From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: 9-11 according to a 5 year old
|
Score: 7.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
All rise for Acmed2 (talk) 19:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
|
For: 12
|
 For and nom. All rise for Acmed2 (talk) 19:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)- For. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 20:34 20 May 2013
- For. I love these articles InMooseWeTrust (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 Boner. -RAHB 03:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)- For. RIP Lollipop ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 08:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. Lollipop deserves this. And I loved the part 'imaginary friend Jesus'! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz
 08:53, 6 June, 2013 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:34, 9 June 2013
- For. YES. Or else.!!
 Sir Peasewhizz ... Biblio . HOS . Awards 16:50 6.20.13
- "but how cud sumwun be smart and be in the wor??" That quote will haunt me till the day I die. Lord Scofield Stark 08:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. This was hilarious! I especially liked the part where the kid says, "I have to go take a poopy. I must remember to wipe this time!" --
 the dorky contralto    15:34, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. Nice. Me, You, You, talk to me >^.^< 22:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. Funny. But Cute. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 19:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Against: 4.5
|
- Against -- The Zombiebaron 23:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 Against. It doesn't seem like it's by a five-year-old - just a dyslexic. It's really hard to read. Hyperbole (talk) 17:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)- Felt like a 20-year-old trying to write like a 5-year-old, and not all that well. There are ways to do this sort of article really well, but this one didn't tickle my funny bone, or something. The Woodburninator
 Minimal Effort ™
 It STINKS! -- Kip the Egg  Talk Works 13:52, Jun. 27, 2013- Against. 5-year olds should watch Sesame Street. Sesame Street addresses important issues to kids. 174.138.208.39 13:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Comment. I feel conflicted, on one hand; I think it's a decent article but not feature material while on the other hand, it's somewhat brilliant. RedHot (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)- Comment. I might vote for but for one thing: why give the joke away in the title? Style
 Guide 09:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For and nom. 
Against. It doesn't seem like it's by a five-year-old - just a dyslexic. It's really hard to read. 
Comment. I feel conflicted, on one hand; I think it's a decent article but not feature material while on the other hand, it's somewhat brilliant. 
