User talk:Finnius
Made from ingredients[edit source]
Review[edit source]
Hi Finnius, and thanks for your review of my re-write of The Jam. I found it quite helpful, actually, and a cut above new users' normal attempts, which usually consist of "funny lol but make it more funnyer". Hnng. Anyway, your review was not like that, hence I extend my thanks. I may make some expansions based on your suggestions if I get time, but for now, I have other plans...
That's an encouraging start to your life here at Uncyc, continue to be so helpful and you'll fit in well around here! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Gandhi review...[edit source]
First off, thanks for the glowing praise.
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Next, you mentioned highlights, and I wanted to let you know it was actually up for highlight right now at VFH. You could cast a vote now to make it happen. Cheerio.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Your Sig[edit source]
I fixed it, it seems you were missing a </span> tag. Also, I'm guessing from one of your deleted comments about vandalism that you don't know how to revert stuff? It's simple enough, just click "last" in the history and you'll see the option to "undo" stuff. It's a bit simper than going to old versions and hitting save. But, I wouldn't worry about it, most people never get their sig vandalized. Just watchlist it just in case. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:05, Oct 18
TADS 3[edit source]
For Grueslayer? No. We're using MediaWiki, the code of kings. —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 18:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- oh you were talking about the one on U, thought you were talking about an outside project--Finnius 18:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Lolz thx XD[edit source]
Thx 4 da pee review, it w@z maaaaad strait! y'all niggas need 2 give ma boiiii finnius da shiiiiiit a' daiiiiii!
Baaaaallliiiinnn'! DarkBlue 19:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Finnius, Review Request?[edit source]
Hey Finn, I've been trolling around recent reviews and I found yours very... enlightened. Would you mind Reviewing one of mine? -- • <-> 13:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Also, instead of just saying "WTF" in the miscellaneous box, might I suggest averaging all your other scores using the Pee Template? {{Pee|5|6|7|8}} makes 6.5. -- • <-> 13:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- The official rules stated that i can put in a 10 and write 'not applicable', OR use the PEE template and put the Average in the Misc. box. I thought that giving people a big 10 was just a nice gesture. Yes, I will review 'Classy' tonight. I saw it on the list last night, but I had already done 2 other reviews and i was tired. Consider it done.
- The official rules state: "And murder is right out!" -7th Commandment ...Thank you! -- • <-> 23:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- actually, i am curious as to why you thought 'I' should do your review? Am I doing ok in that department. I have not gotten any feedback from my other PEE-friends
- Well, like I said at the beginning, yours were more "enlightened". I mean that they were thought out and organized. Most new users are total n00bs about reviewing stuff ("This not funny! Me give 1 out of 10!"). -- • <-> 00:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- actually, i am curious as to why you thought 'I' should do your review? Am I doing ok in that department. I have not gotten any feedback from my other PEE-friends
- The official rules state: "And murder is right out!" -7th Commandment ...Thank you! -- • <-> 23:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
DAMN, NICE REVIEW! I'm gonna start working right away! Thanks again... old bean! -- • <-> 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Finnius, do you have the energy for another review? -- • <-> 00:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Cajek/3 second rule... I'll warn you: it's really weird and stupid thank you again, man! woot -- • <-> 01:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
UnBooks:Science Fair[edit source]
Hey, thanks for the reivew! I've added to the ending, and I'd love to hear what you think. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:04, Nov 3
Hey, you![edit source]
How are you? I haven't seen you in ages. Hmm... Strangely enough my attempt to make you feel uncomfortable by starting this message off on a quirky note has actually made me uncomfortable. Anyhow, thanks for your rather more elaborate review. I thoroughly enjoyed your comments and suggestions. In fact, I am tempted to write another article just so you can review it. Then I'll have more comments and suggestions! Again, I feel a bit uncomfortable now.
P.S. I didn't know it was syllabi...
Atomic Disturbance has awarded this person a RANDOM SUBATOMIC PARTICLE. Mainly because he gets them for free. |
Proofread[edit source]
In case you were wondering, I was the person who put the proofread tag on most of the more recent articles, like ESPN and Oven Gland....I got a bunch more that I'm going to take care of myself....-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for Class[edit source]
Here's a handy user template! -- • <-> 20:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I like that...thanks...is that a 'public' one or is that something your keeping more personal?
- It's for public use, of course. It's a new idea I have: give people user templates instead of stupid ugly big ones. -- • <-> 20:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Urban Dead[edit source]
I was wondering do you play a game called Urban dead? I saw a guy called Finnius in Hildebrand mall not long before he was PKed. If it was you I can set up a RV and get you revived and healed up
Nov 9, 21:40Feel the power of science!![edit source]
Don't fuck with them. |
The Led Balloon has awarded with the gift of sciencey knowledge, because he can already tell that you are smarter than that asshat judge was. | |
Thanks for voting, and remember, |
Thanks for the vote, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:24, Nov 12
Yes! Review time![edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Might I suggest your homecoming review? Unless you're going to do something else right now? • <-> (Dec 5 @ 02:03)
normally i try to do them in order of oldest to newest (unless its a topic that i dont 'get'...but for you i will make the exception, as i have reviewed a couple of your 'works'
Thank you! I'm wondering what you think my "style" is, btw: just insanity? Because I would agree. As far as your writing style goes, you'll get the hang of it if you haven't already. There are plenty of people who have a more fancy way of writing like OEJ for instance. I wanna see your writing up there! • <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:59)
- Well, the articles i have read by you are split into 2 catagories: playful and 'concepts'..but i have only read probably a fraction of your stuff. As for my writing...i think i shall ditch my 'cult leader' and my 'chinese laudromat' (that one was going to be a really drawn out hourly real-life laundromat...until after midnight...when the NEW WORLD CABAL would enter and hold a meeting...discussing the overthrow of Uncyclopedia...and the rest of the world...(insert maniacal laughter here)
I will work on some thoughtful/humorous pieces and let you and Led check em out. Perhaps you will like. Give me a bit of time, as real life requires my attention a lot, plus the fact that i am overly critical about my own work (but that probably goes without saying.)
Those both sound like good article ideas! Make the Chinese Laundromat an unscript and get rid of the uncyclopedia reference for something more mainstream (like the CIA or something). You reviewed another one of my articles! I'm gonna take a look... • <-> (Dec 6 @ 02:01)
Really? That's awesome! Have a thingy you old man:
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
As far as Down Home Drug Commercial goes, it was basically killed from lack of people voting at all, not because people voted against it. Dark humor is awesome if you have a good lead in to it without it being creepy. You should see the longer version of this article (there's a link). It was really cracked. In-jokes are dumb and there are lots of people who share your opinion on the matter. I wish that Mr. Winkler hadn't gotten featured. Oh well, it's rare that that happens. Take a look at Normal and Why?:Hunt Unicorns. I'm whoring to you, btw. You know what I liked best about your review? You actually discussed voice tense, which is pretty important in my articles. I'm gonna see what I can do... • <-> (Dec 6 @ 02:30)
It's true that VFH is not the goal here. The goal is to have fun writing. However, it's nice to get some all-or-nothing feedback (it's pretty exciting). For example, my first VFH article was written when I was just goofing off and having a good time. Turns out that HAVING A GOOD TIME WRITING SOMETHING = FEATURABLE almost always. • <-> (Dec 6 @ 02:34)
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Man! You are doing a great job! Take a look at my page now: User:Cajek/Pee. You're in third place all of a sudden! As far as being funny goes, just give it a shot in your userspace if you're scared it might get deleted or suggest to me a collaboration. See? Our writing styles are not so different, and you WILL get featured eventually! Just write stuff. If you don't write anything, how can you get featured? (BTW, I NOTICED YOUR YELLOW PEE ON YOUR OWN SIG! :) • <-> (Dec 6 @ 03:29)
- finding time away from pee review and proofreading service..well....lol...anyway..i will submit a few tidbits in the coming week for your perusal. Going to IRC now to blow off steam...
Top 10 All-Time[edit | edit source]
User:Cajek/Pee | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | user | # of reviews | # of "in-depth" reviews | % of reviews "in-depth" |
1 | √ ChiefjusticeDS | 197 | 197 | 100% |
2 | √ Black flamingo11 | 134 | 134 | 100% |
3 | √ UU | 132 | 131 | 99% |
4 | √ PuppyOnTheRadio | 108 | 105 | 97% |
5 | √ Lyrithya | 102 | 101 | 99% |
6 | √ Hyperbole | 101 | 100 | 99% |
7 | √ Saberwolf116 | 100 | 94 | 94% |
8 | √ Gerrycheevers | 89 | 82 | 92% |
9 | √ Orian57 | 77 | 75 | 97% |
10 | √ Mnbvcxz | 75 | 73 | 97% |
Top 5 (September - December)[edit | edit source]
User:Cajek/Pee | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | user | # of reviews | # of "in-depth" reviews | % of reviews "in-depth" |
1 | Snippy | 3 | 3 | 100% |
2= | Murder Frog / Zheliel / Simsilikesims | 2 / 2 / 4 | 2 | 100% / 100% / 50% |
4= | Oliphaunte / Kamek98 / Chief | 1 | 1 | 100% |
Top 5 last month (August)[edit | edit source]
User:Cajek/Pee | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | user | # of reviews | # of "in-depth" reviews | % of reviews "in-depth" |
1 | Snippy / GlobalTourniquet / Scofield | 1 | 1 | 100% |
2 | Ferric AlFerrous | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Take THAT no one in particular! • <-> (Dec 6 @ 03:37)
- WAAAAAHH!!! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC) I swear I'll do something during winter break. Swears!
You'd BETTER do something, CAPTAIN! ...You'd better /me glares at Boomer with squinted eyes • <-> (Dec 6 @ 04:06)
You have an admirer![edit source]
Go check out what this young Aristotles wanna-be has to say about you. --Andorin Kato 07:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- so i saw...i was going to humiliate him in bhop, but why bother. He/she probably wont be back. Thanks for the head's up, i probably would have missed that post.
/me stares at Finnius • <-> (Dec 7 / 05:22)
Thanks for the review[edit source]
I would like to thank you for reviewing my page on Metal Sonic. As it is the first article I have doen from scratch (nobody has edited it but me, either), I am glad that at least somebody noticed it and reviewd it (though I have no idea if 28-odd is good or bad), for better or worse. Taking into consideration your ideas, I have tried to add more Terminator stuff into the article, thus completely redoing the 'Battle of the past' and 'the conspiracy' sections. If you can read these parts and see if they are what you had in mind, then that would be okay. I have yet to do the pictures at this time, so don't worry about that. And also, I've put in the proofread tab, as you said. Again, thanks for reviewing it and showing me how an article is supposed to be done. Not bad for a noob, eh?? --Garionepsilon 09:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Appreciation[edit source]
I just wanted to let you know that your work on the Proofreading Service is very much appreciated and that you are directly helping raise the quality of the articles here and that is always a good thing. Too often these things go unnoticed. ^_^ Thanks! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:26, 08 December 2007
How-dee[edit source]
First off, thanks for being so active in proofreading. I see you've done quite a lot of articles. But could you remember to add {{BeenProofread}} to the article's talkpage? It makes it neater and I think it's what's generally accepted to do. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:52 Dec 09, 2007
- oops. I didn't see that in the main page, but from now on, YES, I will add the template to the talkpage as well.
Lol Creme[edit source]
Thanks for the speedy review of my new article. I was really tapped for ideas. It might take me a bit to rewrite it, but keep your eye on it. I'll put it back up for review when I'm satisfied, maybe you can check it out again.
EDIT
Article edited and up for review again! :D
Hea,[edit source]
RE your comments on pee-review in the dump... I suggest you read the talk page of the new guide. Have you read the guide? MrN 03:21, Dec 9
so i see..i just finished the read..ya ill revert
Injun Review[edit source]
Hey, thanks for the review. I've changed up the article abit seince then, but if you've got some suggestions i'd like to hear them. thanks again.
Sig Models[edit source]
Hey hey there, sir! I see that you like that new sig model I got you! Maybe you'd like to try a few more just for shits and giggles! What? Yes I cuss, it's part of the service here at Cajek's Model Sigs.
- FINNIUS
For the really blunt ones.
- finnius
For those who are secure in their manhood.
Okay okay, yeah these are terrible, but I think that you look good in 'em. • <-> (Dec 10 / 02:15)
Thank You ATU[edit source]
Thank you for the good TYATU pee review.
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Plus, you were right about the problems in the Mythcapades/Uncyclopedia Island time. That was when Han quit. With a shark jump. The Mythcapades shark jump, in fact. It therefore effected UI badly.
Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- Like I said, I never went into the history or anything...jesus if i had started analyzing THAT, i would have never finished it. But, yes, i could see a distinct break from form.
Carol of the Bells[edit source]
Hark! how the bells
Sweet silver bells
All seem to say,
"Throw cares away."
Christmas is here
Bringing good cheer
To young and old
Meek and the bold
Ding, dong, ding, dong
That is their song
With joyful ring
All caroling
One seems to hear
Words of good cheer
From ev'rywhere
Filling the air
Oh how they pound,
Raising the sound,
O'er hill and dale,
Telling their tale,
Gaily they ring
While people sing
Songs of good cheer
Christmas is here
Merry, merry, merry, merry Christmas
Merry, merry, merry, merry Christmas
On, on they send
On without end
Their joyful tone
To ev'ry home
Ding, dong, ding, dong.
