Forum:A thread for discussion of the subject of the reporting of the various bugs of the Uncyclopedia

Forums: Index > Village Dump > A thread for discussion of the subject of the reporting of the various bugs of the Uncyclopedia

Note: This topic has been unedited for 3927 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Post bug reports here, or face the wrath of Wabbajack!

Wabbajack.

It is absolutely OK to bump this forum. If the edit tab is unavailable, click here.

COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS go at the bottom.

ADMINISTRATORS: When closing a bug report, please add the |closed_by parameter with your signature, then move it to the top of #Resolved bugs. Bug reports that aren't bugs go here.

EVERYBODY ELSE: Please check to see if your bug is one of these before posting your bug report AT THE TOP of #Current bugs!

1. PHP ERRORS

   If you see lines on the top of the page like PHP Warning or whatever, be a dear and copy/paste that for us along with what page you saw that on and what you were doing at the time so we can better look into the issue.

2. "Array to string conversion ...on line 1522"

   If you are getting this notice, that's a known issue, so you don't need to post it unless the page is broken otherwise.

3. Broken redirects

   If you come across a redirect which points to a page which exists, but shows a red link, do a "null edit" on the redirect (click the "edit" tab, insert a space somewhere, click "save"). This should fix it.

4. The new edit window is "icky"!

   And I quote: "...you can turn it off in your preferences. Go to editing, uncheck 'enhanced editing toolbar' under beta features, and if you want the old one instead, make sure 'Show edit toolbar (requires JavaScript)' is checked. -— Lyrithya ༆ 16:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)"

Current bugs

Place new bugs at the top! Just toss your bug up here like so:

{{Bug report
|header= Short description of the bug
|description= In-depth description of your bug, with your signature (~~~~)
}}

Bug report: Image error (possibly related to the issue Special:UnusedFiles)

Description: File:FF popup.gif is showing a weird error that prevents it from being displayed. The error message is unreadable on the file page but you can see the some text on here: "Error creating thumbnail: convert: malloc.c:2451: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2]))" In addition, unused files I've deleted continue to show up on the list even after the cache is updated. MadMax (talk) 21:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Have no clue what's up with that image; let me know if you see any more like it. I'm going to attempt to fix it. On the unused files still showing up... I'll check it out. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Apr 30 '13 2:17 (UTC) File:BFF4EVR.gif is also generating a similar error code: "Error creating thumbnail: convert: malloc.c:2451: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long)old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed." MadMax (talk) 18:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Bug report: Imagemagick rendering contrast issues

Description: Apparently it's mishandling some png thumbs, possibly just grey files - see File:Sophia-Loren.png (RGB) and File:Sophia-rocks.png (grayscale). And yeah, I'll probably wind up having to fix this myself, but at here's a note, either as a reminder or in case someone else wants to look into it. -— Lyrithya ༆ 02:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC) Okee dokee. We know we have an issue with imagemagick, and we're working on it. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Mar 16 '13 22:37 (UTC)

Bug report: Invalid Pages from a long ass time ago

Description: There are any one of a number of titles that are bad and so the contents were unreachable on the front end such as [[Talk:Talk:Main Page]] Notice how I didn't use <nowiki> there. I'll work on compiling a full list here. Mike the Great (talk) 23:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Shit, I didn't include redirects in my scan. If you guys wipe out those pages I'll do another scan to include them. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike the Great (talk • contribs) WHATTTTTTTTTTTT? Is it Mike the Great? From ED? --—  (talk) (contributions) 22:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Bug report: TheHappySpaceman's user page

Description: My userpage is all screwed up. Not only does the sigexpand code not work, but a few of the images don't seem to have been transferred properly. ~[ths] UotM 01:50, 01/08/2013 @Dan: Since nopony wants to answer your question, I'll answer it: you're screwed. Ha ha! -- Кıяву Тαгк Сойтяıвs 2013-01-11T01:20 If it's still broken, I'm afraid you'll have to try to update the code yourself to use the current formatting and such. If you notice any wider issues that might be causing trouble in general, in particular on other pages, please report those as well. (I couldn't find any, but didn't look too hard.) -— Lyrithya ༆ 18:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC) Oh nonononono, you don't understand. My userpage used to only display the menu at the upper right hand corner of the screen when hovered over, but now it displays it all the time. DO NOT WANT. And many of the images have somehow stopped working. DO NOT WANT. Not only that, but I found a bug on this page that I also found on the "Redundancy" page: the fake edit buttons on the side of <h2> tags have stopped working. DO NOT WANT. And I have no idea how to fix any of this, and the bug still isn't resolved. So in other words, I'm moving it back to "Current Bugs" until it is fully resolved. ~[ths] UotM 21:19, 01/12/2013 I can probably fix that for ya THS, but I've got a shitload of other stuff what needs a-doin' first, so it may be a while. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 13 '13 22:15 (UTC) Okay, for the record, many of the issues I've brought up have been fixed (thanks, Lyrithya). The only one that hasn't was the fake "edit" button that is still a problem on my userpage and on the Redundancy page. ~[ths] UotM 22:25, 01/19/2013

