Uncyclopedia:VFH/Secret Governmental Report Number 244212

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Secret Governmental Report Number 244212 (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Secret Governmental Report Number 244212	Score: 8 Sceptics
Nominated by:	Sycamore (Talk) 15:01, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
For: 12.5	Nomination and For. Lucifer Rising... for the Arthur C. Clarke fans out there.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:01, June 14, 2011 (UTC) for I like it and but it needs more touch! Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 06:34, June 15, 2011 (UTC)  4 |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 12:11, June 17, 2011 (UTC) For. This is brilliant. Frickin helarious! ShabiDOO 17:50, June 16, 2011 (UTC)  For. It's good! I think it's better than some other features.--Funnybony    12:29, Jun 17  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:27, 17 June 2011  Completely Unreluctant For. I love this: it's a perfect representation of our glorious country. If we had eight minutes left on this earth, we would use it trying to sell as many T-shirts as possible. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 05:38 June 23, 2011 (UTC) For. I like it. MadMax 06:07, June 23, 2011 (UTC) For. Funnybony    07:04, Jun 23 07:04, June 23, 2011 (UTC)---Opps!!? Sorry, I voted twice without checking. Pretty dumb, huh!?--Funnybony    20:36, Jul 2 For. 108.56.236.56 20:58, June 28, 2011 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 22:34, July 1, 2011 (UTC) For. Sure thang. Black Flamingo 01:22, July 3, 2011 (UTC)  For. Why Not?---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 14:56, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 4.5	Against. I LOL'd but the end of the article needs a lot more funny's. the pictures are funny though Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 06:11, June 15, 2011 (UTC) Reluctant against. There's not much here that prevented me from voting for. It is beautifully written and an entertaining read, but it could use a little more jokes. It's like 2 or 3 jokes away from being great. Awesome concept too. Mattsnow 22:21, June 16, 2011 (UTC) Your comment is helpful, and your ability to develop reasoned arguments is second to none...--Sycamore (Talk) 13:47, June 17, 2011 (UTC) Thank you Sycamore, I always feel bad about voting against. But I feel if some changes that would not "rape" the concept and add a couple of quality jokes in here, my vote could switch. (humor is FUCKING SERIOUS BUSINESS) lol. No it isn't. The thing is to have fun, and I had while reading it. Honest. Mattsnow 05:24, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Second Reluctant Against. Pretty much per Mattsnow, it's good and well written but just a bit short on the humour, mainly at the end. With a few tweaks it will be feature worthy I'm sure. Nameable • mumble? 16:10, June 17, 2011 (UTC) Against. Don't really know what this is about. The first paragraph doesn't give any clues either. Sorry. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:00, June 24, 2011 (UTC) Against. 118.96.43.101 11:55, July 9, 2011 (UTC)  VFD → L A B O R A T O R I E S 19:01, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Romy, the 1st para told me ""Recent studies have shown that in all likihood the Sun will asplode one day, time is of affliction",<---that's what its about. Cheers!--Funnybony    20:40, Jul 2 The glass remains clouded. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:23, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH