User talk:Cassie/archive8

Two maintence things

1. Please for the love of god clear out Uncyclopedia:DYK submissions. It needs some maintence.
2. Roza's UN:OFFICE restriction was installed by our favorite Aimsplode. Someone else needs to take charge of it, maybe leaving a comment saying the installer was permabanned themselves! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

I just took care of Roza's office restriction: as for DYK subm., I'll huff or approve 'em all over the course of today and tomorrow. I don't want it to jam up too much after all!  Cassandra  (talk) 10:24am  February 15, 2021

Proxy huff time

1. 45.57.226.0/23(3 years per WP)

That has been recently used for proxy spam, but there are some other IPs needing attention. For instace, 186.96.209.0/24 was recently used for abuse both on Uncyclopedia and Wikipedia, so a 3 month rangeblock is required. (In December). 157.97.120.0/23 was also used for abuse on December 30, and is a proxy needing a 3 year block.

Also, please revert this semi-racist edit, and warn the IP, with uw-vandalism1 or something along those lines. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

And this, please also warn with uw-vandalism1. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Inserted a manual warning, and huffed all these respective IP ranges.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:22am  February 15, 2021

Question

I want to do the enwiki equivalent of a good article review with I-95 before sending it off to VFH. While technically not VFH, since its in the area I can edit and pings aren't working, can a one time exception allow me to directly notify them on their TP? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I will grant you this one time exemption, as long as you notify me on my talk page within fifteen (15) minutes of adding the message on the aforementioned talk page; like this, I can quickly swoop in to say that it's an authorized-despite-sanctions edit.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:17am  February 15, 2021

Hipponias notified. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Shabidoo notified. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Finally, Jabberwock notfied. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Perfect. I'll mention in their talk pages that this is authorized.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:43pm  February 15, 2021

Huff request

File:Anan with Mahi.jpg. Borderline vanity/spam issues. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Probable socking

I think MAI and Biography are related, giving the image above which I requested to be huffed, the creating of the userpage and the welcome.  It looks like a duck to me. This is a serious SPI! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll perform a CU now, granted how this seems like a possible sockpuppetry case...  Cassandra  (talk) 10:28am  February 15, 2021

Confirmed to be same IP via CheckUser. Both additionally seem to be using the same Google Chrome browser version, adding to my suspicions even more. I'll insert the sockpuppet notice.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:32am  February 15, 2021

Are they being blocked or no? I think just two days is enough, this is really minor.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm not bothering with a block, considering that they are not using the sockpuppets in a malicious manner. However, I'm keeping an eye out, and will enact harsher punishments if required (including indef blocks for ban evasion).  Cassandra  (talk) 01:16pm  February 15, 2021

I think at least some sort of block is needed to show in the block log, but maybe only for like 15 seconds, ust so it says in the block log for future reference.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

DJ S Universe Q sockpuppet

Hi, I believe that Md Daniel Faz is a newly created sockpuppet of DJ S Universe Q, as DJ signed as 'Md Daniel Faz' on his talk page. DJ has also replaced the contents of his talk page with a single link to his fandom, blanking out all his warnings. I think his talk page access should be revoked and both accounts permabanned. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  13:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

CU Confirmed. Blocked sockpuppets with TPA revoked, blocked sockmaster with TPA revoked, inserted sock notices.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:09pm  February 15, 2021

I don't know if this should be mentioned in the block log, but he engaged in crosswiki abuse at Wikipedia. See [1] [2] [3]--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I also don't know if he should be at UN:OFFICE as this is pretty severe. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Judging by how desperate he was to remain on Wikipedia and Uncyc, we (or some poor administrator at Rationalwiki or Fandom) might be in for an onslaught of socks very soon. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  13:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Did someone call me? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I do hope he goes to Conservapedia though. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  13:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Let's hope for Conservapedia and FANDOM to get ruined by 'em. Especially Conservapedia, as they've just become Trump shills.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:46pm  February 15, 2021

This is a rare time Wikipedia isn't an enemy, but a friend! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Please block 27.125.240.0/20

Known to be used by a spammer, I see no need in it being left open. Leavea note saying if you aren't the user to come on IRC, but not to use talk oage as it could be Dj S. Thanks --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll use the standard "open proxy" block for 6 months here.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:19pm  February 15, 2021

Can you import the following Wikipedia templates

1. Template:Atop
2. Template:Abot

I feel it will be much easier to close discussions that way. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

And... done.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:01pm  February 15, 2021

There needs to be a fix. Look at Talk:Interstate 95. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia does not support sanitized CSS, that's why. Fixed.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:10pm  February 15, 2021

You need to create

Category: Users engaged in cross-wiki abuse. Leaving redlink on Q's userpage. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done by Cassie. Are you sure Q doesn't need an UN:OFFICE listing? It would be very similar to Arthur. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Looking at it, not for now. I'll probably insert one if a new sockpuppet pops up though. Hopefully this is the end to the saga.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:20pm  February 15, 2021

Thats reasonable. Will alert if another sock is suspected. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Perfect. May all ban-evasion socks disappear. And if it gets really bad (10+ socks), I'll start using the abuse filter too.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:29pm  February 15, 2021

See section above for Biography sock. It's important. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Got it!  Cassandra  (talk) 06:30pm  February 15, 2021

I think VFD and VFH need to be broadcasted

First of all, please archive Xi Jingping. Consensus reached, and its clogging up the page. Still, there are too many nominations and is moving slowly

Even VFH is having slow noms like Hurricane Rita and Mississippi so that could require some broadcasting. Also, Talk: Beak Lions and Talk:Valvoline need the plaque saying it was on VFD and survived.

Thanks. And remember to broadcast on Discord and IRC! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I think if this continues, since I keep broadcasting for Discord/IRC, I'll just change the site header for registered users to one promoting VFH. As for VFD, might implement that too if required.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:10pm  February 15, 2021

Yeah I think we should do a VFH header as it got more traction when we did. I think VFD did too. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll try designing a quick message box for that in some time to accomplish that purpose. Uncyclopedia might be active, but so few people monitor VFH that it is causing the site to crater.  Cassandra  (talk) 06:34pm  February 15, 2021

That would help . maybe vfd too. And VFp.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Question

Am I allowed to edit New Jersey Turnpike. It's not an interstate article, but parts of it are interstates, and I think there is some good work I can pump into it. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

It kind of counts, so yeah. I might extend "Interstates" to "all major four-plus-lane American highways".  Cassandra  (talk) 06:33pm  February 15, 2021

Request

Because Arthur was banned for xwiki abuse, can the cwa link be added to his userpage to show this? The link to the enwiki SPI is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/A_Den_Jentyl_Ettien_Avel_Dysklyver/Archive. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Inserting now. Thanks for providing the url!  Cassandra  (talk) 06:35pm  February 15, 2021

Captain MarcusL needs a formal warning

Warned, Level 3 by JJPMaster --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Either uw-create3 or uw-create4. They keep creating pointless pages. It is unsustainable. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I did that about a half hour before your posting-ness of this comment. See it here. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 17:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I swear WIP needs work

Just look at the category and the entries stretching back to 1/4! --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrative irresponsibility at its finest. I'll perform a wide-ranging huff sometime tonight.  Cassandra  (talk) 06:38pm  February 15, 2021

Open, unblocked proxies need to be blocked

1. 193.27.10.0/24(3 years per WP)
2. 196.242.10.0/23(3 years per WP)

Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

And..... done.  Cassandra  (talk) 06:44pm  February 15, 2021

Request

1. Please archive Xi Jingping off VFD. It was moved to userspace.No need for it to be on and it clutters
2. Please put Interstate 90 into VFD. It has so many issues, and it just can't be resolved so easily. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Initiating now.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:33pm  February 15, 2021

Proxy needing block

185.122.168.0/22 for 37 months per WP. Used by NordVPN. Also used for xwiki spam. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for 5 years.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:31pm  February 15, 2021

Please remove vandalism on Sleep

[4]. Please also warn 73.235.91.43 with uw-vandalism2, as they were warned before, with a template, so a templated warning is fair. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Initiating RedWarn now.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:23pm  February 15, 2021

Not sure about [5], may need reverting and if it does, a level 2 will be needed. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll allow it, since it isn't really disruptive per se.  Cassandra  (talk) 09:54am  February 16, 2021

This discussion is getting out of hand. If you really see the need to continue this further, you may do so on my talk page. However, I think the consensus is that it wasn't vandalism, but wasn't great, and should have been removed. If Cassie really feels the need to reopen he can. This is gonna go nowhere. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

That first edit on Sleep wasn't vandalism either. It might not have been the funniest contribution, but that wasn't vandalism. MrX blow me 14:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

It sort of was. It was certaintly disruptive editing, even if in good faith, --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

No, Gale5050, it really wasn't disruptive, and it was actually kinda funny. I don't have a strong opinion about whether or not to leave it in the article, but it was not disruptive. MrX blow me 16:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't know if I have a different sense of humour, but for me, it deprived humor from the article. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Like I said, it might not have been the funniest contribution, but that doesn't make it vandalism. MrX blow me 16:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll agree that it wasn't vandalism, but I stand my ground that it is disruptive, even if in good faith. For many people, it deprives humour. That is the whole reason I voted against some VFHs. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

But that is not disruptive editing. Please listen. MrX blow me 16:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Depriving humour from an article is disruptive(any negative change to an Uncyclopedia article), but I w0n't persue further. Thats why on WP, the default block(wp:template:uw-block), links to disruptive editing. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

That didn't universally deprive humor, some people think it added to the humor. Disruptive editing is very different from that. Please stop citing Wikipedia policies here (again), and please start listening when other people are trying to help you (again). This kind of behavior is what lead to your sanctions, and if you continue this behavior, you will not find many people supporting your sanctions to be lifted. MrX blow me 17:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I am not trying to cite WP policies, I was thwarted into doing so. Any negative change to an Uncyclopedia article, while in good faith or as vandalism, is disruptive. Any time a user warning template is used, it is some form of disruptive editing. (If you equip RW, you will see that.) Depriving humor takes article quality away, therefore making it a negative change, therefore making it unconstructive/disruptive in some way, shape, or form. Not many people would find it funnier, and for me, it was so corny it made me click away from the article. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

That wasn't an unambiguous "negative change" to the article. The editor thought that it was a funny contribution, and no, it did not meet our definition of disruptive editing. You were "thwarted into doing so"?? This is at least the third time you have tried to imply that others are "forcing" you to do things here. You really need to stop this. I guess you won't listen to me. Hopefully you'll listen to Cassie, or anyone else for that matter. MrX blow me 17:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your right, some would find it funny. Generally I try to think, "would 50% of people in English speaking countries find it funny?" In this case, I estimate ~35%. I am listening to you, just standing my ground.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale that was not vandalism. It was just an edit that could have been a LOT better. Your definition of vandalism is extremely flawed and you should listen to other users. Vandalism is pointlessly putting obscene or vulgar shit on an article to provoke or its pointlessly putting random text on an article to be annoying. Making an edit that could have been better is NOT vandalism...it is simply making an edit that could have been better. If we treat not funny edits as vandalism as they do on the spoon then we would have as few users as they do (i.e. don't bit the noob/IP/inexperienced user). If stand your ground and take that attitude towards edits I doubt you will be given permission to revert vandalism any time soon. ShabiDOO 17:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

It was already acknowleged it was not vandalism. Also for the love of god please colon your posts correctly. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lots of pages needing ICU

Maybe Seven Nation Armi, definitely the rest.

1. Doctwa whoo
2. Novi russia
3. Novia russia.

The last two may even be QVFD quality. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Huffed all of the above.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:19pm  February 16, 2021

Please delete

Category:10 February 2020. Empty category. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Huffed.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:19pm  February 16, 2021

Proxies to huff

1. 192.198.96.0/19(27 months per WP)
2. 83.171.254.0/23(1 year per WP)

Thanks --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

And while I'm here CarmellaMcGarvie, huffed by the abuse filter, is continuing to spam/trigger autoblocks. Please conduct a checkuser and block the IPs as I have a feeling multiple spambots are on that IP. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Initiating CU and block now.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:19pm  February 16, 2021

That last user just exposed at least 10 open proxies. Oh well.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:24pm  February 16, 2021

I'm gonna check to see if any IPs you blocked are open proxies. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Alrighty. Thanks for helping out!  Cassandra  (talk) 03:28pm  February 16, 2021

The first IP, 47.224.64.100 is a proxy, but it was only blocked on WP for 60 days. Doing this one by one in case I have to get off Uncyclopedia.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Same for 71.74.229.33 --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

And 75.71.123.25 --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

47.233.85.115 is blocked on WP for a year as an open proxy. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

So is 73.151.217.135.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

And 98.36.90.101.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

24.153.39.221 is blocked 6 months on WP as an open proxy. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

And 71.10.88.188. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC) 47.28.233.170 is for 3 years. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm absolutely unsurprised by all of this. ALl the IPs have been banned for 5 years, which should be beyond enough for most purposes. No further action is needed for now, but if you discover that these IPs form part of a spambot range, please let me know so I can huff the whole range too!  Cassandra  (talk) 07:50pm  February 16, 2021

203.106.119.10, blocked for 3 months as a spambot, was also the IP of a spammer in May 2013. Clearly it is still being used for spam, therefore I propose a block of ten years. I'd say allow account creation, if any spambots are on the range, we can huff 'em up later.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Huff huff,  Done.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:03pm  February 16, 2021

User:SMB99thx

I can't welcome them, please do the honors and also introduce them to the tropical cyclone articles. Also, it might be worth telling him, that Hurricane Rita is at VFH. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I just gave them a generic welcome message. If they do reply, I'll introduce them to the hurricane articles and VFH as the first step in our Noob Welcoming Programme(TM).  Cassandra  (talk) 08:02pm  February 16, 2021

My new template

Hey, wanna try out my new Timezone template? After a while of fixing everything (the time module was being weird), I've finally made it work. It displays your timezone as well as the current time there, so people will know when to find you and when you are asleep (or binge-watching Youtube at 1am). ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  19:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Meh, it's pretty obvious I'm in EST. I had said it multiple times. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Putting it in won't hurt! I'll mention that I use UTC, despite me living in EST. My "awake time" is 09:00 thru 23:59 UTC, sometimes all the way through 02:00 UTC.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:04pm  February 16, 2021

Hmm. That's confusing. I believe your awake time would go to 03:00, as I sometimes see you past 02:00? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, it's confusing because, on one side in UTC, its 9am to 2am, in EST, 4am to 9pm is still confusing. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

It's called a "wonky sleep schedule". And usually I prefer not really receiving messages past 2am EST, since I usually try to head to sleep by then; I often do stay up until 3am. As for my "wake-up time", it sometimes is 10am UTC... oh well. Maybe I should just use Newfoundland time: that'll make my sleep schedule 5:30am to 10:30pm.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:27pm  February 16, 2021

Yeah, that's a smart idea, Cape Verde time may also work (8am-1am). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I think that you should either use Cape Verde time (UTC-1 year round), or Newfounland time (UTC-3:30, but UTC-2:30 during DST). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Withdraw request

Please withdraw Uncyclopedia:VFH/Mississippi. Stale for nearly a month, author doesn't care. Score of +1.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, Uncyclopedia:VFP/Trump In Peach.png should be featured, +7 unanomous vote. please leave a comment saying it was featured.

--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Taking care of 'em now.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:32pm  February 17, 2021

Um

I made a few area code redirects. I don't think they violate my sanctions, cause area codes are loosely related to geography. But, I will refer to your descretion --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

That's fine. It counts.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:39pm  February 17, 2021

“Pheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww”

~ Gale5050

SMB99thx

They replied, see [6] and [7]. Now time to get them involved with the Uncyc community. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Great! I'll inform 'em in a moment.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:40pm  February 17, 2021

As he steps away from his computer. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

slaps self How fucking irresponsible of this admin.  Cassandra  (talk) 06:04pm  February 17, 2021

Walks away from the computer again. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

And.... almost seven hours after initially stating that they'll do shit, they finally did.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:01pm  February 17, 2021

You gave them the wrong PR link. It's actually UN:PEE --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Whoopsies, how irresponsible on my end. Fixed.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:20pm  February 17, 2021

Please huff these proxies

1. 50.7.0.0/16(3 years per WP. Be aware, it does geolocate to Singapore.)
2. 104.160.16.0/22(3 years per WP)

Also, please block the larger 104.160.0.0/19 for 2 years, per [8].--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, 186.96.209.0/24 needs to be blocked 3 months. Crosswiki abuse both on WP and Uncyclopedia(see Cat the Colourful's userpage history. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Also found 206.41.160.0/19, could use a 3 year block. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

....All huffed.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:04pm  February 17, 2021

You huffed 206.41.160.0/19 for.....99 years???? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Finger slipped. This is embarassing...  Cassandra  (talk) 10:18pm  February 17, 2021

User:Kinkykookykat

Not revdel'ed. Close stale. --Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 02:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Yeah, you'll need to revdel a a lot of their user page due to PII issues. I'll inform them on their talk page. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  19:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm actually not sure anything needs to be revdeled unless they ask for it. But mentioning it on their talk page is okay. MrX blow me 19:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Child protection policy/draft1 explicitly states, "Additionally, users between the ages of thirteen (13) and seventeen (17) are officially discouraged from revealing their age on Uncyclopedia. These users will also have their age or any mentions thereof revision deleted, but this will be reversed if the user in question objects (albeit after they are presented with the Child Protection Policy).". If they object it can be reversed, but I think it should be RevDel'ed, and would encourage one to take place.

However, Hipponias, please do not make public requests, as it further exposes the situation until a RevDel can be done. Instead, you should email him directly. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050, did you read the user page? Did you see what age they state they are? MrX blow me 20:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, it's not a him. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  20:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I think Gale5050 meant email Cassie directly. MrX blow me 20:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah yes, that makes more sense. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  20:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Agreed. Usually for P.I.I. purposes, public disclosure often works against the public interest. Currently, the admins are grappling with another instance of User:Alden Loveshade, known-and-exposed pedophile; as such, the importance of forbidding PII, especially age, is especially important. And yeah, revdel time.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:06pm  February 17, 2021

Since that user discloses their age is 18, but does mention an exact birthday in addition to a grade level, for the sake of erring on the side of caution I'll ask them.  Cassandra  (talk) 10:09pm  February 17, 2021

As an idiot, I thought they were 17. As an idiot, I thought it was still 2020. Maybe I should read up on UnNews:2020 refuses to concede, vows to continue one more year. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I've finished authenticating the user and can confirm that they are a legitimate user, and not some cranky Alden sockpuppet; no guarantees though. Authentication was performed via external means (username comparison), since evidence solely from the Wikiverse was insufficient. I'll go welcome the aforementioned user, and tell them about the risks of age disclosure.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:22am  February 18, 2021

Why would it be Alden?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please ICU

1. Nerd bullying
2. Special brownies
3. Ersu
4. Nuosu
5. Jurchen
6. Tangut
7. Peter Cussing(although a {{construction}} may be more appropriate, or a {{expand}}.)
8. Obama triangles

Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll take care of all of these as soon as I'm done with the aforementioned situation (see below).  Cassandra  (talk) 01:07am  February 18, 2021

Captain MarcusL removed an ICU tag on Obama triangles, so a formal warning and/or temp block is necessary. In addition, I think they are a sockpuppet of U u u wa wa, who also created these types of pages, so I think a CU is necessary. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Donald Trumpets also needs ICU. Also, I know you're online; please respond; you edited at 2:24am. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Warned, ICU reinstated, ICU-ing the donald trump page. Sorry for the late reply.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:34am  February 18, 2021

Please ICU UnNews:Toddler learns new word from book FACSINATING DISCORVERYE.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

And Bidomes. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Why my pages? --The ills might a bartakesome who sled beary losice knot or'd ent grubles ay, beam. (a proverb) Get 𪟧ed, fools! 19:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC) User:Pugsleyfan69420

Your article is too short for Uncyclopedia, User:Pugsleyfan69420. You need to work on it, by adding more categories and expanding it. ICU is for new pages, like yours, that have potential but need work. Not to fear, as long as you expand it over the next week, you can make it into a full UnNews article! You also need to add the date to make it appear in the right thing on the categories-Category:18 February 2021 in this case. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale, try to think about the language that you use (i.e. not biting the noobs). While your comment is friendly it can still be more encouraging. Instead of "too short" try "could be longer" as this is a comment rather than a judgement. And instead of "you need to work on it" try "it could be improved with a little more work". This is a suggestion instead of an order. Instead of "you also need to add the date" try "Don't forget to add the date" or even better "Articles benefit from adding the date". Pugsleyfan is just starting to write here and it would be great if they join our community and contribute however they like. I hope they do. ShabiDOO 20:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Few things. First of all, Shabidoo, for the love of Christ please fix your formatting. It's actually getting annoying. Second of all, I understand what you mean by it should be more encouraging, but I'd say saying "This is because the article is not currently funny and needs improvement." is worse then anything I said. It passes UN:BITE. Also, I will note that they have made edits on October 27, and were welcome on October 28, so they aren't as "nooby" as others. Still, I will try for friendlier comments in the future. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

One thing

I think we need to spread the timezone thing Hippo created to as many people as possible. For example, Cat the Colourful, Shabidoo, and whytheonlyone, should have the template equipped, possibly with even more. I can't spread the word due to my sanctions; do you mind? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll inform 'em via Discord as soon as I manage to authenticate User:Kinkykookykat. (I've gathered up some dirt on Wikipedia already.)  Cassandra  (talk) 01:04am  February 18, 2021

Cassie, I believe for Cat it is 4:52am and for Shabidoo 3:52am. As such I would recommend either tp, email, or at the very least waiting until the morningtime for them. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I've finished authenticating the user and can confirm that they are a legitimate user, and not some cranky Alden sockpuppet; no guarantees though. I'll proceed to let everyone know about the timezone template now.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:20am  February 18, 2021

Why would they be an Alden sock? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

According to CandidToaster, and because the aforementioned user registered at the "worst time possible" (an admin investigation into Alden has been reopened less than 24 hours ago). Therefore, it's either a pretty large coincidence or some sort of elaborate attempt to siphon users to illegal websites.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:33am  February 18, 2021

P.S. I archived the talkpage for all entries prior to today.  Cassandra  (talk) 02:34am  February 18, 2021

Cat also rejected it. He says his sleep schedule is too odd. Weird. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Seven Nation Armi

Hello Cassie.

Can I ask why did you put this infobox at the article Seven Nation Armi? First of all, the article is not finnished yet, and I think it is uncool to delete it until he will be finnished. Second of all, who gave you the authority to decide which article is funny and which article is not. Not every article has to be satirical or topical to be funny. Third of all, I think that nonsense could be very funny, and my article is funny enough to stay in the web.

Wating to your response.

Regards, מה שתגיד (talk) 11:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, I'm an administrator here. Most other non-administrator users here also have the authority to do so. The reason why I marked it as unfunny is because it lacks original content; it currently builds too heavily on conspiracy theories and not enough original satire. The reason why Uncyclopedia often deletes unfinished articles is because it would otherwise clutter up the site; additionally, unlike our parody Wikipedia, it is impossible to compress humor (unlike information) in a stub.

If you need advice on article-writing, please do not hesitate to ask. There are plenty of users out here whom wish to help. Once you are done with your article, feel free to also nominate it on UN:PEE to have another user "review" your article for you.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:06pm  February 18, 2021

I was the one requesting it be in ICU, FWIW. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 12:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't know that you are an administrator. Anyway, I'm not saying that the article is a masterpeace, but I still think it shouldn't be deleted. Conspiracy theories are sometimes more topical then a lot of real news. Like, I think "Bill Gates is spreading the Covid-19 viruses with his 5G tecnology" is (unfortunately) one of the most popular conspiracy theories in the last 6-12 monthes. And regardless, I have puted a lot of effort into the "Bill Gates and his six frogs" picture, which would be a Too bad to delete Template:Laugh. מה שתגיד (talk) 12:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. Anyways, I understand, and Uncyclopedia has its fair share of articles written by new users. I'll replace ICU with "Construction" since you seem quite dedicated on working on it - hopefully that seems "less aggressive".

Also, for the picture... it's quite good, in fact. You may want to try nominating it in VFP; if it's good enough it could become a "featured image" and appear on the front page of the website!  Cassandra  (talk) 12:43pm  February 18, 2021

The user shold probably have a welcome, also to make the redlink in there sig blue. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you both, I really appreciate your support and understanding! It means a lot for me. מה שתגיד (talk) 13:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Please delete For those without comedic tastes the so called experts at wikipedia have an article about

Pretty much spam. Owner should get a uw-spam2 warning. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 12:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll move it to the author's userspace and give them one of my ambox warnings.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:28pm  February 18, 2021

Request

Please add {{oldvfd| date = 10/23/2020| result = Keep| page = Beak Lions}} to Talk:Beak Lions and {{oldvfd| date = 12/23/2020 | result = Keep | page = Valvoline }} to Talk:Valvoline so people know it survived VFD. It's important and I provided a direct copy paste so please do it. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done and copied verbatim.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:16pm  February 18, 2021

Proxies to huff

1. 196.242.200.0/24(3 years per Wikipedia)
2. 146.148.177.176(already blocked, but please extend to 6 months).