Bug report: Edit window link suggestion is slow

Description: The in page search function is moving slow if at all (I don't know the tech term, it's when you do a search while editing by started it [[HowTo:Beet , and then the "off" doesn't show as an option). This goes for pics [[File:Abra , as well, although Wikia uncy doesn't in-page file pics where you can scan the pics by using the up and down aarows. I too am amazed at how much work and time a group of people have put into this, and it's lucky we have coding geniuses so interested in keeping this site afloat. Thanks. Aleister 14:17 7-1-'13 I'm not too sure how this is supposed to work, because my Internet connection is so slow that I usually have Javascript turned off, and so I've never used the feature. Could be an issue with the new fancy editor. Try Lyrithya's advice from up above: “ Alternately you can turn [the new editor] off in your preferences. Go to editing, uncheck 'enhanced editing toolbar' under beta features, and if you want the old one instead, make sure 'Show edit toolbar (requires JavaScript)' is checked. ”  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 7 '13 14:39 (UTC) If I understood you I'd do it, but I'll try it later. You've never used it? That's how I do almost all my links and used to do lots of pictures, you could get an entire list of existing pages, and used to get a list of pictures which you could schroll down using the up and down keys. Both tools are among my favorites on uncyclopedia. Thanks for doing all those in=page pop=jups yesterday, that was tedious work. I found a few more but I'll try to do them later following your code. Aleister 16:56 7--1--'13 Sometimes the options dropdown list appears somewhere else on the screen. I've noticed it. If it still isn't there, idk.--ڰโ٣ Ṗ€Áʃeɰɧĩʐʑ ďé Ňөщ Y০гk Ťá|k & ЯерlЧ Ѕтаlк 21:31, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Al: it turns out that particular feature is an extension to the software here, so I'll see if I can bug somebody who knows how it works and see if it's improperly configured or something. It does seem to act a little funky for me, as well. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jan 8 '13 4:39 (UTC)

Bug report: {{Logo}} issues

Description: The little green man in the top left corner of the Featured template that says FEATURED! is too far down on the page, hardly in the top left corner at all! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Unless I'm mistaken the site notice is pushing that down, along with a couple other things. The colonized logo on the top of the Great Britain page, along with the page Aleister posted above are having the same issue. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 04:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Anything which uses "absolute position" HTML attributes to try to paste text or images over top of the page title area or the site logo is likely not working, as a position which might've looked OK in monobook is usually a wee bit too low on the page on vector. There are better ways to do this sort of thing; the 'displaytitle' function in MediaWiki or installation of extensions to override logos on a per-page basis or insert CSS into individual pages. Carlb (talk) 03:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC) I don't understand a word you're saying. Aleister 3:15 5-1-'13 A <css> </css> plugin could be useful indeed. Otherwise, there is a solution for the logo-alignment problem: use the same id, but insert different values for those same id at vector.css or monobook.css. R7 (NL) 14:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC) The <css> tag code (as used on nl: pt: et al.) was posted to mw:Extension_talk:NewPageCSS#Outputs_nonsense. There is another Extension:CSS which does the same job but with different syntax, #css: as a parser tag. Either would be useful. Carlb (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC) The latter is already installed, but neither, for security reasons, support image backgrounds. -— Lyrithya ༆ 02:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC) It looks like someone needs to write a js to reposition the featured stamp, since the vector skin doesn't have any good hooks for an extension to use (and skizzerz' idea of putting it in the logo image was brilliant but unfortunately just didn't work). js would work perfectly to account for the sitenotice which is added in js anyway, the main thing apt to push the stamp down, and also for long titles, though anyone with js off will still see a mis-positioned stamp for the latter. -— Lyrithya ༆ 16:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Now when I read about putting the featured image in the logo, I was thinking about the constructure of #p-logo, which excists out of "#p-logo" and "#p-logo a". Now, normally, the image itself is located at #p-logo a, which causes it to click on it to go to the main page. When I move this background-image from #p-logo a to #p-logo itself, and putting the featured image instead on #p-logo a, it is placed above the potato and is adjustable with (negative) margins and paddings. I think this will fix it. Only thing to rethink about is namespaces. This only does work with main-space articles. Or there must be all different sorts of templates be created for those namespaces. #p-logo { background-image: url("http://images.uncyclomedia.co/uncyclopedia/en/b/bc/Wiki.png") !important; background-repeat: no-repeat !important; background-position: 50% 50% !important; } #p-logo a { background-image: url("http://images.uncyclomedia.co/uncyclopedia/en/thumb/2/2f/Featured.png/190px-Featured.png") !important; background-repeat: no-repeat !important; background-position: -5px 40% !important; padding-left:10px !important; margin-left:-10px !important; padding-right:20px !important; } For me, this just works nice. By the way, these <nowiki>'s in the source code should be gone of course. R7 (NL) 12:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Resolved bugs

Please put resolved bugs on top! Thanks.

Move 'em here for when things get resolved -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Should we start to cross out the ones that are finished? Might make it easier to look over the still-problematic ones. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 04:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking like this -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Archives:

• archive 1
• archive 2

Resolved issue: I can't remove
Description: ...The contruction tag off my Kobayashi Maru page. Can anyone help me? Lord Scofield Stark 17:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC) I've had this problem too while going through the backlog at Category:Work In Progress. MadMax (talk) 01:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Yeah, me too. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 01:07 1 July 2013 This may be an abuse filter. I'll check, and by that, I mean I'll have somebody check. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 2 '13 1:59 (UTC) Sorry, this was my fault. It should be fixed now (for a few days now). Legoktm (talk) 01:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Closed by:  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 17 '13 1:56 (UTC)

Wabbajack

For things that used to be bugs but were Wabbajacked into not-bugs, or not-bugs that need to be Wabbajacked into bugs. Or sweetrolls. Sweetrolls work too.

• Wabbajack archive

Comments/Questions

If I might say...

I find it astounding you managed to get the whole site moved with only this many errors. I love you guys. ---MasterWangs CUNT and proud of it! 05:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Dude, you should see the errors on the server-side. Place is like a jungle filled with rape machines. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 7 '13 13:15 (UTC)

Fixing red links in WantedPages

Would it be alright to start redirecting pages in Special:WantedPages? Automobile, for example, should redirect to Car but are pages still being imported at this point? There are also miscellaneous pages currently listed (e.g. [[%PAGE%‏‎]], [[M:Religion and Wikipedia‏‎]], and various interwiki links) that link up to 100+ articles. MadMax (talk) 13:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

We should have all the pages imported, so have at it. Only thing I know of that's still missing are some files (and only the files themselves, not the description pages) and we should have those in the next couple days. -— Lyrithya ༆ 21:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks. MadMax (talk) 21:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Fixing links to wikia

I think I've gotten most of the external links pointing to the old wikia site. I'm assuming specific mentions on articles, talk, and user pages (e.g. John Scherer/Outrage!/Response) are to be left alone?

There's a lot of nomination pages on VFH, Pee Review, etc. that use the wikia.com address in the title. Similarly, there's links on plenty of the forums as well. There were some wikia image links that wouldn't display in preview when I tried fixing them. Will external links for uncyclopedia.org need to be changed too? MadMax (talk) 17:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Technically, everything is adjustable, but I don't know what Uncyc's userpage policy says: is someone's userpage entirely his property, or can we make the changes which are - in my view - not harmful to the content's context? We're basicly not wiping out every W*k*a-link from the article base since each change to the content is logged in the page history. But hey: what about using a robot? There must be scripts around somewhere | Cartoonist | Spit it out! | 03:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The problem with a script is that several of them have context, examples coming from the move to the wikia domain in 2008 from the .org domain and if we got a robot to do it they would also be changed and whilst they do point to the wikia site they sort of need to. Futhermore several hundred exist in forums which would all be bumped which is bad. For now it's safer to do in manually, I'm mainly working on diffs and whatnot on talk archives and the odd one in mainspace. These can be corrected because otherwise it doesn't make much sense, also it gives more links to this site which will boast are search engine ratings. But yeah not everything needs changing... As for the .org links I thought Skully changed them all last April but yes they should be updated too as they redirect to the Wikia site. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Broken images

I've been going through the Category:Pages with broken file links and have run across some problems. These mostly concern files that have been mistakenly deleted as unused images.

