From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Maddox
|
Score: 5 Angry Pirates
|
| Nominated by:
|
For: 15
|
- For! The funniest part is about how it bashes uncyclopedia
- Actually, I've kinda liked this article for a while. Dunno how accessible it is, but I find it amusing. We could even do a whole maddox-tribute reskin, if we wanted. - Don Leddy the Crunch
 (Nyah, see, nyah!) 23:10, Jun 7
- For, Perfect. - UnIdiot |
 | Talk | Contribs - 01:44, Jun 8
- For --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 02:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- For
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- For Reskinning the front page and featuring. Per Led I've also liked this one for a long time, likely because I'm a devout Maddox fan. -RAHB 07:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Arr! ~ ★ БурекСП ★★ талк ★★ контриб ★ 10:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Dig well done, whichever of the 40 contributors made it enjoyable. --THINKER 15:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- I... I don't get it... for Le Cejak • <16:35, 08 Jun 2008>
- For. I love Maddox. This article follows Maddox's formula, and is thus awesome. Also, it's supposed to look like crap, because his site looks like crap. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:24 Jun 08, 2008
- ForFou-Lu 00:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- F♥r. Used to be a bit of a Maddox fan. Now, not so much (after reading his bit on Mac owners) but I still like this article for properly satirizing him. Well done. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:06 Jun 9
- For Pasta of Muppets 06:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- For. --Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:15, Jun. 12, 2008
- For --G'orzak the Dubious 16:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 10
|
- Against. It's based on an actual webpage, which wouldn't be a strike against, ordinarily, but that webpage sucks, isn't funny and isn't much else, either. This page follows its formula, with similar results. Am I a crank? Perhaps. More reasonably, perhaps my sense of humour is too mature for such tomfoolery. /me lights pipe, sits by fireplace to read some Chaucer Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- /me looks up from reading Thackeray and pours MO a glass of sherry. Oh and against. -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- Against. Not a big fan of Maddox at all, and I just don't find it to be that good of a parody of his website. --
 Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 18:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't get it.... against. Also are we really going to feature something which looks like this mess? MrN
 18:58, Jun 8
- Nah I don't mind Maddox's stuff in very small doses, but this doesn't really do it for me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Against - It sort of seems like Maddox's website is a better parody of Maddox's website than is this article. --Hyperbole 01:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 Against.--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)- Weak Against - Did somebody ask for a reskin? Actually, I haven't touched that for months and I need to redo it. Anyway, even though I'm a huge Maddox fan, and I know my friend Little Jimmy would love for this article to be featured, I'm just not very enthusiatic about it. – Kip > Talk • Works ••
        09:33, Jun. 10, 2008
- Against For all the reasons already stated. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:55, 13 Jun
- Against While it is a good satirizing of his site, it just isn't funny enough to be featured, in my opinion. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Against.--— 
