Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Write A Funny Band Article

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

HowTo:Write A Funny Band Article (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: HowTo:Write A Funny Band Article	Score: 14 bands who are teh roxxors!
Nominated by:	SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:57, Apr 23
For: 17	Nom & For. As VFH is still a trifle on the anaemic side, I offer up this, which I reviewed a while back and enjoyed. Yeah, it may be a tad in-jokey or self referential or whatever, but it's funny and I think it says much that people need to hear. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:57, Apr 23 For Not bad at all... MrN 20:44, Apr 24 For. It could us another picture, though. Emo, probably. Back in my day, we didn't have Emos. We only had Emus, which were big, flightless birds that wrote poetry and cut themselves. As time went on, they got jobs and, by the 1970's, joined the establishment, becoming ostriches. I kid you not. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC) For featuring this, and then giving it a blurb in HTBFANJS. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:15, Apr 24 For what Led sed. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:02, 26 Apr Agreed because it actually is helpful, but in a perfectly satirical way. Whatever that means. -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS04:26, April 27 2008 For. Very well written. More votes!! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 14:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC) For Though the prose in some areas could use a bit of cleanup -RAHB 05:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC) For This article could really help to make people finally see the...oh, who am I kidding. Still, now people have polished it up, it looks worthy enough. - Commander of the Order 16:27 14 May 2008 (UTC) Funny, and a good public service message for the front page. Only complaint is the Paris Hilton picture should be replaced because she isn't famous so much for her music as for... you know, that stuff she does to be famous... --So So 01:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 03:07, May. 18, 2008 Frie -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC) Dig works for me. --THINKER 04:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC) ForFou-Lu 01:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Flip-flop You know, considering that Under_user has shown that there's precedent for Uncyclopedia-themed articles, and considering that I've cited this article like three times in PEE, I think I owe it a for. And now I can say I voted against it before I voted for it. --Hyperbole 05:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 21:45, Jun. 12, 2008 sure   Le Cejak • <17:17, 13 Jun 2008>
Against: 3	Hate to be the naysayer, but articles about articles no longer do it for me. Seems like a great article, but I'm a little tired of HowTo: Do something on Uncyclopedia articles. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:45 May 22  Against.- I have to agree with SysRq here. With all the whineing about droping users, I don't really think having the first thing you see on the main page is one of these "self Referencial" Jobs is going to help.--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC) Against - sorry, just not seeing it here. Also as SysRq. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 29/05 09:53 Against - I thought it was very funny, but the others are right: articles about a parody encyclopedia do not belong on the front page of a parody encyclopedia. --Hyperbole 02:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Comment: Indeed, we can't be seen to feature an article about editing Uncyclopedia. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:09, Jun 3

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.