Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Obama Nobel prize unjustified

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Obama Nobel prize unjustified (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Obama Nobel prize unjustified	Score: -4.5 totally justified Nobel Peace Prizes
Nominated by:	—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:32, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
For: 5.5	Nom & For. Good stuff from Clemens. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:32, October 11, 2009 (UTC) For. Almost a Mr Angry article by Clemens. Needs an illustration/photo though. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:55, October 11, 2009 (UTC) For. For fast composition. But the title sounds better reversed as "justified" followed by this article. Title was best on home page news headline, other wise the title kind of gives away the joke. Funnybony 19:21, October 11, 2009 (UTC) For. Well written and enjoyable. ChiefjusticeDS 21:51, October 11, 2009 (UTC) For. Good satire. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:12, 11 October 2009 For. per above. Mn-z 01:29, October 12, 2009 (UTC) For Could be tighter, but funny – Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.114.182 (talk • contribs)
Against: 10	Against. Both stupid and nasty. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:00, October 11, 2009 (UTC) Against. Political diatribes on the whole aren't that funny. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:40, October 11, 2009 (UTC) Against. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:15, October 12, 2009 (UTC) Against. Felt very obvious, unsubtle, and not funny to me. I've already seen far better takes on this whole story. --UU - natter 09:20, Oct 12 Against. Per UU and the fact that the author is a worthless piece of shit. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:56, 12 Oct Against. It might be accurate, but it's not funny at all. –Flashfreez 08:13, October 14, 2009 (UTC) Against. Blatantly unoriginal. pillow talk 15:48, October 14, 2009 (UTC) owned just like Clemens (sorry that was rather bad taste) -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 18:20, Oct 14 Not clever, not funny, written by a faggot. This article has so much going against itself. I request deletion. --A brutal, facist dictator in the making 18:25, October 14, 2009 (UTC) Speeding up the process. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 19:16, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. Didn't know what this was all about until I clicked the link at the bottom, and once you explain the joke... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 03:19, Oct 11 Yes, what happens then? What happens when you explain a joke? I need to know! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:59, 11 October 2009 T'ain't funny no more. :( • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 23:00, Oct 11 Oh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:11, 11 October 2009 The author doesn't deserve a feature. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:03, 14 October 2009

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH