Forum:Vote: shock images on IRC

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Vote: shock images on IRC

Note: This topic has been unedited for 3784 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

There was apparently once a rule that shock images weren't allowed on IRC, but Zombiebaron decided for some reason that there wasn't, and shock images are fairly common, particularly this one. There appears to be some disagreement over whether shock images are ok, so let's hold a vote rather than just yelling at each other I guess. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:08, 1 Jul 2014

Vote

Score: Voting is evil and worthless. Don't do it.

"Don't vote" is a Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is an oligarchy, run the Cabal. Uncyclopedia is mob rule, aka democracy, and we vote. And it is good. IMO. Snarglefoop (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I still like pie. Too bad. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:39, 2 Jul 2014

For a rule against shock images (or for marking them as such). I don't totally understand everything that goes on with them, but I do know that I hate them, particularly that one, and I'm reasonably sure Matthlock and Bizzeebeever would agree - and I don't understand why people think they're fun to post, particularly not why someone who seems reasonably intelligent and goes to church would also be the one posting disgusting pictures of people doing stupid stuff with poop. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:08, 1 Jul 2014
Boner for poopdick. — S G 1|Hereish ^{[citation needed]} 21:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
For. I don't see their value anywhere, frankly. (Except maybe as fetish images but that's something else again.) Snarglefoop (talk) 21:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Also for a rule against shock images. I find the one SG1|Hereish posts repeatedly disturbing. While I have no problem with freewill, he is pushing the limit with a picture that is neither entertaining nor worthy of existing. I beg you to say no to shockers. I don't agree with the church stuff Llwy said, per se, but she illustrates fine points here. Put your foot down and say no. User:Matthlock/sig2 21:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Abstain. Really don't give a fuck even though I hate poop dicks. I just thought I was obliged to be on Llwy's side. User:Matthlock/sig2 00:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
  - Do whatever you want. You're only obliged to be on your own side. I thought you would want a rule, but if you don't care, fine. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:17, 2 Jul 2014
Ah nuts -- either conflict me or don't, but don't conflict me and whack my edit and then put it back as soon as I finish voting again! And then you've got to give me breathing space to get in and fix my double vote! arrrrgh.... Snarglefoop (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
))<>(( for ever and ever Madclaw *@ ^talk 21:16, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
There is absolutely no way to enforce such a policy. Firstly we would have to define "shock image". There are many things that some people find shocking that others find normal. Who are we to decide what is normal? And if we were to decide what is "normal" who are we then to censor our peers? We left Wikia to escape censorship. There is a very good method for avoiding accidentally clicking a link and getting shocked: Do NOT click any links. -- The Zombiebaron 22:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Actually it's not quite as clear cut as you're making it sound, IMHO. The issue isn't images which are defined by some court or something to have "no redeeming social value" or whatever the criterion would be. The issue is images which folks in this community post with the explicit purpose of shocking other folks in this community who click on them. As you point out there is no way to enforce such a "policy", as in "You violated rule 733b and now we'll break your fingers"; instead it would have to take the form of "Please don't post images which you think are shock images." Hardly bulletproof, but also far from meaningless, and also not exactly the sort of Draconian censorship Wikia has been guilty of. I mean, seriously, is the dude with poop in the wrong place (and the raging bladder infection, if he doesn't load up on antibiotics) getting posted because the posters think it's educational or something? Naaaaa, they know exactly what they're doing... Snarglefoop (talk) 23:07, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
How about 'Please don't post images that the ops think are shock images'? What if someone tells you to click a link, and you fear it would be rude not to? What if you ask what it is and are cleverly told a half-truth or complete lie that it is not a shock image? I'm quite sure I as an 'administrator' am supposed to find it funny to post shock images and to watch people's reactions, but I don't. I can't sympathise with anyone who finds annoying people to be funny. I am thoroughly annoyed and I wish you would recognise that you are driving people away from the channel and that this is not funny one bit. Keep in mind also that this is a place where new and blocked users go to get help. Everyone who advocates posting shock images is IMHO being extremely selfish. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:13, 1 Jul 2014
Or something even waterier: "Don't post images which you think will be perceived as shock images" with the punishment being "Someone will object, and quote this policy". This is a social forum, not a bank, and the issue is bad manners, not bank robbery. Snarglefoop (talk) 23:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
And on the note of driving people away and pitting them against each other: What the hell happened to the sense of community that's supposed to be associated with IRC? When I was persuaded by Zombiebaron to start using IRC, his argument was that it's a place where the community comes together and gets closer or somesuch. These images do nothing, I repeat, nothing to help that. They only make it worse. Can't you see that?! Oh dear, I'm yelling. Please, please listen to me or I'll go mad. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:20, 1 Jul 2014
Well, clearly the majority of the community doesn't have a problem with it. Until you started this vote we never even voted on it, people just started posting images in IRC and literally nobody cared. What you see on IRC is the community and if you want to ostracize yourself from it that's really your own business but once again let me recommend not clicking links. -- The Zombiebaron 23:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm as much a part of this community as anyone else, and I don't see the majority you refer to; the score is 0. If I decide to leave IRC because of something someone else did that was designed to shock and offend, whose fault is it? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:26, 2 Jul 2014
The majority I refer to is literally every other user who accidentally clicked a shock link and then didn't start a vote about it. I don't really understand your question. Whose fault is it that you left somewhere because you were offended by something you perceived to be offensive? You left of your own accord based on an opinion that is your own. It's your fault that you left. -- The Zombiebaron 00:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
a) Having an opinion on something does not necessarily translate into deciding to start a vote on it. b) It was intended to be offensive, as I explicitly said. It's your fault that you didn't understand my question. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:41, 2 Jul 2014
You were not forced to leave, you were not forced to be offended. Both of those are choices you made for yourself. -- The Zombiebaron 01:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Neutral. Yeah, I don't care for Poopdick. But I'm not going to enact a rule to prevent "shock images". I'm just gonna kindly request that people knock it the fuck off. That goes for Mr-Ex's "hive tits" and shokushu goukan, just as much as Poopdick. Also, please Jesus, don't click any links on this page. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 1 '14 23:19 (UTC)
K. J F C 11:12. Jul 2

Or on IRC. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 1 '14 23:19 (UTC)
Or in your emails. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 1 '14 23:20 (UTC)
Or on the Internet. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 1 '14 23:20 (UTC)
Or in man pages. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 1 '14 23:21 (UTC)
Links in .nfo files from torrents are probably bad too. Shouldn't click those, either. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 1 '14 23:21 (UTC)
Bloody hell, 'kindly requesting' won't do a rat's ear of good. You have to stand up for your beliefs. Don't let them try to crucify you. And quit bloody edit conflicting me. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:21, 1 Jul 2014
I'm sorry, did you accidentally mistake me for somebody who stands up for stuff? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 1 '14 23:22 (UTC)
No, I mistook you for someone who should stand up for stuff because he's often right. And I don't believe I'm mistaken about that. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:33, 1 Jul 2014
Against having a rule - First of all, 99% of the time the user linking the shock image warns the entire channel it's a shock image, so in these cases if you click it even after being warned, it's your own fault for ignoring the warning. Second of all is that there is nothing legally wrong with shock images, this isn't bestiality or child porn we're having a vote on, these are just disgusting images that are accessible on many many sites. We're all adults/teenagers not children, deal with it honestly. Third of all is, as Zombiebaron pointed out, policing it. I can certainly say that almost every channel operator (a few exceptions) could not give a single fuck what you link to on IRC as long it's legal (a.k.a not bestiality/CP/viruses and other gay shit) and you aren't spamming it with malicious intent. Fourth of all, I don't get the actually problem here, we're not saying "LET'S BE LIKE ED AND ALLOW SHOCK PORN ALL OVER THE WIKI!", no we're just saying it should be ok on IRC. IRC is a chatroom where most of it's users have known each other for years, throwing people out on their arse because you got offended by an image is nothing short of childish. If you don't like shock images, then get off the internet frankly, you will encounter them MANY times online outside of a single IRC chatroom. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
For the record, not really a fan of them, but I just don't care/see why it matters if people link them just for a joke. This site is meant to be about jokes. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, well, 99% of the time you aren't on IRC, so you shouldn't act like you know anything about this issue. I don't suppose you read what I said above, since you are so firm in your (rather offensive) belief that 'nobody cares'. A good chunk of the time the user does not warn anyone and sometimes even says that it is not a shock image as I said above in case you didn't bother reading which you probably didn't. In response to throwing people out on their arse, you don't seem to realise that the people who are actually getting thrown out are the dissenters. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:31, 1 Jul 2014

Hold on just a gosh darn minute here.... There's something indecent about Beastiality?! Oh God.... This changes everything... The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 23:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Also, I'm not sure of the validity of Frosty's argument because I said that I would be fine with a rule allowing exactly the kind of behaviour he claims is the norm, particularly as this was the actual rule until Zombiebaron unilaterally decided it didn't exist. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:49, 1 Jul 2014
Actually, what I removed was an ugly bold sentence warning that people would be banned for posting any sort of pornography on IRC. As an IRC admin for nearly a decade I can say with certainty that I have never banned anybody for posting pornography, so clearly the statement I removed was a lie. If we need a guideline for what is acceptable in IRC it should be factual. -- The Zombiebaron 23:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
My vote is not a fact, Llwy, it is an opinion. It's an opinion just as valid as your's. The difference between you and I, is not the fact I don't get shocked by shock images like you do (I get shocked just as much as everyone else), it's the fact that I can laugh at the fact I willfully clicked a link to which I had a reaction. It's far easier to just shrug it off than get all upset about it everytime it happens. I used to get upset (around 2011), but then I realized who cares? It's not the end of the world, shrug it off and laugh at yourself. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
I was referring to the statement '99% of the time the user linking the shock image warns the entire channel it's a shock image' which you stated as a fact. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:17, 2 Jul 2014
That part certainly is fact. You seem to have forgotten I've been on this site since 2010, in that time I have seen very few links to NSFW material that didn't carry a warning. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:20, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
2010 is not very recent. In 2014, which is the year that matters right now, you are not usually on IRC, and I am, so I would know more about the subject than you. But more to the point, I don't have a problem with it if people give a warning, which was the original point of my comment. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:26, 2 Jul 2014
Could it be, you and I are in two completely different time zones and as a result the hours you are on IRC I am asleep? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
That or vice versa is certainly possible, yes. Maybe people just happen to mark their links as NSFW when you're awake. The stats page seems to say I at least talk more than you do, though. Also, isn't it a little ironic that an ED admin of all people claims to be shocked by shock images? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:36, 2 Jul 2014
I say less than you? So what? Maybe I do other things and don't have a really high score in trivia (like you do). Using Dramatica as an argument is pretty much clutching at straws, these is more to ED than shock porn and anyone who thinks otherwise is misinformed. Some of it's shock porn and other stuff we wouldn't allow, but some of it is good genuinely hilarious satire with a community just like this one. I don't hang around ED for shock porn and even if I did, you don't magically become desensitized to it. Also: For the record, I admin ED and Uncyc as it also vastly helped the sites stop shitting all over one another with gay circle jerks and "wars". Since I became an admin on both, we have all but left each other alone and gotten along. Ain't that great? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
---->YES Snarglefoop (talk) 03:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
By 'talk less' I meant you are probably there less, which means that you have less opportunity to see what goes on. I was not using Dramatica as any kind of argument, I was trying to make a joke. Don't we do jokes here? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:47, 2 Jul 2014
By the way you've been carrying on about what was a joke, I really don't know anymore. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
That did occur to me... the trouble is that we don't all agree on what a joke is. It's impossible to agree, on that or on anything, so we might as well just give up now and let the whole world descend into anarchy. Hey, anarchy probably works better than North Korea, so it's for the best, right? Trouble is, though, you get these people who think they're admins or something, and they cause all the trouble. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:55, 2 Jul 2014
That already is the rule. All NSFW links are supposed to be labelled as such^[1]. Folks don't always do it, and we can't really make them, but if they don't, you can always just yell at them if you care. Or kick them if it helps. Or ignore them. Or add them to the list^[2]. Whatever floats your boat. Just don't be an arse. -— Lyrithya ༆ 23:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Neutral. I really don't care, but Llwy's definitely overreacting. --TheRealSexyFluttershy (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
So I'm overreacting, and Supergeeky1 and Madclaw, who have been just as vocal and obnoxious about the subject - if not more so, at least in Madclaw's case - aren't? I don't buy that. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:29, 2 Jul 2014
Against. First of all I'm just going to get this out of the way in saying that I myself don't care for poopdick or whatever else is deemed as a "shock image"; the images don't offend me personally but I don't get a kick from seeing them either. Okay now that's out of the way I'm going to explain why I'm voting against. The descriptive terms "normal" and "shock image" are subjective and could cover different things by different people's own logic and beliefs. What one may deem as a "shock image" may be considered "normal" by somebody else and of course that makes enforcing such a rule to be a nightmare. The majority of "shock images" that are posted on IRC are labelled as NSFW anyway so if you click and get grounded by your parents for looking at poopdick then who's fault is that? It's not Uncyclopedia's job to censor (nor is it really the duty of any website on the internet but that's beside the point). If anybody has a personal issue with these images then all I can suggest is either talking it over with the user who posted them or just use the /ignore function if they're really that insufferable, I don't know. Either way I don't think having a strict rule that forbids these types of images would be the right way to go about this. Yeah I know I've mostly repeated what's already been said above but w/e. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 01:06, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

↑ With a few exceptions. Some NSFW things are assumed to go without saying, for instance anything Mr-Ex says or links.
↑ Of Mr-Ex.

Abstain, for I am not on IRC, thus apparently not a member of this community (who the fuck would say such nonsense?). It seems very obvious that a fair compromise would be an unwritten promise that each and every shock image will be clearly preceded by a warning, a big enough warning to grab your attention even if you have poop in your face (you know who you are). That's just courtesy. Aleister 1:50 1-7-14
-- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 01:57, Jul. 2, 2014
IRC is nothing without it.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 15:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Then IRC is nothing. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:02, 2 Jul 2014
Neutral. I don't care for this at all. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 18:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Against. Shock images invigorate the human spirit and are useful in facilitating community discussions (see this forum). --EMC^[TALK]18:50 Jul 3 2014
Useless, late to the party against vote I'm nothing without shock humor. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 03:10, Saturday 05 July 2014 -

This is going nowhere fast

It all seems to boil down to this: a) there is no right answer, and b) Llwy-ar-lawr is easily offended, short-tempered, always wants to have the last word and may or may not have a poor sense of humour.^[1]

There is no denying that posting shock images is a joke. However, I believe it is also clear that they are a different kind of joke from those usually found on Uncyclopedia.^[2]^[3] There are jokes that are intended to make someone else laugh, and there are jokes that are intended to make the joke-teller laugh; shock images are of the latter kind. They are not inherently funny^[4] - what is funny about them is the reaction of the person the joke is directed at. I may be telling you a whole lot of stuff you already know, but the point is that there is disagreement over whether this type of joke is funny, or at least whether it is right or wrong.

Ultimately, there is no reason for anyone to care. How I see it is that if only people never posted shock images, we wouldn't have this trouble. How you^[5] see it is if only Llwy-ar-lawr hadn't made a stink, we wouldn't have this trouble. Both views are correct. It's everyone's fault we're here yelling at each other - everyone's fault because we're all human. Because we're all equally right and wrong, no one will ever be able to convince any of us we're wrong, and we'll just keep holding our opinions with an iron grip until the cows come home.

That said, the reason I kept arguing is that I think many of your points are inadequate and many of my points have been inadequately addressed. For example, the thread with Frosty in which he simply changed the subject rather than properly responding to my statement that he was not around IRC enough to know if his statement that people almost always pointed out their NSFW links was accurate, and the thread with Zombiebaron in which I kept (undeniably, I think) repeating that Geeky intends his links to shock, and Zombiebaron kept repeating that this perception was all in my head. I firmly believe that I am losing this argument because I am not being listened to, and while I really, really hate that, I am afraid I have no choice but to give up.^[6]^[7]

In any case, for now I am happy to leave IRC, and if you like it that's too bad because I'm doing my best to make you feel bad about it.^[8] – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:06, 2 Jul 2014

↑ Before you say 'oh she's just putting herself down again', I believe I am only stating the obvious, at least from your point of view.
↑ I'm not saying Uncyclopedia and IRC should have the same standards; they probably shouldn't.
↑ They're also the kind of joke Spike would object to. I know, I'm Spike blah blah. True story.
↑ Unless there is something very, very wrong with you.
↑ I refer here to my detractors. In spite of Zombiebaron's comment above, my impression is that the 'community' is in fact heavily divided on this issue.
↑ This entire paragraph is an opinion. Form another opinion about it at your own risk.
↑ Reminds me a little of this.
↑ This is supposed to be a joke.

>Everyone's fault because we're all human.

I beg to differ. --TheRealSexyFluttershy (talk) 02:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I can't tell what you're trying to say there.