1. Trying to restore a file for an image deleted prior to 2011will result in an error message. This also occurred on the old website, so I assume its not related to the move, but I just thought I'd mention it.
2. Successfully restoring files does not remove the page from the broken links category even after several days.
3. Files from imported pages do not exist despite a record of it being uploaded (e.g. EMC's File:Anuslogo.jpg).

In addition, I'm seeing a few external image links that are broken in non-mainspace pages. I was able to repair some of these when I was fixing the links to wikia but it didn't always work (I noted those I wasn't able to fix in the edit summary). Should wikia image links be changed to uncyclomedia.co? MadMax (talk) 12:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

A significant number of the files hosted on site as of January 2010 were moved over to the mirror, as we're a large number of files (but not all) hosted as of early to mid 2012. You may also be able to locate files using wayback machine. Obviously this isn't a technical fix as much as it is an advantage in having back-ups off site of site content. I also created User:Puppy/image as a way of determining what file pages we had and where they were used. Note this only reflects the file pages - it doesn't determine the images themselves.

My experimentation with Category:Pages with broken file links elsewhere showed me that this category was not dynamic. The pages that were shown were those that had broken file links at the time the page was last updated. (Or at least, I think that's how it worked.) this means you'll get false positives in there as well as not covering reflecting pages that develop broken links when a file is deleted. Or - in other words - it's pretty useless. I did consider a DPL solution to address this at one stage but the server load that it presented was pretty heavy, and it crashed more often than it worked, unless I stripped the bulk of the variables out of it, which then made it too slow and with too few results to be worthwhile.

The next option is to run a not that looks for links in a page that are file creation links - so for instance File:This does not exist creates http://server name/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=file name as URL encoded. Once you have a listing of files then searching other wikis for the link to the media via [[Media:file name]] is a matter of simple cut and paste. I also have a script a friend of mine out together that will import images on a large scale based upon the URIs of the image files.

Hope that helps. If not, then not much else I can do to assist. Nominally Humane! 03:11 13 Feb

Oh, and File:Anuslogo.jpg will reflect a page, whereas Media:Anuslogo.jpg will reflect the file itself. Hence the redlink can be useful. Especially when worked into a DPL that displays files. Nominally Humane! 03:17 13 Feb

That does help, thanks. I've found that editing a page a second time (after the broken image is fixed) will remove it from the category. I've been going through Special:UnusedFiles and listing missing files at Uncyclopedia:RadicalX's Corner. The majority I've found, however, are linked to inactive user pages. Is there a shortcut I could use to find missing files in mainspace articles instead of searching them one by one? MadMax (talk) 08:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Status of ICU

I noticed the articles on Category:ICU have been listed since early-January (and currently appear as redirects in the category). Should these be deleted? MadMax (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hea Max. Think I got em. They must have slipped through the cracks somehow as they did not show up at UN:M. MrN 17:20, Feb 13

Thanks. MadMax (talk) 08:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Am I just dreaming or...

But I can't find the QVFD-button anymore? Is it broken or is it in no use anymore? Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:34, 23 February, 2013 (UTC)

You're not dreaming; the code behind it was broken because it uses something called "YUI", which isn't standard on MediaWiki. I'm gonna rewrite it. Should be available shortly! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Feb 27 '13 2:40 (UTC)

Wonderful, thanks! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 09:56, 4 March, 2013 (UTC)

More minor issues

1. Broken files I've deleted are appearing in Special:UnusedFiles even after the cache is updated.
2. A few pages are appearing in categories as redirects (e.g. Bob Dylan in Category:American musicians.
3. I can't seem to find the spam filter to block text from pages. Was this brought over during the move (I notice the exclude title feature is not included on Special:WantedPages now)?
4. I used to be able to search the backlog of Special:WantedPages on the old site, bypassing the 1,000 limit cache, by using this link. Apparently, this is no longer working. MadMax (talk) 08:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Bob Dylan, I've fixed that one instance by making a null edit to the page. I'm currently investigating what seems to be widespread database corruption with the page_is_redirect field. Legoktm (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

File reverting

For a long time, I've been bugged by a user called TheHauntingHour2. I'm sick of his stupid edits but now, thanks to him, I found a weird bug. He reverted to a version that was done at 2007 (and reverted back then), I reverted him and now the shit is somehow broken. Take a close look at the thumbnails and to the versions I reverted. I first reverted him to the latest version (before him), which showed me the thumbnail of his edit. Which was weird. So, aware that I did something, I reverted myself to Haunting's edit (yes, the same one I tried to revert...), and the thumbnail was the same, altough the thumbnail from the HISTORY OF THE REVERTING HAD CHANGED! So, I reverted myself again to the same version of my first revert (yes, I know this is confusing), and now it looks the same as HH's edit.. It's pretty confusing but take a look. What is this madness? Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 16:04, 25 July, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, so I've found the reason for this. This one is really fucked up sdo listen up carefully:

So, first of all, this is partly my fault. Once I get back to home with a better computer, I'll fix up everything because this needs file downloading and uploading again. Sorry, REALLY. Here comes the important part:

This is a big glitch that may destroy the whole file-reverting system. IF one, like HauntingHour, makes a bad new version of a file AND YOU UNDO HIM FIRST BEFORE PRESSING THE FILE REVERT-BUTTON down somewhere there, it's game over :( I did this mistake, first rollbacked his edits (which does not do a thing as I noticed) and after notiving nothing happened, noticing the file revert-button and pressing it THEN. This causes the file to die, you see, making reverting almost impossible. I did this on few first cases, and afterwards noticed there's a connection. I tested it WITHOUT rollbacking/undoing and file reverting worked finely. See his contributions for example. I'm sorry for this, it was an accident. I'll fix up things after few weeks. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 16:19, 27 July, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, seeing over his contribs SOME MORE it seems he has broken himself too some files. See this. Actually I haven't been responsible of the breaking up at all, it seems he has fucked up things himself, altough not all. Some of them were broken BEFORE I did some of my edits, it seems. So, I've asked this before and I ask it again; could someone ban this guy? If not for terrible edits, but for file destroying as well. I'll put him to BP. I'm SICK of him, seriously. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 16:25, 27 July, 2013 (UTC)

Disabling Forum talk pages

I notice that UnNews blocks the discussion tab on its main page. Could something similar be applied to the Village Dump? It seems to be a semi-regular target for spambots recently. MadMax (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Blocking the tab doesn't do much, as I believe those spambots never even see the actual page -- they just use the API. Best idea would be to set up an abuse filter rule that prevents people from editing that "namespace". I'll get Lyrithya or somebody on that. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Apr 30 '13 2:02 (UTC)

I've set up Special:AbuseFilter/25 which prevents the creation of any new pages in the forum talk namespace. Legoktm (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Spambots

There's been a few persistent spambot active on the site lately. I've blocked more than a few of them over the past week but they keep coming back. They use a wide range of addresses but usually repeat the same phrases in edit summaries:

1. "Knight intends to champion for aeration Loew differences to renew love rears?"
2. "Magic interested in chasing Paul substitute to get the blood out of the number one scorer"

Each spams these websites:

1. [1]
2. [2]
3. [3]
4. [4]
5. [5]
6. [6]
7. [7]
8. [8]
9. [9]
10. [10]
11. [11]
12. [12]
13. [13]
14. [14]
15. [15]
16. [16]

Can these phrases or domain names be blocked by the abuse filter? MadMax (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

In addition, accounts are being created by spammers (typically using a combination of letters and numbers) to post ads on their user pages. MadMax (talk) 04:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The word "vuitton" should also be blocked. MadMax (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Legotkm added some abuse filters from mediawiki.org, and he says they should work. I'll check back later to see. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 17 '13 2:23 (UTC)

There's a new batch of spammers using an account with a first name ending in two or three numbers (e.g. John123). Multiple accounts seem to be created at the same time. Since the forum is getting locked every few days should this thread be moved to a more official page? MadMax (talk) 21:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

We should have the abuse filter deny any page to be created with the combo of 1 external link, and no sections, created by a non-autoconfirmed user. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 Insight into the mind of an aspergian: 21:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Actually, no external links for non-autoconfirmed users. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 Insight into the mind of an aspergian: 21:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

To change up my idea moar, try extending the time it takes to get autoconfirmed. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 Insight into the mind of an aspergian: 18:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Username not found

I tried to edit a page in the username space it says "User account "username" is not registered. Please check if you want to create or edit this page. Any help? -- MagicBus All aboard! 17:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Um, when we say "create a page in userspace, we mean User:MagicBus/Some page name or something of that sort. Not at "User:Username/whatever"  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Aug 16 '13 21:06 (UTC)