator stalking the 'creepy guy', thus making the narrator more creepy than the 'creepy guy', but i really didn't think it was drawn out as well as it could have been. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)  Against. - As per Gerry — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Against. Writer is missing a golden opportunity to be ironic and BE even creepier than the creepy guy he is writing about. Discussions about how the person is creepy is merely cursory and glosses over various excuses. The lack of specifics in certain sections serve to weaken the article even more. The paragraph on the Lights is just extraneous at this point, it doesn't marks the guy as creepy and more likely as bored. Overall the article lacks enough focus on the topic. Quasispace 06:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Meh Per the three above me. And I also don't mind if an idea has been done before, but this one really doesn't bring anything new to the table. See my first sentence. -RAHB 22:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Against. Per the above, really - not bad, but could be much betterer, and doesn't strike me as front page material. --UU - natter 09:27, Oct 6 Against. 70.137.140.29 23:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments	hmmm...not that good, still okay, but I guess its not that good to be on VFH? Linqi.linqi 14:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC) VFH is an evil force on our site and some weaker articles are often featured. However we aim to have our featured content as a kind of "Best of":) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Comment. I agree with both sides of the argument, so I'm gonna abstain. Velosi-T {] Screech * Vomit * Mutilations [} 21:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.