Also, I regret my failure to phrase this vote as a proposal to force/recommend people to mark NSFW links as such, rather than to prohibit them altogether, because I think the former was what I really meant and it's certainly what I'm more in favour of. Aleister's suggestion is not a compromise, but exactly what I would also like. I believe a true compromise would be to add a warning to MediaWiki:Webchat-header that you are likely to encounter NSFW links on IRC, and per a comment of mine above I believe some kind of compromise may be appropriate. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:43, 2 Jul 2014

I really really hate it when people do this. I was talking to you up the page and then you start a new section about our discussion and other things. Instead of saying "I don't think you're listening to me" you made a public proclamation that I was not listening to you, which is not true. Also, nowhere in our discussion did you mention Geeky. Never once did I say that anything was "all in your head". What I did say is that being offended is a choice that one makes, and it would seem that most of the other people who have commented here share that sentiment. When I click a link and I'm unsure what I'm about to see I hover over the close button, and if I don't want to see it I close it fast. Geeky has been posting all manner of strange images in the channel for well over a year now, and anybody who is around on a regular basis should know what they are getting in to when they click one of his links. If Geeky really intended to shock us he would post some photos of himself fully dressed eating dinner with his loving family. Also, I agree with you compromise: I think there should be something at the top of UN:CHAT that warns people to click links at their own risk. -- The Zombiebaron 03:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
I didn't ignore your arguments. You kept trying to convince me that you have spent more time on IRC than I have. You must understand that I have been around since 2010, you 2013. I spend different hours a day online (whilst this drama was going it was 4am in Sydney and I was asleep) and when I pointed out less chat doesn't equal less IRC experience/ED was irrelevant, you completely went off on a tangent about anarchy and North Korea. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly, llwy after reading the whole forum through I find it kind of funny you're telling Frosty he can't speak of irc because he hasn't used it as much. It's wrong! Llqy you've been on irc, like, what, a year? Then there's the people who've been almost a decade in... you see when you told Frosty that it doesn't matter if he was on irc before you or not, well it really does matter. IRC hasn't probably changed a shit, at least during the almost 3 years I've spend there already it hasn't. The only thing that changed was when you came in and started complaining about shock porn, something that had existed on IRC looooong before you arrived, and started this forum. Well, as you see, almost nobody is taking your side and nothing is going to really change, but nice try anyway. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 05:51, 2 July, 2014 (UTC)
I don't know why I'm editing this forum. I hate editing these forums. I forgot we even had forums until a minute ago. Anyway, I just want to explain one thing a little bit to see if this helps. Something Frosty said earlier about laughing at ourselves is important here. When you mention that the intent of the shock images is to shock and give the person linking them a laugh, well, that is ordinarily true on the internet. But in the case of IRC, where we're all friends chumming around and joking around about how pathetic we all are (and we are, oh god, we are), it's a form of shared humor between us. It's in many cases the art of trying to find the most subtle and misleading way to sneak an image in that the person will click on unknowingly. It's less about the image than it is about that deception. It's a back and forth game people play to see if they can fake each other out, and much how you might laugh and say "haha wow I suck" if you lose a game of Mario Kart against your friends, or smile widely at the reception of information that you assembled the juicer the wrong way and got orange pulp all over you and your friends, the big entertainment here (a lot of the time, at any rate) is being able to acknowledge having been defeated in this game, and the reassuring feeling of being able to take stock of ourselves and realize that we are not perfect, we can be offended, and we can be fooled. This is the reason that good friends prank each other. It's a different scenario than just trying to nail some random kid in class with a spitball, it's a shared laugh at our own humanity that we can intimately enjoy with people who we've come to know well enough that we're comfortable talking about poopdicks with them. Poopdick is love. Poopdick is life. (At least one person is going to wonder what the fuck I just said and call me a faggot, you just wait and see) -RA HB 12:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
What? Faggot? You? You mean, like this? [[1]] Snarglefoop (talk) 13:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Well, that is a photograph of me, so yes, almost exactly like that. -RA HB 13:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
If anyone reads all of what you said - which btw makes a good deal of sense - they won't have the slightest doubt what you mean. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:50, 2 Jul 2014

Apparently I have not explained myself well enough, because there still seems to be a disconnect going on. I think at this point I may as well post the log of the entire discussion that led to this forum and it can speak for itself. (There's also a chunk of text at the bottom, so if you'd like to skip to that just scroll down.) The reason I decided to leave IRC was not entirely because of a single shock image, as I implied earlier; it was because of... well, you'll see.

 [04:55:37 PM] <SG1|Hereish> So imagine my confusion everytime I stumbled upon something like: MFW I woke up this morning and thought it was monday and then realized it was actually still sunday http://imgur.com/ZuH04kD.gif
 [04:56:02 PM] <Matthlock> Fuck off with the poop dick.
 [04:56:10 PM] <SG1|Hereish> MOTHERFUCKER WHAT
 [04:56:11 PM] <CatTheColourful> ahahahahahahaha
 [04:57:10 PM] <Matthlock> SG1|Hereish: DO I LOOK LIKE A BITCH
 [04:57:30 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I know! We need a vote. yes, yet another vote.
 [04:57:31 PM] <SG1|Hereish> You don't want me to answer that question.
 [04:57:38 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Per llwy-ar-lawr.
 [04:57:42 PM] <CatTheColourful> XD
 [04:57:58 PM] <Matthlock> SG1|Hereish: Go ahead, hit me with your best shot, motherfucker.
 [04:58:09 PM] <SG1|Hereish> http://strawpoll.me/2027939
 [04:58:25 PM] <CatTheColourful> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 [04:58:31 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> No, geeky, a vote on whether to allow you to post the poop image.
 [04:58:46 PM] <SG1|Hereish> FREE POOPDICK
 [04:58:53 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Poopdick 2012
 [04:59:00 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Speaking of nothing in particular, I hope you don't mind that the tab on special pages now says 'Special page'.
 [04:59:11 PM] <Matthlock> It's all right.
 [04:59:23 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> SG1|Hereish/Geeky: Btw, seeing as Darthipedia is a Star Wars wiki, would you be interested in an affiliation with a movies wiki that me and my best friend Teleram founded?: http://movies.shoutwiki.com
 [04:59:26 PM] Quit Mike3620 has left this server (Quit: Colloquy for iPhone - http://colloquy.mobi).
 [04:59:53 PM] <Matthlock> Derpy-MUFFINS: I would be interested.
 [05:00:19 PM] <SG1|Hereish> I think it would depend on how active the site ends up being. IIRC, Darthipedia usually limits our friendship to wikis who are routinely active.
 [05:00:23 PM] <CatTheColourful> Derpy-MUFFINS: lol it's a bit more than just a star wars-wiki
 [05:00:56 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> well yeah
 [05:01:09 PM] <SG1|Hereish> But having said that, we typically only befriend either Star Wars projects or other humor wikis.
 [05:02:06 PM] <SG1|Hereish> "The Master of Disguise is a 2002 "comedy" film starring Dana Carvey and Jennifer Esospito."
 [05:02:11 PM] <SG1|Hereish> I love how you used comedy in quotes.
 [05:03:41 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> lel
 [05:03:59 PM] <Matthlock> Well it's true. It's a fauxmedy.
 [05:05:00 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> turtle
 [05:05:08 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> turtle turtle turtle
 [05:05:10 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> tuuuuuurtle
 [05:08:06 PM] <Matthlock> #turtles
 [05:08:33 PM] <Matthlock> ##turtles
 [05:08:47 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> Am I not /turtley/ enough for The Turtle Club?
 [05:08:59 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Matthlock: Vote here http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Vote:_shock_images_on_IRC
 [05:11:02 PM] <Matthlock> Wait so when I vote for it's against shock images?
 [05:11:35 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> if you don't like how I set it up, feel free to change it
 [05:12:11 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I just think that someone proposing something should try to phrase it so they're voting for what they're proposing, if possible, so it's less confusing or whatever
 [05:14:19 PM] <sleeptyper> meh, le'web and le'irc should stay separated
 [05:14:36 PM] <SG1|Hereish> "reasonably intelligent"
 [05:14:37 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> we can't hold a vote here though... it would be impractical
 [05:14:44 PM] <sleeptyper> atleast for what comes to "instant content"
 [05:14:56 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Goddammit, Matthlock. You removed my vote.
 [05:15:09 PM] <SG1|Hereish> And Snarglefoop's.
 [05:15:10 PM] <Matthlock> Boo you whore.
 [05:15:30 PM] <CatTheColourful> ...wtf
 [05:15:30 PM] <sleeptyper> if it's a shock/porn/MLP/whatever, tag le'pic NSDW
 [05:15:38 PM] <sleeptyper> NSFW*
 [05:15:44 PM] <CatTheColourful> Matthlock: idk if you're supposed to do so, really
 [05:15:56 PM] <Matthlock> Fuck damn it.
 [05:16:09 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> sleeptyper: that's what the rule said. you may vote for it if you like
 [05:16:10 PM] <CatTheColourful> honestly
 [05:16:22 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I fixed matthlock's presumably accidental removal of comments
 [05:16:42 PM] <CatTheColourful> justice has won again
 [05:16:48 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Snarglefoop voted twice.
 [05:16:56 PM] <sleeptyper> llwy-ar-lawr: my point is that irc rules should be formed and ruled in irc, web rules in web
 [05:17:05 PM] <madclaway> who is snaglefoop?
 [05:17:10 PM] <madclaway> is he even in IRC?
 [05:17:11 PM] <SG1|Hereish> llwy's dad.
 [05:17:11 PM] <ChanSeba> ella
 [05:17:52 PM] <madclaway> the funny thing is that even if you do get a rule against shock images there is no way to enforce it effectively
 [05:18:11 PM] <sleeptyper> for example, banning someone here for saying "poop" in web is overexaggerated
 [05:18:16 PM] <madclaway> if I can't post shock images in the channel I'll just simply have to PM them 
 [05:18:21 PM] <madclaway> 8)
 [05:18:24 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Especially considering ops in this channel post poopdick far more often than I do.
 [05:18:27 PM] <Matthlock> Snarglefoop is Llwy's father? Like father, like son.
 [05:18:39 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> well he's easy to canvass
 [05:18:47 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Like father, like slightly androgynous daughter.
 [05:18:47 PM] <Matthlock> I mean, like father, like daughter.
 [05:19:02 PM] <Matthlock> SG1|Hereish: Yeah, that's better.
 [05:19:02 PM] <madclaway> like spoon and teaspoon
 [05:19:18 PM] <Matthlock> Like wooden spoon and teaspoon. Remember, they're Welsh.
 [05:19:30 PM] <sleeptyper> what happens in irc, stays in irc (except chirpyy quotes ;)
 [05:20:07 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> madclaway: I can whack people with various sized sticks if necessary
 [05:20:09 PM] <CatTheColourful> oh shit forgot he's llwy's dad lol
 [05:20:10 PM] <Matthlock> Sorry for dicking out but she told me to do it. Plus poop dick is nasty shit.
 [05:20:23 PM] <madclaway> llwy-ar-lawr: I know and thats why I love you
 [05:20:33 PM] <madclaway> I want you to bang me with a stick for ever and ever
 [05:20:33 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Hypothetically llwy's dad.
 [05:20:34 PM] <sleeptyper> aw
 [05:20:49 PM] <SG1|Hereish> CatTheColourful: Go vote in that thread.
 [05:20:53 PM] <SG1|Hereish> #saveourpoopdick
 [05:20:55 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> Llwy's dad is a fork, and her mother's a measuring cup.
 [05:20:56 PM] <sleeptyper> llwy-ar-lawr: no lube for madclaway ;)
 [05:21:30 PM] <sleeptyper> no lubmil either
 [05:21:48 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> Is lubmil a bot?
 [05:21:55 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> no he's just polish
 [05:21:57 PM] <sleeptyper> meh, polish
 [05:22:02 PM] <Matthlock> I could talk to Zombie about this issue but I know he's a man of few words and he probably won't reply.
 [05:22:14 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> Zombiebaron ping
 [05:22:17 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I'd like to drag No_one_at_all in
 [05:22:18 PM] <sleeptyper> almost like a bot, but with subtle differences
 [05:22:23 PM] <lubmil> #8,3co?
 [05:22:28 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Zombiebaron is totally gonna vote in favor of poopdicks.
 [05:22:33 PM] <SG1|Hereish> I place my trust in him.
 [05:22:37 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> No_one_at_all would vote against
 [05:22:44 PM] <Matthlock> Do you worship Zombie?
 [05:23:06 PM] <Matthlock> Is Zombie your GZ?
 [05:23:37 PM] <madclaway> [23:22] Matthlock I could talk to Zombie about this issue but I know he's a man of few words and he probably won't reply. <--- I know Zombie to be quite talkative, so maybe his lack of words towards you is just you
 [05:23:56 PM] <madclaway> [23:22] Matthlock I could talk to Zombie about this issue but I know he's a man of few words and he probably won't reply.
 [05:24:00 PM] <madclaway> http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User_talk:Snarglefoop#Hi_uhm.....Dad
 [05:24:02 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> he's a man of varying numbers of words
 [05:24:06 PM] <Matthlock> Fuck I already said that.
 [05:24:09 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> meh, he talks to me sometimes
 [05:24:25 PM] Quit CatTheColourful has left this server (Ping timeout: 246 seconds).
 [05:24:31 PM] <SG1|Hereish> That pussy.
 [05:24:40 PM] <Matthlock> +Zombiebaron What's your opinion on this matter?
 [05:24:41 PM] * SG1|Hereish shakes his fist at CatTheColourful
 [05:25:02 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Zombiebaron: #saveourpoopdick
 [05:25:39 PM] <Matthlock> I honestly don't give much of a fuck, I honestly think freewill is good, but the poop dick is disgusting.
 [05:26:23 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> One point people seem to miss.
 [05:26:31 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Is this not against Uncyclopedia's archive policy? http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Snarglefoop&curid=711679&diff=5769946&oldid=5769944'
 [05:26:48 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> It may be fun to post shock images, but do you ever consider that you're infringing on others' fun by doing so?
 [05:26:58 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> SG1|Hereish: NO. There is no such policy.
 [05:27:03 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> >inb4 Madclaw socks to rig the vote.
 [05:27:23 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> And if you act as if there is one, I *will* block you.
 [05:27:29 PM] <madclaway> I have no socks
 [05:27:38 PM] <madclaway> and then another admin will unblock us
