Uncyclopedia:VFH/Anal Sex

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Anal sex (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Anal sex	Score: 1.5 pubic hairs... no, 52 pubic hairs! Shit, I have to start all over again.
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:24, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
For: 9.5	Nom and Anal. Brilliant concept, squeaky-clean execution. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:24, July 13, 2010 (UTC) For. -RAHB 07:44, July 13, 2010 (UTC)  Fuck yeah! Obvious joke about voting for anal sex. Love,   For. Rewritten by yours truly. --Andorin Kato 08:12, July 13, 2010 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:32, 13 July 2010  Cor blimey guvna --SadisticWolf 18:19, July 13, 2010 (UTC)  For. I like it, a good twisty surprise. Nice work. Aleister 22:36 13 7  Up the ass —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 01:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Okay. --nachlader 18:34, July 14, 2010 (UTC) For. 79.71.250.72 22:44, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 8	Against. Very instructive but er...where are the laughs supposed to appear in this article? RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:40, July 13, 2010 (UTC)  Against. This is not exactly feature-worthy in my opinion. The running joke is a little bit lame. -- Sf13 14:20 EST 13 July, 2010 Against. Eh, no. ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100714 - 06:07 (UTC) Against. - Ban this filth.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:17, July 14, 2010 (UTC) Seriously? --Andorin Kato 18:31, July 14, 2010 (UTC) Against. The idea is funny, but the execution is a bit labored. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 17:06, July 15, 2010 (UTC) Against. Zim_ulator took the words out of my mouth. Brilliant concept, but after the smile I got from realizing what I was reading, I didn't get very many more. pillow talk 01:13, July 16, 2010 (UTC) Against. Per the two above. --UU - natter 11:48, Jul 16  Against. Again, interesting concept, but you can only run with it for so long. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:12 16 Jul 2010]
Comments	Is this an attempt to turn this site into ED Lite? Will also cause a problem for quite a few users if this becomes a front page feature if they are at work or college. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:54, July 13, 2010 (UTC) The second image features no nudity, so I don't see this becoming a problem. Plus, I don't know what draconian, Christian college you go to... -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:58, July 13, 2010 (UTC) This problem is easily solved by switching the nude pic at the top with the pic that Frog talks about. Recent rants by some users brought a type of consensus that NSFW images should not lead off a feature page. Otherwise, this article is well written and conceived. Aleister 9:46 13 7 Due to overwhelming complaints from the masses, I have adjusted the images. --Andorin Kato 18:11, July 13, 2010 (UTC) It actually doesn't matter what picture leads off a page, as a matter of fact I've heard none of these rants, since an admin can pick whatever image (s)he wants to accompany the article blurb on the front page. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:14, July 13, 2010 (UTC) There was a massive fought-out Forum about this topic awhile back, a knock-down drag-out calling each other names and whinnnnnneeeee template conflict after a couple girls in bathing suits were pictured and it looked like they actually had breasts on themselves. But nobody mentioned that an admin can pick the picture, this would "change everything" about the topic. Thanks for pointing that out. Aleister 22:35 13 7 Gods walk amongst us Aleister.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:19, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH