Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Use a wooden condom

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Why?:Use a wooden condom (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Why?:Use a wooden condom	Score: 19 proud owners of a Woodos condom
Nominated by:	SNF = - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 17:50, Dec 29
For: 21	Self Nomination and Foring of the Self - I really really like this, and hope <insert name here> will too! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 17:50, Dec 29 For --Æ 17:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Yeah. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:54, Dec 29  For. A lot of hard work gone into this one (No pun intended). --OliverKnight 16:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC) For - Great article. Brings a whole new meaning to "I got wood".-- Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 19:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC) For - My admiration for wooden rubbers rose the further I read. Latex is so passe. --Shambles 09:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC) For - Now my girlfriend wants to get me one for my birthday. I just hope they're sanded as well as you claim. --Dr. Love 03:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)  For her pleasure. -->:( 03:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)  For. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 09:38, Jan. 1, 2008 09:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC) For. Yeah, this is good. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 'For Watch for splinters! GopherKiller Questions? Comments? 01:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)  For. - Haha I loved the custom shop section :) (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 5, 18:19 For. Nice article. I'm sure <insert name here> will enjoy it too. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 23:45 5 Jan, 2008) For - Ow, my penis! --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 04:51, Jan. 6, 2008  For. Wow, a real gentleman! I'm swooning over here... ~Formerly Annoying Crap 02:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC) For Yep, I remember this very well.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 7 (03:22) Penis     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   05:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)   For. I found it a very pleasurable read. Shouldn't be a Why?, though. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)  For. It's weird. We dutchlanders apply the same concept to foot-wear. It oinks me boink. -- di Mario 22:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)  For. Excellent Idea and well exucuted. Can't really ask for more. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC) For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 2	Dammit really great intro, but lost steam way too quickly. --THINKER 16:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)  Against. Condominable!! --Randy Bentwick 16:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain There is a presence of guilt all around me, as UnIdiot came to me for a lot of counsel on the making of this article. I still think it's a very good concept, the article is still just missing something. Something big. Something very hard for me to really put my finger on at the moment. Or throughout most of the creation of the article. This comment is far too long. -RAHB 22:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.