 [05:27:43 PM] <Matthlock> You'll block me, Llwy?
 [05:27:52 PM] <madclaway> and you'll have lost a friend
 [05:27:55 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> http://darthipedia.com/wiki/User:Manticore *cough, cough*
 [05:28:04 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Please do block me, because I've seen multiple administrators revert users for removing talk page messages without archiving them.
 [05:28:14 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> that was on wikia wasn't it?
 [05:28:20 PM] <SG1|Hereish> And the fork.
 [05:28:24 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> ^ @Geeky
 [05:28:42 PM] <madclaway> why does everyone assume that Manticore and I are the same person?
 [05:28:45 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Stop telling me administrators are doing this and that without showing me links because it's getting annoying
 [05:28:52 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> siiiiigh
 [05:28:54 PM] <madclaway> you have to be a real retarded aspie to believe such a thing
 [05:29:06 PM] <madclaway> wow llwy-ar-lawr 
 [05:29:14 PM] <madclaway> did you just get your 1st period?
 [05:29:22 PM] <madclaway> :D YOU'RE A WOMAN NOW
 [05:29:25 PM] <madclaway> YOU HAVE FLOWERED
 [05:29:28 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> that was years ago
 [05:29:41 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> actually never mind that
 [05:29:42 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Because I'm to be expected to sort through thousands of lines of logs in search of a few revert instances?
 [05:29:43 PM] <ChanSeba> im never going to watch it
 [05:30:11 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> other people do it
 [05:30:14 PM] <madclaway> I'm beginning to think this admin thing is a little high reached for you
 [05:30:18 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Other people being you.
 [05:30:21 PM] <madclaway> I had such high hopes for you
 [05:30:29 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> people seem to forget that it's before your period that you're all mad
 [05:30:46 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I'm not telling you anything I wouldn't have told you any other time
 [05:31:05 PM] <Matthlock> Fuck it. I don't give a fuck. I don't give a fucking fuck. I don't give a fuck about this. I don't give a fuck about what wins. I don't give a fuck about what loses. I don't give a fuck of most of this bullshit. Fuck all. Fuck all of this. Fuck it. Just fuck it all damn, fuck. I'm gone. Fuck, I'm gone. Fucking bye.
 [05:31:09 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Either way, I don't particularly care whether the rule exists or not. I just thought it was ridiculous that I was being threatened with a ban over something as trivial as that.
 [05:31:10 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I decided long ago that I would block anyone who reverted removal of comments from someone's own talk page
 [05:31:26 PM] Quit Matthlock has left this server (Quit: Page closed).
 [05:31:57 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> though if my clearer mind prevailed, I would most likely force myself to warn them first
 [05:32:00 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> an 11-year-old boy on my wiki thought that period meant like school period or something
 [05:32:10 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> ignorance is bliss
 [05:32:31 PM] <madclaway> I do think it's hilarious you whine about shock images in IRC, not even having the balls ( no pun intended ) to vote on the subject under your own username but rather use a sockpuppet account, and then even be bleek enough to post links to the shock images in question on that forum for the whole world to see
 [05:32:51 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I don't know what you're talking about with sockpuppets.
 [05:33:04 PM] <madclaway> of course you don't ;)
 [05:33:09 PM] <madclaway> always deny everything
 [05:33:25 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Though it shouldn't surprise you that I act as if I don't have balls.
 [05:33:46 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> wait, what's No one at all's Uncyc username?
 [05:33:51 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> bizzeebeever
 [05:33:59 PM] <madclaway> [23:26] llwy-ar-lawr SG1|Hereish: NO. There is no such policy.
 [05:34:00 PM] <madclaway> [23:27] llwy-ar-lawr And if you act as if there is one, I *will* block you.
 [05:34:03 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> ah ok
 [05:34:44 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> you're quoting this all of a sudden why?
 [05:34:49 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I'm lost
 [05:35:02 PM] <madclaway> http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Snarglefoop
 [05:35:08 PM] <madclaway> how is this not your sockpuppet?
 [05:35:19 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> oh knock it off
 [05:35:26 PM] <madclaway> no seriously
 [05:35:39 PM] <madclaway> why is this such a sensitive subject to you
 [05:35:54 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> why is any false accusation a sensitive subject to anyone?
 [05:35:58 PM] <Derpy-MUFFINS> [15:18] <SG1|Hereish> llwy's dad.
 [05:36:04 PM] <madclaway> supposedly
 [05:36:13 PM] <madclaway> Quinlanfan's mother
 [05:36:21 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> in case you haven't noticed, we use different kinds of English
 [05:36:31 PM] <madclaway> I mean I could create a forum about this
 [05:36:37 PM] <madclaway> sockpuppets are bad m'kay
 [05:36:42 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> and I could delete it
 [05:36:56 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> admit it, you have a COI
 [05:36:58 PM] <madclaway> which would be a misuse of your administrator tools
 [05:37:12 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I'm very, very tired of this.
 [05:37:18 PM] <madclaway> I'm not
 [05:37:19 PM] Nick Derpy-MUFFINS is now known as Flutterpanties.
 [05:37:21 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I can tell
 [05:37:34 PM] <madclaway> I'm gonna fillibust the shit out of this
 [05:37:35 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> you just love slinging mud at me and watching me squirm
 [05:37:47 PM] <madclaway> you make it sound so sexy
 [05:37:57 PM] Nick madclaway is now known as Mudclaw.
 [05:37:59 PM] <Flutterpanties> tbh, ^
 [05:38:00 PM] <Mudclaw> oops
 [05:38:01 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> and then you try to turn everything into sex
 [05:38:05 PM] <Mudclaw> freudian slip up
 [05:38:09 PM] Nick Mudclaw is now known as Madclaw.
 [05:38:16 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> and I can't help laughing at your jokes
 [05:38:20 PM] <SG1|Hereish> brb church
 [05:38:25 PM] <Madclaw> noone can
 [05:38:29 PM] <Madclaw> I'm funny as hell
 [05:38:50 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> why do people say hell is all these things when it actually isn't most of them?
 [05:39:06 PM] <sleeptyper> spoonie, yer sexy when you squirm
 [05:39:15 PM] <Madclaw> oh llwy-ar-lawr FYI when SG1|Hereish says brb church it means he's masturbating
 [05:39:21 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I see
 [05:39:23 PM] <sleeptyper> ^
 [05:39:38 PM] <SG1|Hereish> http://static1.gamespot.com/uploads/original/1535/15358569/2541088-lolchurch.jpg
 [05:39:47 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Madclaw: wait, are you doing all this because I'm sexy when I squirm?
 [05:39:50 PM] <Madclaw> in all seriousness an admin utilizing a sockpuppet is very very bad form
 [05:40:03 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Quit preaching to the choir.
 [05:40:10 PM] <Madclaw> no I do it regardless, the sexy squirming is just the cherry on top
 [05:40:18 PM] <Flutterpanties> tell that to my community, claw
 [05:40:34 PM] <Madclaw> I would Flutterpanties but it looks like they all killed themelves
 [05:40:46 PM] Join Mike3620 has joined this channel (~Mike3620@unaffiliated/mike3620).
 [05:41:00 PM] <sleeptyper> Flutterpanties, cameltoes are a valuable
 [05:41:04 PM] Nick Madclaw is now known as Snarglefoop.
 [05:41:33 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I don't think you know if I'm sexy. I'll bet you a dime a dozen I'm not, and that I'm actually just a smelly sweaty admin stereotype.
 [05:41:44 PM] <Snarglefoop> oooooh sweat
 [05:41:48 PM] Nick Flutterpanties is now known as IFYLOFD.
 [05:41:52 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Probably, but as you said, ignorance is bliss.
 [05:41:59 PM] <Snarglefoop> administrator type= librarian fantasie
 [05:42:30 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Hey wait a minute. Are you sure /you/ aren't Snarglefoop's sockpuppet?
 [05:42:37 PM] <Snarglefoop> who knows
 [05:42:51 PM] <Snarglefoop> we'll have to ask someone for a checkuser
 [05:43:01 PM] <Snarglefoop> but I supposedly already am Manticore
 [05:43:01 PM] <IFYLOFD> he probably is
 [05:43:11 PM] <Snarglefoop> could I be so bold as to have 2 sockpuppets?
 [05:43:17 PM] <Snarglefoop> am I that devious?
 [05:43:19 PM] <sleeptyper> llwy-ar-lawr: if your width-to-height- ratio is more than 1 , you're übersexy (in USA)
 [05:43:23 PM] <IFYLOFD> >2
 [05:43:24 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> You could, but if you abused them you get blocked.
 [05:43:27 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Plot twist: He really is Snarglefoop's sockpuppet, and therefor llwy's dad all along.
 [05:43:44 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> So then trying to do sexy things with me would be incest.
 [05:43:46 PM] <SG1|Hereish> A lesson in family affection.
 [05:44:00 PM] <IFYLOFD> HEY KIDS
 [05:44:00 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Though I'm not sure what one is supposed to learn from it.
 [05:44:07 PM] <IFYLOFD> CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION
 [05:44:12 PM] <Snarglefoop> I'm from Darthipedia remember, Star Wars, it's not Star Wars without incest
 [05:44:14 PM] <IFYLOFD> WELCOME TO THE FAMILY
 [05:44:24 PM] <SG1|Hereish> The lesson is that family affection is a beautiful thing.
 [05:44:38 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> This channel is boring and annoying
 [05:44:42 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Just ask Serge Gainsbourg.

 [06:41:17 PM] Join You have joined the channel #uncyclopedia (~foop@wikipedia/Cathfolant).
 [06:41:17 PM] Topic The channel topic is "SERVER UPGRADE OVER | Enjoy your MediaWiki 1.23, plebes.".
 [06:41:17 PM] Topic The topic was set by No_one_at_all on 29/06/14 12:47 AM.
 [06:41:17 PM] Mode Channel modes: C, L, P, no messages from outside, topic protection, f
 [06:41:17 PM] Created This channel was created on 10/01/07 04:16 PM.
 [06:41:17 PM] URL Channel URL: http://en.uncyclopedia.co
 [06:41:54 PM] Whois SexyFluttershy is ~IceChat77@67-2-154-47.slkc.qwest.net (Rarityfan)
 [06:41:54 PM] Whois SexyFluttershy is a user on channels: #uncyclopedia
 [06:41:54 PM] Whois SexyFluttershy is online via kornbluth.freenode.net (Frankfurt, Germany).
 [06:41:54 PM] Whois SexyFluttershy is logged in as Fluttersocks.
 [06:41:54 PM] Whois End of WHOIS list.
 [06:44:25 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> silence is golden
 [06:45:25 PM] <Zombiebaron> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qKy9iK_jDc
 [06:45:26 PM] <snerk> Simon & Garfunkel - Sounds Of Silence (Lyrics)
 [06:45:27 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Duct tape is silver.
 [06:45:47 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> duct tape is also good for making people shut up
 [06:46:15 PM] <Zombiebaron> I made a chair out of duct tape and pizza boxes for a science project in grade 6
 [06:46:33 PM] <Zombiebaron> I watched a lot of Red Green
 [06:47:01 PM] <SexyFluttershy> Zombiebaron: Could you change my Uncyclopedia name to SexyFluttershy pl0x?: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Hatsune_Miku
 [06:47:16 PM] <Zombiebaron> ok
 [06:47:22 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> You change your name a lot.
 [06:47:40 PM] <SexyFluttershy> I'm indecisive.
 [06:47:49 PM] <Zombiebaron> done
 [06:47:58 PM] <SexyFluttershy> grazzi
 [06:48:00 PM] <SG1|Hereish> http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Place_of_work_Violence_How_To_Prevent_Workplace_Altercations
 [06:48:06 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Aren't you also the owner of the Rarityfan account?
 [06:48:08 PM] <SG1|Hereish> ^ Front page-worthy content, right there.
 [06:48:35 PM] <SexyFluttershy> llwy: yeah but i forgot the password lo
 [06:48:40 PM] <SexyFluttershy> lol
 [06:48:44 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> ah
 [06:49:13 PM] <chanserv> op #uncyclopedia llwy-ar-lawr
 [06:49:13 PM] Mode ChanServ gives channel operator privileges to you.
 [06:49:49 PM] Topic You set the channel topic to "SERVER UPGRADE OVER | Enjoy your MediaWiki 1.23, plebes. | Do you enjoy gross pictures of poop? Vote here: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Vote:_shock_images_in_IRC".
 [06:49:52 PM] <Zombiebaron> llwy-ar-lawr: lol you linked a shock image on the wiki
 [06:49:55 PM] <Zombiebaron> that's bannable
 [06:50:01 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> feel free to delink it if you like.
 [06:50:06 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I don't mind
 [06:50:09 PM] <Zombiebaron> well you do say "this one"
 [06:50:12 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I'm not sure why I made a point of linking it
 [06:50:16 PM] <Zombiebaron> but, like, why
 [06:50:19 PM] <Zombiebaron> ya
 [06:50:27 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I don't know, I'm a bit strange sometimes
 [06:50:34 PM] <Zombiebaron> haha
 [06:50:41 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> you can block me too if you want
 [06:51:08 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> also, you may be interested in checkusering me and snarglefoop in case Madclaw starts lecturing me on sockpuppets again
 [06:51:11 PM] <SexyFluttershy> lol why hasn't Isarra been desysoped yet
 [06:51:12 PM] <SG1|Hereish> I'm still not quite sure why you expect that policy to ever be regulated in this channel.
 [06:51:32 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> maybe I'd regulate it if it were a policy
 [06:51:32 PM] <ChanSeba> BILL!
 [06:51:40 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I'm not sure why you didn't hear me the first time
 [06:51:54 PM] <SG1|Hereish> And you'd end up banning the majority of the ops.
 [06:52:25 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> can you name one?
 [06:52:29 PM] <SG1|Hereish> RAHB
 [06:52:32 PM] <SG1|Hereish> No_one_at_all.
 [06:52:36 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Hotadmin.
 [06:52:50 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Hell, Zombiebaron I believe.
 [06:53:04 PM] <SexyFluttershy> Zombie is a voice
 [06:53:12 PM] <SexyFluttershy> i think
 [06:53:26 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Voice of reason.
 [06:53:27 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> if it were a rule they might follow it more
 [06:53:40 PM] <SexyFluttershy> Geeky: xD
 [06:53:49 PM] <Zombiebaron> I'm righting my opinion on this matter in the forum
 [06:53:51 PM] <Zombiebaron> writing
 [06:54:07 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> writing should begin with an r though because the Three R's
 [06:54:10 PM] <SG1|Hereish> #saveourpoopdick
 [06:54:21 PM] <SG1|Hereish> 2012
 [06:54:26 PM] <SexyFluttershy> Reading, wRiting, and aRithmatic
 [06:54:29 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I still don't understand why you're so excited about this
 [06:54:32 PM] <SexyFluttershy> dafuq
 [06:54:55 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> we will probably never see eye to eye
 [06:54:57 PM] <SexyFluttershy> llwy: The poopdick gave him a boner, maybe?
 [06:55:03 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Well duh. I'm 6'5.
 [06:55:04 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> victory will go to the one who yells the loudest
 [06:55:18 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> so let's all of us yell real loud
 [06:55:28 PM] <SG1|Hereish> And if yelling poopdick the loudest guarantees me victory, I'll go out into the streets right now.
 [06:55:32 PM] <SexyFluttershy> YOU MEAN LIKE THIS?
 [06:55:36 PM] <SexyFluttershy> @LLWY
 [06:55:44 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> yeah
 [06:55:52 PM] <SexyFluttershy> OKAY
 [06:56:13 PM] <SG1|Hereish> llwy-ar-lawr is already losing this one.
 [06:56:21 PM] <SG1|Hereish> You're supposed to type in all caps.
 [06:56:26 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> ALL CAPS
 [06:56:30 PM] <SexyFluttershy> HEY KIDS
 [06:56:33 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> HI
 [06:56:33 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Exactly.
 [06:56:39 PM] <SexyFluttershy> CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION
 [06:56:46 PM] <SexyFluttershy> WELCOME TO THE FAMILY
 [06:56:50 PM] <SG1|Hereish> http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/When_Should_You_Paint_Your_Home
 [06:57:00 PM] * llwy-ar-lawr pokes No_one_at_all with Isarra 's furry sheep in the hopes that one of them will vote
 [06:57:14 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> thanks for reporting spam
 [06:57:30 PM] <SG1|Hereish> I wasn't reporting spam. I was posting my new favorite article.
 [06:57:34 PM] <SexyFluttershy> >furry
 [06:57:43 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> if you want it in your userspace, just say so
 [06:58:03 PM] <SexyFluttershy> Does sactage even have an Uncyclopedia account?
 [06:58:10 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Userspace? When it's easily mainspace-worthy?
 [06:58:11 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> he's called furry
 [06:58:11 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Pfft.
 [06:58:32 PM] <SexyFluttershy> on the wiki?
 [06:58:34 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> yes
 [06:59:14 PM] <SexyFluttershy> That's shocking.
 [06:59:24 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> http://test.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Main_Page
 [06:59:38 PM] <Zombiebaron> http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Forum%3AVote%3A_shock_images_on_IRC&diff=5769972&oldid=5769945
 [06:59:40 PM] <Zombiebaron> You're welcome
 [06:59:59 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Poopdick is victorious on all fronts. \m/
 [07:00:53 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Hello? Shock image isn't that hard to define.
 [07:01:21 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> It's anything that's pornographic or scatological.
 [07:01:23 PM] <SexyFluttershy> [link blocked by spam filter]
 [07:01:38 PM] <Zombiebaron> So all porn is shocking?
 [07:01:43 PM] <SG1|Hereish> So the same sort of images Uncyclopedia placed on its own main page last year?
 [07:01:44 PM] <Zombiebaron> I disagree
 [07:01:45 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> It's NSFW.
 [07:01:53 PM] <Zombiebaron> Uncyclopedia is NSFW
 [07:02:02 PM] <Zombiebaron> IRC is NSFW
 [07:02:06 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Uncyclopedia is not pointlessly NSFW, though.
 [07:02:19 PM] <Zombiebaron> Well there is a point
 [07:02:23 PM] <Zombiebaron> I assume
 [07:02:27 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> i.e. to be funny
 [07:02:47 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> images of people doing highly unsanitary and abnormal stuff are not funny by themselves, therefore they should not be allowed
 [07:02:51 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> innit?
 [07:02:55 PM] <Zombiebaron> I think the sort of people that post poopdick would also find it funny that you're spending this much time thinking about it
 [07:03:04 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> they can speak for themselves
 [07:03:09 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> they started this whole mess
 [07:03:16 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> 'they' i.e. SG1|Hereish
 [07:03:26 PM] <SG1|Hereish> i.e. Kippy
 [07:03:26 PM] <ChanSeba> haha
 [07:03:27 PM] <SG1|Hereish> i.e. RAHB
 [07:03:33 PM] <Zombiebaron> Ya
 [07:03:45 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> No, the one who started today's mess was you. Stop trying to wiggle out of it.
 [07:03:47 PM] <Zombiebaron> Pretty much the whole channel trolls each other constantly
 [07:03:49 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Also implying that I personally posted that image because I found it funny.
 [07:03:52 PM] <SexyFluttershy> i.e. Geeky's right-hand man Madclaw
 [07:03:57 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Didn't you?
 [07:04:02 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> If not, why did you post it?
 [07:04:06 PM] <SG1|Hereish> Of course not. The image is disgusting.
 [07:04:13 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> Why?
 [07:04:13 PM] <SG1|Hereish> The reactions to it is what's funny.
 [07:04:18 PM] <Zombiebaron> ^^^
 [07:04:22 PM] <Zombiebaron> There you go
 [07:04:33 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> I've had more than enough of both of you.
 [07:04:39 PM] <Zombiebaron> ok bye
 [07:04:42 PM] <Zombiebaron> !kick llwy-ar-lawr
 [07:04:42 PM] Kick You have been kicked from channel #uncyclopedia by UncycBot (GTFO).
 [07:04:57 PM] Join You have joined the channel #uncyclopedia (~foop@wikipedia/Cathfolant).
 [07:04:57 PM] Topic The channel topic is "SERVER UPGRADE OVER | Enjoy your MediaWiki 1.23, plebes. | Do you enjoy gross pictures of poop? Vote here: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Vote:_shock_images_in_IRC".
 [07:04:57 PM] Topic The topic was set by llwy-ar-lawr!~foop@wikipedia/Cathfolant on 01/07/14 06:49 PM.
 [07:04:57 PM] Mode Channel modes: C, L, P, no messages from outside, topic protection, f
 [07:04:57 PM] Created This channel was created on 10/01/07 04:16 PM.
 [07:04:58 PM] URL Channel URL: http://en.uncyclopedia.co
 [07:04:58 PM] <SexyFluttershy> Llwy, you should know very well by now that Geeky is a troll. :P
 [07:05:06 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> !kick Zombiebaron
 [07:05:07 PM] <SG1|Hereish> [19:04:43] <SG1|Hereish> I've posted it for the same reasons No_one_at_all is always posting Craigslist ads for free pianos: it gets a rise out of someone.
 [07:05:11 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> hey.
 [07:05:18 PM] <Zombiebaron> :D
 [07:05:18 PM] <chanserv> op #uncyclopedia llwy-ar-lawr
 [07:05:19 PM] Mode ChanServ gives channel operator privileges to you.
 [07:05:23 PM] <Zombiebaron> !kick llwy-ar-lawr 
 [07:05:24 PM] Kick You have been kicked from channel #uncyclopedia by UncycBot (GTFO).
 [07:05:28 PM] Join You have joined the channel #uncyclopedia (~foop@wikipedia/Cathfolant).
 [07:05:28 PM] Topic The channel topic is "SERVER UPGRADE OVER | Enjoy your MediaWiki 1.23, plebes. | Do you enjoy gross pictures of poop? Vote here: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Vote:_shock_images_in_IRC".
 [07:05:28 PM] Topic The topic was set by llwy-ar-lawr!~foop@wikipedia/Cathfolant on 01/07/14 06:49 PM.
 [07:05:28 PM] URL Channel URL: http://en.uncyclopedia.co
 [07:05:30 PM] Mode Channel modes: C, L, P, no messages from outside, topic protection, f
 [07:05:30 PM] Created This channel was created on 10/01/07 04:16 PM.
 [07:05:30 PM] <Zombiebaron> :D
 [07:05:34 PM] <chanserv> op #uncyclopedia llwy-ar-lawr
 [07:05:34 PM] Mode ChanServ gives channel operator privileges to you.
 [07:05:35 PM] <Zombiebaron> !kick llwy-ar-lawr 
 [07:05:36 PM] Kick You have been kicked from channel #uncyclopedia by UncycBot (GTFO).
 [07:05:42 PM] Join You have joined the channel #uncyclopedia (~foop@wikipedia/Cathfolant).
 [07:05:42 PM] Topic The channel topic is "SERVER UPGRADE OVER | Enjoy your MediaWiki 1.23, plebes. | Do you enjoy gross pictures of poop? Vote here: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Forum:Vote:_shock_images_in_IRC".
 [07:05:42 PM] Topic The topic was set by llwy-ar-lawr!~foop@wikipedia/Cathfolant on 01/07/14 06:49 PM.
 [07:05:42 PM] Mode Channel modes: C, L, P, no messages from outside, topic protection, f
 [07:05:42 PM] Created This channel was created on 10/01/07 04:16 PM.
 [07:05:42 PM] URL Channel URL: http://en.uncyclopedia.co
 [07:05:44 PM] <SG1|Hereish> [19:03:46] <@llwy-ar-lawr> No, the one who started today's mess was you. Stop trying to wiggle out of it.
 [07:05:52 PM] <Zombiebaron> ok you can have a freebie
 [07:05:54 PM] <llwy-ar-lawr> You're all annoying.

I've bolded two parts that I find to be most informative. The first bolded exchange is the one with Madclaw that initially prompted me to take a hike, in which he went on at length about a lot of stuff that I consider to be inappropriate and uncalled for. The second is Geeky's explanation of why he posts the poop image, which I cited in my argument with Zombiebaron.

Anyway, just for the sake of whatever I'll try to respond to Zombiebaron, Frosty and Cat. (Everything RAHB said seems reasonably correct and not worthy of argument.)

Instead of saying "I don't think you're listening to me" you made a public proclamation that I was not listening to you, which is not true. I am sorry for upsetting you, but I was giving up - making a statement that what I was doing was pointless. I didn't see any way to continue my discussion with you that would result in anything worthwhile.
Also, nowhere in our discussion did you mention Geeky. I thought I implied what he did well enough that I didn't have to explicitly mention him by name, I guess? Anyway, now I have mentioned him, so... sorry for the confusion I guess?
Never once did I say that anything was "all in your head". What I did say is that being offended is a choice that one makes The phrasing I used was not identical to yours, but I know what you said and I thought I had phrased it in a way that was equivalent. Evidently I did not.
and it would seem that most of the other people who have commented here share that sentiment. I do not see a majority. I see a some people who share your sentiment, some people who don't care, and some people who share my sentiment.
Geeky has been posting all manner of strange images in the channel for well over a year now, and anybody who is around on a regular basis should know what they are getting in to when they click one of his links. If Geeky really intended to shock us he would post some photos of himself fully dressed eating dinner with his loving family. Sound logic, but you are disregarding all the newcomers to IRC, such as Matthlock and any possible new user who might wander in there looking for help. Should we ignore the fact that some people are not used to Geeky? Should he only 'do his thing' around people who we expect to know better than to be shocked? Should we expect everyone to know better? I don't actually know.
Also, I agree with you compromise: I think there should be something at the top of UN:CHAT that warns people to click links at their own risk. Cool.
You kept trying to convince me that you have spent more time on IRC than I have. No. I was trying to convince you that I currently spend more time on IRC in 2013/14 than you, and that it is people's behaviour in 2014, not in earlier years, that is currently relevant. I know I have spent less time on IRC than you in total and I have admitted that the behaviour you have witnessed may be different from what I have seen.
From what I see, NSFW images come with a warning maybe... 50% of the time. (Very rough estimate.) This is current. In your experience in this year, would you disagree with that estimate? Or do you, in fact, believe that your experience on IRC in earlier years is an accurate statement about what happens now?
and when I pointed out less chat doesn't equal less IRC experience/ED was irrelevant, you completely went off on a tangent about anarchy and North Korea. I was responding to your statement about this whole thing having started from 'a joke'; I'd also given up on trying to get anywhere. Apparently you lot don't like it when I give up on an argument, so perhaps I shouldn't.
Exactly, llwy after reading the whole forum through I find it kind of funny you're telling Frosty he can't speak of irc because he hasn't used it as much. It's wrong! Llqy you've been on irc, like, what, a year? Then there's the people who've been almost a decade in... you see when you told Frosty that it doesn't matter if he was on irc before you or not, well it really does matter. IRC hasn't probably changed a shit Ah, here we go, that's a bit better. You believe that IRC hasn't changed much since 2010, and that's a perfectly valid piece of reasoning that should have been out in the open from the start for the benefit of my weak mind. However, I refer you to my estimate above that 50% of links are marked, which was the original point, and you have not addressed it. Would you care to do so, or is that not important to you?

Does that... anything? I don't know what I'm doing here. I probably shouldn't have got involved in this business to begin with. I seem to be back on IRC but I'm not convinced I belong there at all. Heck, I'm not even sure I belong on this website. Buh. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:50, 2 Jul 2014

To be fair, the website's standards are higher than IRC's. IRC is a den of scum and villainy. Plus, it's only subtitles, like some silent-era movie but without the movie. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

That attitude explains why you never go there. You're one of the few people on this forum who has any sense in his head. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:49, 2 Jul 2014

I believe publishing IRC logs without the consent of those involved is against Freenode policy. Madclaw @ ^talk 17:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
"If you just want to publish a single conversation, be careful to get permission from each participant. Provide as much context as you can. Avoid the temptation to publish or distribute logs without permission in order to portray someone in a bad light. The reputation you save will most likely be your own." -- The Zombiebaron 18:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Llwy, I don't think madclaw and geeky being dicks is really citable evidence for anything. In my opinion, I do not like shock images at all I don't really see the merit or humour unless for some specific reason it works. However, for me I love how the IRC is such a relaxed and chilled place and we can talk about things that would possibly get us banned in other channels. The whole reason these guys moved from wikia was to get away from censorship, and now you want to bring it back. I could understand that you don't really connect with a gang of 20 year old boys who want to talk about watching porn but unfortunately that is what the majority of uncyclopedians consist of. So we can have VFD to filter the crap and keep the good on the website, the IRC crap will filter itself by being virtue of words you dont have to read and links you don't have to click on. And banning yourself from IRC was a bit much, but perhaps it is because you cannot stop yourself from openning the channel much like you apaprently cant stop yourself from opening shock images. Perhaps the answer is to make a separate safe for work channel? Would be nice to see you on IRC some time soon. - B@NZai k!tten

(Meow?)B 18:17, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Madclaw was harassing me. When Aimsplode harassed me Zombiebaron was eager to ban him, but this time I see nothing but an eagerness to blame the victim. I know, blaming the victim is easy because he (if you think I'm a sexy young girl, you ought to bash your head in with a brick) can't fight back. In any case, I'm banned now and I have absolutely no interest in going back there, and if you think it would be 'nice' to see me on IRC or that I'm promoting 'censorship' well you can just stuff all that into your mouth and swallow, because you're wrong. We don't need a separate channel because nobody gives a rat about the small minority of people who think it's necessary. You can have your depraved hellhole, excuse me, heavenly bliss all to yourself. The wicked witch is dead. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:53, 2 Jul 2014 Stricken. Sorry, that was too harsh. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:11, 2 Jul 2014

And since we're citing Freenode policy here, I found this: 'Avoid emotive speech. Slang pertaining to sex and sexual orientation, excretion and religious oaths is rarely used to discuss the applicability of those topics to your group's activities. In general, language with strong emotional content and only light meaning should be considered "emotive speech". It doesn't matter whether the language is socially acceptable or unacceptable. For example, use of the word "fsck" which does not refer to a Unix filesystem check is emotive. Similarly, use of the word "gay" which has nothing to do with homosexuality is emotive. Emotive speech raises the channel temperature.' – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:02, 2 Jul 2014

And this: 'Avoid sensitive material. Some users on freenode channels, particularly on public channels, are quite young. Others are parents or teachers who might have young children nearby. As you type comments or ASCII art, or post URLs for others to view, please consider the age range of other users on your channel, and respect the right of parents and teachers to decide when and if to expose the children in their charge to material or language which might offend, confuse or raise difficult issues.' Zombiebaron, you cited one piece of the policy that you and Madclaw like, but you ignored other parts that appear to forbid stuff you do right on the channel, including one that seems to relate directly to the original topic of this forum. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:06, 2 Jul 2014

I really wish you would stop namechecking me on this. This whole page is starting to get very confusing with you changing what it is you have a problem with. First the problem was specific images posted by Geeky, now you're saying the problem was Madclaw harassing you. I'm not sure how anybody is blaming the victim, we are just mostly trying to show you that you're wrong, but it's fairly clear you're not understanding us. In regards to the Aimsplode thing, I'd like to remind you that that was a very different thing that we handled in a very different way: privately. I have handled a number of harassment cases privately in the past; starting a forum vote to curb activities enjoyed by someone you feel is harassing you is really not a good way to handle it. In regards to the Freenode Guidelines, it is up to each individual to interpret and follow them as they see fit. The guidelines say not to post channel logs in public forums, and you chose not to follow that guideline, just as Geeky is free not to follow the guideline for links to sensitive material. -- The Zombiebaron 20:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I like pie. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:38, 2 Jul 2014

ZB: Namechecking? WTF? And BTW the whole "harassment" thing got struck, please note, you must have grabbed a copy before the striking went through -- what was left was the bit about Freenode policy which seems sorta relevant I'd think. -- LLyw's sock (Snarglefoop (talk)) some time in July

Hi Snargle. Here is a definition of namecheck. Saying things like "When Aimsplode harassed me Zombiebaron was eager to ban him, but this time I see nothing but an eagerness to blame the victim" and "Zombiebaron kept repeating that this perception was all in my head" is namechecking. If you read my edit summary I think it will clear up your confusion about the striking. -- The Zombiebaron 20:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I thought it was reasonably clear what namechecking meant and I don't understand why you are taking issue with it. Should I not name names when I have objections to things someone does? Do you not consider yourself to have done anything worthy of pointing out in such a manner? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:56, 2 Jul 2014

The problem I have with it is that you're making claims about things that I did which I don't agree that I did which sort of forces me to leave a reply saying that I don't think I did those things, which continues this drama. -- The Zombiebaron 21:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I still like pie. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:22, 2 Jul 2014

What kind of pie? - B@NZai k!tten

(Meow?)B 21:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

The kind that explodes. Really useful for getting people to go away; shame it doesn't actually exist. Not that I want you to go away, mind you. You're the more intelligent sort. That is, as opposed to a few others who ought to know who they are. Actually, I might well be referring to the whole lot of us. We're all lunatics, after all; doesn't that make us unfit to live in society? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:33, 4 Jul 2014

Shock Image!