Thanks --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

And please CU SoniaC63790 and block the IPs as they are a spambot trying to spam again. And before blocking, please go to Wikipedia and check if they are open proxies, to block a larger range at once. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done,  Done and  Done.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:21pm  February 18, 2021

 No open proxy found. We'll catch them next time.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:26pm  February 18, 2021

181.177.112.51 needs to have the block extended to six months. Its an open proxy. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Also found 196.16.0.0/16. Three years, please. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

And done.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:21am  February 19, 2021

Category:Feature nomination

Many failed nominations need this tag removed. They include

1. File:Toyz.jpg
2. UnNews talk:McAvoy takes blame for X-Men reviews
3. Stabby stab stab stab
4. File:Wizard of moz.jpg
5. Bullshit
6. Pirates of the Caribbean (film series)
7. Ecce Mono
8. Resume

Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Taking care of these later. Invoking treadmill excuse for now.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:27pm  February 18, 2021

As he rides his tredmill for <ahem> nearly ten hours. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I hope he replies by tomorrow, as another hour passes. There is a lot for him to check out. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Back. Heh. That was a long ride.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:21am  February 19, 2021

Please block 183.199.125.0/25

No open proxies, but two spambots on such a tight range is not good. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Initiating now.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:24pm  February 18, 2021

 Done by Cassie for 8 months, set to expire on October 18, 2021. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Request

Can I participate in the Top 10 articles of 2020 logo? MrX even encouraged me. This is the one barrier. Please let me cross. Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Indeed I did. FWIW, fine by me! MrX blow me 15:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Yep, most definitely! Sorry for the super slow reply.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:19am  February 19, 2021

New forum

I'm assuming you've already seen this, but just in case, please join us here: Forum:Top 10 Articles of 2020 Logo. If you're wondering why several hours passed before I sent you a message, it's because I hate your guts I'm an idiot I'm a tool I'm a douche ok fine I fell asleep. Cheers. MrX blow me 15:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

It's does not makes sense, MrX made an edit at 09:03(which is 1:03am local time), and then 13:45(5:45 am local time). The dots don't add up. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

He could've slept for that long exactly. ---WohMi, the best damn duelist on this website (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Personally I am one who goes to bed and sometimes edit Uncyclopedia within ten minutes but it takes me a while for me to fall asleep(60-90 minutes). Also waking up I can get on Uncyclopedia immediately. I woke up at 7:05 am and edited at 7:08. However, I am unique. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Yeah I'm on a fairly normal schedule due to having a job and family, but to be honest, my body's "bioclock" does not work like it does for most people. I'll normally be active during "normal" hours for PST, but there are no guarantees. MrX blow me 17:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, this can be evidenced by your frequent edits at 7am. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

MrX, were you affected by the power outage in the Portland-Vancouver area? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Thankfully no I was not. I'm in SoCal. We had some issues with fires a few months ago, they got close to us and the sky was red and ashy, but luckily we didn't have to evacuate or anything. MrX blow me 18:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh. I heard that the snow in Portland and its metro area is the equivalent of the Isaias power outages on Long Island, basically, 1/3 of the place loses power. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure thing, MrX! I'll join in after a good few hours' worth of sleep.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:25am  February 19, 2021

What Uncyclopedia article should I make

In the mainland 48, every state has a wettest TC. Texas's Hurricane Harvey already has an article(already nominated at a VFH its likely gonna fail), but I want to know which ones deserve an article. The following states have these storms have there records for post-1939.

1. Kathleen 1976(California, Montana, Oregon)
2. Nora 1997(Arizona)
3. Olivia 1982(Idaho, Utah)
4. Doreen 1977(Nevada)
5. Ignacio 1997(Washington)
6. Lester 1992(Colorado, North Dakota)
7. Javier 2004(Wyoming, South Dakota)
8. Cristobal 2020(Minnesota)(probably should be kept in 2020 Atlantic hurricane season
9. Unnumbered tropical depression of 1954(New Mexico)
10. Norma 1981(Oklahoma)
11. Frances 1998(Kansas)
12. Carla 1961(Nebraska, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan)
13. Erin 2007(Missouri)
14. Audrey 1957(Illinois, Indiana )
15. 1960 Texas tropical storm(Kentucky)
16. August Hurricane of 1940(Louisiana)
17. Barry 2019(Arkansas)
18. Georges 1998(Mississippi)
19. Danny 1997(Alabama)
20. Easy 1950(Florida)
21. Alberto 1994(Georgia)
22. Florence 2018(Both Carolinas)
23. Fredric 1979(Ohio)
24. Chris 1982(Tennessee)
25. Agnes 1972(West Virginia, Pennsylvania)
26. Camille 1969(Virginia)
27. September Hurricane 1940(New Jersey)
28. Eloise 1975(Maryland)
29. Sandy 2012(Delaware, probably wanna make it on its own though)
30. Connie 1955(New York)
31. Diane 1955(Connecticut, Massachusetts)
32. Esther 1961(Rhode Island)
33. Floyd 1999(Vermont, New Hampshire)
34. Daisy 1962(Maine)

