From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: HowTo:Write A Funny Band Article
|
Score: 14 bands who are teh roxxors!
|
| Nominated by:
|
SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:57, Apr 23
|
For: 17
|
- Nom & For. As VFH is still a trifle on the anaemic side, I offer up this, which I reviewed a while back and enjoyed. Yeah, it may be a tad in-jokey or self referential or whatever, but it's funny and I think it says much that people need to hear. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:57, Apr 23
- For Not bad at all... MrN
 20:44, Apr 24
- For. It could us another picture, though. Emo, probably. Back in my day, we didn't have Emos. We only had Emus, which were big, flightless birds that wrote poetry and cut themselves. As time went on, they got jobs and, by the 1970's, joined the establishment, becoming ostriches. I kid you not. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- For featuring this, and then giving it a blurb in HTBFANJS. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:15, Apr 24
- For what Led sed. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN20:02, 26 Apr
- Agreed because it actually is helpful, but in a perfectly satirical way. Whatever that means. --
 Spillin DylanTALKEDITS 04:26, April 27 2008
- For. Very well written. More votes!! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 14:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- For Though the prose in some areas could use a bit of cleanup -RAHB 05:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- For This article could really help to make people finally see the...oh, who am I kidding. Still, now people have polished it up, it looks worthy enough. -
This person wrote an article which became one of the Featured Articles on Uncyclopedia. Ain't they clever?!
16:27 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Funny, and a good public service message for the front page. Only complaint is the Paris Hilton picture should be replaced because she isn't famous so much for her music as for... you know, that stuff she does to be famous... --So So 01:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 03:07, May. 18, 2008
- Frie --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  23:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Dig works for me. --THINKER 04:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- ForFou-Lu 01:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Flip-flop You know, considering that Under_user has shown that there's precedent for Uncyclopedia-themed articles, and considering that I've cited this article like three times in PEE, I think I owe it a for. And now I can say I voted against it before I voted for it. --Hyperbole 05:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 21:45, Jun. 12, 2008
- sure Le Cejak • <17:17, 13 Jun 2008>
|
Against: 3
|
- Hate to be the naysayer, but articles about articles no longer do it for me. Seems like a great article, but I'm a little tired of HowTo: Do something on Uncyclopedia articles. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:45 May 22
 Against.- I have to agree with SysRq here. With all the whineing about droping users, I don't really think having the first thing you see on the main page is one of these "self Referencial" Jobs is going to help.--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)- Against - sorry, just not seeing it here. Also as SysRq. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 29/05 09:53
Against - I thought it was very funny, but the others are right: articles about a parody encyclopedia do not belong on the front page of a parody encyclopedia. --Hyperbole 02:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Against.- I have to agree with SysRq here. With all the whineing about droping users, I don't really think having the first thing you see on the main page is one of these "self Referencial" Jobs is going to help.--— 
08:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)