Are you shocked? I know I am. It's like having someone leap out and shout "Boo!", except with a good book and a hot glass of green tea instead of the leaping and the shouting. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Everything is shocking in the right context. I was trying to do the Jesusy thing and knock one out to this and imagine my shock when I got to the bottom! Or did not in this case... :( I think the above image should be removed from User:Optimuschris/Super Secret Girlie Page! because it interferes with my pornography. It's simply shocking. J F C 16:17. Jul 2

Woo hoo! Here's another one! Snarglefoop (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

--Roman Dog Bird (talk) 21:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

i'm not fucking clicking that shit so

somebody describe to me (in graphic detail) what that particular gif is, please (i gather y'all call it "poopdick"?) --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Certainly RDB. Apparently the image in question or "poopdick" depicts 4 images. In the first is depicted the act of a man apparently defecating in a rather impressive straight tube like formation from his anus which is seen to pile his excrement in what might perhaps be a pyramid structure (made from one continuous tube) on a napkin on a stone tiled floor. It might be a terracotta floor, I can't tell. Possibly this gentleman's bathroom, or perhaps his local social club. The second image shows the same gentleman apparently filling a medical syringe with that excrement. The third illustrates how the filled syringe can then be used to insert said excrement into the gentleman's own penis. I assume the forth image demonstrates the apparent satisfaction which the gentleman can then obtain by squeezing his own penis, and forcing his own excrement to be pushed back out of it. J F C 16:10. Jul 2

Excess amount of short trousering on this particular forum thread. Weirdly impressive. --

RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

dang --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If I had to pass an opinion I would say it's all fake photographs. All part of a New World Order conspiracy to convince us all into Gaia Worship by virtue of believing that's it's possible for a human being to produce such a perfect poo. I simply don't think a man can poo that well, and never will. I think it's fake. J F C 20:06. Jul 2

I'm not sure whether I admire or hate people who can somehow turn everything into a joke and would rather do so than jump flaming into the fray. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:52, 2 Jul 2014

I'm not joking. I think the images are fake. One of them is obviously photoshopped. Also the promotion of Gaia worship by the NWO using propaganda such as these images is no laughing matter. The NWO knows that to stand any chance of controlling the future after the great awakening it will need to have converted mankind to worship a new religion. One that it can control. I suspect this image may be the final step in a plot starting with Goatse, moving through 2 girls one calculus equation, and then onto this image. I say... "Don't believe it kids. No man can poop that well". It's clearly a hoax... ?Jump into the fray? I will. Soon. J F C 21:55. Jul 2

Indeed. Now where's my pie? I want it yesterday. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:59, 2 Jul 2014

Pie Award

This user has been a good Uncyclopedian, and therefore gets pie.

KEEP YOUR GRUBBY HANDS OFF IT!

With extra helpings! J F C 22:02. Jul 2

I have no pie, but would you settle for a poopcake? Madclaw @ ^talk 09:20, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Man

What the fuck was this shit. pillow talk 22:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

A bit like this but with more poop, and reference to some place called "IRC" which apparently also contains a lot of poop. Basically it's about poop. What did you expect man? This is Uncyclopedia. J F C 23:41. Jul 3

This forum was a botched attempt at... I don't even remember what the point was anymore. I proposed something that I shouldn't have, because I got confused, and then after the fact I finally realised what I meant to say but by then nobody was listening. Or something like that. And now I'm all depressed and rambling about how everything is hopeless and life isn't worth living and all that fun stuff. At least, I would be if I didn't know better. That's probably not what's going on at all; it's just what I thought of, and of course I'm a raving lunatic so nothing I say is as it seems. Handle the oven mitts at your own risk. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:57, 4 Jul 2014

Stop going on about the fact that you are a raving lunatic. We know. Also.. We are also all raving lunatics ourselves, and so understand your predicament. This is Uncyclopedia after all, I have yet to meet a "normal" person here. Except <insert name here> who is OK I guess. J F C 01:05. Jul 4

I hate to burst your bubble, but <insert name here>'s in to some seriously creepy shit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:13, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

<insert name here> should be wiped off the face of the earth. <insert name here> is an androgynous bag of rotten kitty litter who stays up late editing retarded wikis that rot his brain... oh wait, that's me. I'm also not funny. At all. I'm a terrifyingly serious person who scares children in their sleep. Probably. Isn't that what admins are for? No, that's monsters. I keep getting my creepy critters mixed up. It's not hard to do, mind you, seeing as they're all creepy, scary, slimy and rotten-smelling - but they'd be so terribly unhappy if they knew we were committing the politically incorrect faux pas of crediting them with the wrong set of misdeeds. On the other hand, though, aren't admins supposed to be shiny? Why the hell am I talking about them, anyhow? Bunch of useless unchanged cat boxes... getting into everything and making it sticky. Oh so horridly sticky. Why do I plead with the world to listen? It's like trying to get blood out of a stone, or trying to dent the wall by banging the door into it, or trying to finish a sentence... except finishing a sentence is incredibly easy; the only trouble with it is that you can't say anything that actually means something, see, you can only say things that are content-free. But this is not the place to discuss that, oh, no. I don't know what we're really supposed to be discussing here. Probably nothing good - which brings me back to the fact that I seem to have become terribly depressed, and of course none of you lot care because I'm just this random loony person who goes around dumping cat litter on people's heads. Or something. You never know, do you? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:28, 4 Jul 2014

— S G 1|Hereish ^{[citation needed]} 03:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Hank/Supergeeky1. User:Matthlock/sig2 18:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Not to sound like Spike

But stop all this wank and get back to writing funny articles! Leverage (talk) 09:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

"Funny articles"? And break our losing streak? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ WHAT LEVERAGE SAID ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)

00:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

This is why I wear underwear made from flesh eating ladybugs! --ShabiDOO 11:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

There's drama I wasn't invited to? TIME FOR ME TO ADD MORE™

Alright, since there's no way to enforce who posts what, I think that all nsfw stuff should be tagged as such, and illegal images earn a ban and be reported. Of course, I don't have much of a stake in this because I'm still on the AKICK list for #uncyclopedia. But opinions never hurt people, so have mine. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 19:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Also, this shindig will end in no less than 2 bans and a deopping. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 19:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

There is a way to enforce who posts what. I think a copy of all suspected "porn" or "shock images" should be placed on my talk page. I will give an evaluation of the porn / shock image and decide for each if it is A: "Worth wanking over" or B: "Not worth wanking over". Only images which are worth wanking over should be allowed to be post in IRC. Mr N

20:00. Jul 12

Sounds good to me. So a picture of really hot tits would go in A, and an image of a blumpkin would go into B, for example. User:Matthlock/sig2 00:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. Obviously each case would need to be decided on case by case basis. Mr N

01:16. Jul 13

[1] With a few exceptions. Some NSFW things are assumed to go without saying, for instance anything Mr-Ex says or links.

[2] Of Mr-Ex.

[3] Before you say 'oh she's just putting herself down again', I believe I am only stating the obvious, at least from your point of view.

[4] I'm not saying Uncyclopedia and IRC should have the same standards; they probably shouldn't.

[5] They're also the kind of joke Spike would object to. I know, I'm Spike blah blah. True story.

[6] Unless there is something very, very wrong with you.

[7] I refer here to my detractors. In spite of Zombiebaron's comment above, my impression is that the 'community' is in fact heavily divided on this issue.

[8] This entire paragraph is an opinion. Form another opinion about it at your own risk.

[9] Reminds me a little of this.

[10] This is supposed to be a joke.

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

Forum:Vote: shock images on IRC

Contents

Vote

This is going nowhere fast

Shock Image!

i'm not fucking clicking that shit so

Man

Not to sound like Spike

There's drama I wasn't invited to? TIME FOR ME TO ADD MORE™

Navigation menu

Forum:Vote: shock images on IRC

Vote

This is going nowhere fast

Shock Image!

i'm not fucking clicking that shit so

Man

Not to sound like Spike

There's drama I wasn't invited to? TIME FOR ME TO ADD MORE™

Navigation menu

Search