Forum:UnProvise...namespace

Forums: Index > Village Dump > UnProvise...namespace

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5685 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I have been instructed and/or advised by a certain user, here, that I should start a topic about this... It all came from a discussion from that VFH nom that I linked too. Should UnProvise have/Is it okay to have/Can someone fix up a/an UnProvise namespace?

Or maybe not a namespace...just a space in the mainspace space for UnProvise to fit into, so it doesn't have to languish in userspace for the rest of its spacey days. Maybe if not a namespace, something more like pee review?

It would be quite a bit of work moving it (by "it" I mean all UnProvise related pages) and would create quite a few double-redirects, but I think it shouldn't be too hard work... Anyway, what do you lot think...? - [17:27 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Well i've looked through some of the things people have come up with, and I've also had a look at the pages that you and Orian have come up with and I think the whole idea is fantastic and it'd be great to bring it more into the spotlight as it were. It'd also help other users and readers stumble across some of the content there (Bonner) (Talk) Jun 2, 17:49

Maybe we should have a vote? Votes are fun... Thanks for your support! Your ongoing donations are helping me fight the cause to bring about change you can believe in!- [17:56 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Okay so this is how it's going to go down

• All pages that are currently under userspace will be moved to mainspace. So "User:Orian57/UnProvise" would become "UnProvise:Main Page" and so on
• Any page starting with "User:Orian57/UnProvise/UPR/" will be moved to "UnProvise:". So "User:Orian57/UnProvise/UPR/Demo" would become "UnProvise:Demo"
• Templates that are currently in userspace will be moved to the template namespace under "Template:UnProvise<insert name here>"
• The system will be configured to use the new UnProvise namespace instead of the old userspace

All of this will happen and could be yours... If you truly want it of course.

Sounds good, but it would be better if all UnProvises (i.e. User:Orian57/UnProvise/UPR/) are moved to UnProvise:UPR/<insert name> - just so that all the UnProvises can be kept separately to the UnProvise pages. - [18:21 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

It might be tedious for them to enter 3 letters and then the UnProvise title, also might look wierd on VFH. Puting them like "UnProvise:Demo" would probably be better in my opinion. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 06:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Well maybe all the UnProvise pages (i.e. the main page) should go in Uncyclopedia:UnProvise and then the UnProvises go in UnProvise:Name. Because what if you wanted to make an UnProvise called "about", or something? - [07:08 3 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Vote

Score: +5

• For - I think UnProvise will get more attention in namespace. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 18:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
• For - I think UnProvise will get more convenient in namespace. - [18:21 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise
• For I think UnProvise will get more affordable in namespace. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:32, 2 Jun
• Against. Uncyclopedia:Departure of Fun. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:35, 03 Jun 2008
• Spang. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• For It won't do any harm moving it. And about the VFH, I wasn't voting against because of it being an UnProvise. I didn't find it funny enough. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• Four I count the thingys when i vote. also, I suggested this. fourthly, Spang, this is nothing like the departure of fun, i dont even see where you're compating them. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

  Multiplayer games, maybe? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

  Not really dude. I see were you're going though. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 23:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

  It's basically UnStory, but where each one has a specific theme, and people that can be bothered to edit it. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:26, 04 Jun 2008

• Against I'd like to see more hilarity first. Also, I hate progress. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
• For - FU SPANG (Bonner) (Talk) Jun 3, 06:39
• For per Boner Bonner Erection. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:55 Jun 4

You...erection...don't make me laugh!! - [20:00 4 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

• For having two things which are similar if they are both good enough. MrN 20:31, Jun 4

  The point is that the DoF is for grouping together things exactly like this. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:41, 04 Jun 2008

• Abstain. Like the premise, but I've yet to see much execution. Develop it a bit more and we'll see. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
• Against for now, as per Spang and TKF. ~ 11:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• For Because it's partly mine (at least the idea was) and I think it needs more attention in order to become greater. Have Fun!MuCal. Orian57Talk!Read!PEE!UnProvise!CMC! 09:01 10 June 2008

Results

Well, the vote is at plus 6. shall i fire up my bot? Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 02:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes do so. And make sure that all UnProvise pages currently in namespace gets moved to "UnProvise:<insert name here>". --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 03:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Yup all actual UnProvises should go in UnProvise:name and then all other UnProvise pages, like the homepage, should go in Uncyclopedia:UnProvise/home. - [07:04 9 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

I thought the Main page should just be UnProvise:Main Page, with all the info pages just subpages of that. That seems to be what they do with the other ones. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 10:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I think we should wait a bit further before creating it, there really isn't enough activity there as it is for now. ~ 11:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)