\o/ 17:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
pees[edit source]
thanks for your pee-watching-over-mentoring type thing! i hope to continue to earn your respect and approval with quality, often uncontrolled peeing. -- 09:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Over-mentoring? You didn't really need any...Respect/approval? Bahh, i'm just finnius...Uncontrolled? Anarchy!
thanks![edit source]
As promised, you are presented with one (1) package of Kevin Bacon's Bacon Strip BandagesTM for your thorough Pee Review of that article that had nothing to do with Kevin Bacon. Please note that Bacon Strip Bandages are not safe for either contact with skin or internal consumption. |
great review fin, thanks a lot. in short, i was hoping for the good stuff you said, and aware of / dreading the bad stuff. i wrote the whole thing with minimum knowledge of the whole real history, and a cursory look at the wikipedia hans blix page. don't be hesitant to criticize, and don't feel the need to apoligize in any review, because you're one of the best in the 'biz, and what you say seems to stick. i'll go with your suggested changes, pull some images from somewhere, and see how it does wih a second opinion. i'm not really expecting a vfh on this one, but ya never know, right? -- 06:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
you get dis[edit source]
Bloody marvelous! Happiness abound in readings of you. Laughing Chairman Mao giving you award from OpenFaceSurgery for special contribute of funny to Uncyclopedia!!
this is for that funny story —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 05:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Have a not-shitty Christmas![edit source]
Heya, The Led Balloon here, wishing you merry Christmas, or any other holiday you feel like celebrating. Just remember what it's all really about: NO WORK, NO SCHOOL, FREE STUFF!!! | |
Here's to hoping your school(or work) calendar for December doesn't look too much like this... |
Merry Christmas, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:26, Dec 17
Bloody Pagans[edit source]
Premier Tom Mayfair has been a naughty boy this year, but he still deserves a kiss from under the mistletoe. His external organ is fair game. |
Merry Xmas![edit source]
Bonner would like to wish you
a Merry Christgame |
Merry Christmas soon![edit source]
Uncyclopedian wishes you have a merry Christmas and a happy New Year's! |
Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
Happy Something or other...[edit source]
Happy Happy Spam Day!
|
holiday greetings[edit source]
Gerrycheevers wishes you a Happy Solstice! Enjoy the pagan festival of the Northernmost Sunrise! As a special holiday treat, Gerry also is willing to waive the usual offering of blood required in return for this friendly greeting. |
Re. Proofreading Service[edit source]
I replied on my talk page to your message-- 20:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- That was actually Contestant who did thay. Also, while I'm here, happy XMas
AE has awarded you a beer in which you help build your own Christmasbeerbottletree (shown right) | |
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! |
Hey![edit source]
Where are you, finnius? We need your bladder! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:20, Feb 10
- There is defiantly something fishy going on... Maybe Fin has been poached by another wiki? MrN 23:28, Feb 10
TYATU[edit source]
Hey, Finnius, you wanted to work on season 3 of TYATU, right? I just finished Season 2. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- YES! I suppose we can meet at the discussion page or in IRC/Yahoo messenger/MSmessenger...whatever tickles your fancy
Hey, you![edit source]
Where'd you go? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:34 May 04, 2008
- I concur! • <May 04, 2008 [23:14]>
- Yeah! - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 23:19, May 4
- Oh, i've been very busy learning Maya and Renderman, and working on various alpha/beta's. One that you might be interested in is a new shell for Windows at http://www.cairoshell.com/ Tell 'em Finnius sent ya! I could be back in a few weeks, depending on how caught up I get on things...
- Yeah! - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 23:19, May 4
FINNIUUUUSSSS[edit source]
WHERE ARE YOU?? WE LOVE YOU!! COME BACK TO US!!! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Holy god it's finius[edit source]
FINNIUS! FIN! OVER HERE! FIN! LOOK! LOOK AT ME! OVER HERE! Anyway, yeah, you were dethroned a while back. You were gone longer than I was! • <1:20 Jun 02, 2009>
- hmmm...well, i'm back (at least i'm still on ONE of the lists. I have to make amends)...time for revenge! Bwaahahha hah!...good to see you Cajek !
hi fin! good to see you! now get to work, you lazy fish! 12:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Can you believe I had to go thru the editing rules, because I had forgotten how to do some little 'tricks'...lol. It's unbelievable to me that simple formatting rules had become lost in my foggy memory. Damn, I must be getting old.
WTF![edit source]
Oh crap, I washed up back on the shores of Uncyclopedia! (back-washed?)...god help me! :D You're back! Hi! You don't know me, and I don't know you, but YOU'RE BACK! ~ Thu, May 17 '12 18:23 (UTC)
Yo dog[edit source]
I heard you were a Grammar Nazi. Consider me your Fuhrer, or better, "sidekick". HEIL SPELLCHECK!
11:59, May 17, 2012 (UTC)- Ahh you kids today! Think you can just sneak onto my property and starting spraypainting things on my wall?? What's this sense of entitlement you all seem to possess? Im a gonna call the Gestapo on you....see if I don't.