What do i do???--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Also I forgot Irene 2011 and Lee 2011 though its not a record its notable. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Probably wanna make Idai too, costliest and 2nd deadliest cyclone in the Southerb Hemisphere. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll be flipping a dice on this one. Hurricane Audrey. Good luck /w it!  Cassandra  (talk) 03:26am  February 19, 2021

There's not enough funnies! I requested it on QVFD. Tomorrow I'll probably do Carla instead. It will be easier, as I can make fun of the NWS, it was a C4 that was the wettest in 4 states. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Carla was also abandoned as the WiFi cut out. Sandy is in my userspace and I'll probably lump Connie and Diane together, into the Evil Hurricane Twins of 1955. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Q

UnNews:Error with Tropical Storm Dujuan (Auring)'s wind speed. Did I put too much vanity by saying " If this weird user called Andrew5/Gale5050/HurricaneTracker495 ever gets unblocked, I can assure there will be an RFC to get rid of the JTWC nonsense!"?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Since it's self-referential, I think it's fine!  Cassandra  (talk) 09:35am  February 19, 2021

Possible sockpuppetry

I think U u u wa wa and Captain MarcusL are socks. If you think about it, they both make crappy articles, and if that is true, he was evading the block of U u u wa wa from 15:08 on February 13-15 and should have one account permablocked, the other for a period of around a month(like Dj S).

However, it is also possible he is Nvadertim7777 who also removed ICU tags and made pointless articles and is banned for a year. If that is the case, both should be permabanned, or at least have Nvadertim's block reset.

Behaviourally, he seems to be more likely to U u u wa wa, though. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, Captain MarcusL created his account on February 12, but U u u wa wa was blocked on the 13th. Also, while both have made some grammatical errors, Captain MarcusL is at least willing to communicate in full sentences. It's {{Unlikely}} to me. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  19:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hipponias, that could still mean ban evasion.They were editing on the 13th, 14th and 15th(ie during the block). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

But what about Nvadertim7777? They seem {{Unlikely}}, though, too as Nvadertim never communicated.

Also, as you do not have CU access, I am putting it in tl's. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

But has U u u wa wa ever made copyvios on Simple English Wikipedia? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 00:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

First of all, that has nothing to do with uncyclopedia. Second of all, wow, thanks for telling me Captain has a WMF account! Third of all, no, that wasn't a copyvio. Fourth of all, his main copyvios are on Commons and enwiki(he was even EC on enwiki! He is within criteria to be glocked)!Fifth of all U u u wa wa doesnt have an enwiki account. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

{{Unrelated}}. I forgot which one is which, but one's a Canuck, the other a Briton.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:29am  February 19, 2021

Please check Captain MarcusL against both Nvadertim7777 and U u u wa wa. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add the {{Expand}} tag to the following articles

1. Hangul
2. Zhuyin
3. Khitan

Thanks, probably doesn't need to be deleted if left alone for 7 days, but 30 is a bit long. After that, it goes to VFD. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I think if these ever end up getting deleted, making them redirect to a related article would be a better idea. E.g. Hangul -> South Korea. Anyways, done.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:30am  February 19, 2021

51.79.19.31

Aimsplode (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser banned the IP for indefinite, hardblock with TPA and email revoked. I say we convert it to a softblock and shorten the length to no more then 5 years. (see here.)

On a related note, proxy 51.79.0.0/17 needs a two year block and 51.79.0.0/16 needs a one year block. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Completed all of the above.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:32am  February 19, 2021

Captain MarcusL

He has removed ICU tags after a previous warning. At this point I think of a block of at least 1 day is necessary. He continues to engage in disruptive editing. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

He has also removed the following tags, so many I'm just gonna copy paste the links [9](reverted by WohMi), [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]. Yeah, no.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I threw s red warning ambox into their userpage. Any further similar repeated actions will result in me blocking them.  Cassandra  (talk) 03:36am  February 19, 2021

He understood the warning. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Great. I usually try to not go with punitive methods whenever possible, but if a re-offense is committed I have no choice but to throw a block.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:04pm  February 19, 2021

That was an L4 in WP terms right? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Yup. The red background is meant to resonate!  Cassandra  (talk) 06:04pm  February 19, 2021

6 month block needed on 45.237.168.0/24

Cross wiki spambot.

Also, Aimsplode's account on Wikipedia is 5VeBznX36pjc7J3N, in case you want to tell WP all the terrible crimes he did on Uncyclopedia, as well as Alden. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

AFAICT, Aimsplode's account was originally called Aimsplode, and the rest is history... JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 16:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Taking care of it now. And also, He knew what he was doing. He's not coming back, and if he does, I'm reserving my strongest huff (a talkpageless hard-huff) for him.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:37pm  February 20, 2021

Spambot already blocked, so i bumped the block to 5 years.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:38pm  February 20, 2021

No, I mean exposing his crimes on Wikipedia, such as at wp:wp:AN or on an admins talk page. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quesiton

does my UnNews restriction go a week from now, or only 6 days as I served a day long block? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

1 week following the most recent block. So for example, if you are blocked on the 1st day of a month, and the block expires on the 3rd day of the same month, the UnNews restriction ends on the 10th. If you get blocked again on the 13th and end up unblocked on the 15th, the UnNews restriction will apply between the 15th and the 22nd.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:40pm  February 20, 2021

Wait is it creating or editing? I need to fix Uri so it is funny otherwise it can't go on RecentUnNews --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please move the following articles to userspace while suppressing the redirects

1. 𪟧
2. Windows Media Player Why don't we move to Windows page? (note-added by Pugsley)
3. Enter Buttons
4. Nintendo DS Lite Why don't we move to Nintendo page?(added by Pugsley)
5. Tux Paint Why don't we move to Linux page?(added by Pugsley_
6. A page with only images

Not good enough to be in mainspace, as they don't fit in with scope, but at the same time deleting them is overly UN:BITEy. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I added Pugsley's suggestions here, but no, sorry, they aren't meant for mainspace period. Having them in your userspace would have the concept though. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Moved 𪟧, Enter Buttons and A page with only images to userspace. Redirected WMP to Windows XP, Nintendo DS Lite to Nintendo DSi. I chose to keep Tux Paint, simply because it has potential for an article - I might even write one some day.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:51pm  February 20, 2021 (Restored)

Proxies to huff

1. 139.99.0.0/16(3 years per WP)
2. 192.186.171.0/24(3 years per WP)
3. 45.57.208.0/20(3 years per WP)

Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, CarmellaMcGarvie and Jeanna0374 are continuing to trigger autoblocks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll symbolically revoke TPA to the two aforementioned accounts. As for the other IPs, will huff em now.  Cassandra  (talk) 11:52pm  February 20, 2021 (restored)

Please feature Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Mess up Uncyclopedia

VFH passes with 4.5 consensus (5.5/1), and it may get deleted elsewise. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Also I meant the page not the VFH page. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

VFH does not pass with 4.5. MrX blow me 17:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

IIRC +4 is the requirement, but lemme check. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

It may be +5, on second glance. However, it may require 5 votes, in which case this has 6.5, with 5.5 for and 1 against. I am not sure. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

4.5 is too low, especially if there has been an against vote and an abstention. ShabiDOO 18:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

(1) Don't know if absentions count, (2) requiring +5 is way to high because VFH gets too few votes, many get removed as stale. I think the requirement should be lowered. I will start a forum vote when I can in March.

Also, the article may be VFDed. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

No, 5 is not too high. Also, Jabberwock put that on VFD as a joke. MrX blow me 19:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes it is because Uncyclopedia:VFH/New York (state) has 1.66 votes after 54 days, some VFHs get little traction and therefore are closed as stale even without significant(or any)opposes, and VFH regulars are gone; I think +4 should be the requirement, but maybe +3. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

+4 is WAY too low of a threshold. Mediocre articles will be featured if that is the case. If there isn't an article worth featuring then an old article will be featured. Better to have nothing featured than something blah (as blah would weaken the over all quality of featured articles). ShabiDOO 20:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Also Gale please stop closing conversations (especially on another users talk page). Telling people not to add to a discussion that's still ongoing isn't done here. Even if you withdraw the request there can still be things worth discussing. We don't "END" conversations on uncyclopedia just because they become inconvenient or difficult. We do so only if the discussion has devolved into something excessively pointless or toxic, or if there was a time limit on it. A much easier way to do so is to simply say "Okay...I see your point. Never mind". ShabiDOO 20:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I concur with Shabidoo about closing discussions. MrX blow me 20:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

As for VFH issues, Gale5050, this is very simple. The reason those VFH's got "little traction" is because most people didn't think they were good enough to be featured. I haven't voted against a lot of VFH's, I think only 2 or 3, but some of those VFH's like New York are ones that I would have voted against if more people had voted for. 5 is a good number, and I think most would agree that our VFH process is working just fine. MrX blow me 20:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Yes, fair I struck it to show it being resolved. Still, +4 is not "way to low". We have 6 people who are VFH regulars, and I don't see a one vote difference being a big deal, except allowing more articles to be featured and less to be stale. In some cases it is only appropriate to do a feature at a time. We don't have enough VFH regulars for +5. However we can broadcast it on IRC/Discord. Also I will be away for like 30 minutes. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale it seems other people here beg to differ. We get more people writing and voting by fostering users, not biting noobs and encouraging quality article (not by lowering the bar and allowing mediocre votes to be feature). I had an article to be featured that only had 4 votes and was withdrawn. My response was to fully understand the lack of enthusiasm and improve the article (as should anybody else's response be). +4 is too low. ShabiDOO 20:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050, you know, now would be a good time to disengage yourself from the argument and acknowledge, if not agree with, the other users' point. If you turn defensive and/or dismissive, no one will listen to you and you may be banned again. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  20:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I still think +4 is too low, however, Shabidoo does have a somewhat-legitimate point. The problem is though, is that I could never make an article VFH worthy. I've only attempted once, on an article likely to fail, and that was months ago yet my best work. I can rework articles to a point, but I am not meant for Uncyclopedia but am a Wikipedia framed mind. I see Shabidoo has PCR rights on enwiki. When I get unblocked, my activity will significantly decrease; I only joined because Whytheonlyone told me too, I was getting into trouble on the Fortnite Wiki. And I left when I snuck back to Wikipedia using HurricaneTracker495. That sock is now blocked, but still. Uncyclopedia was not meant to be permanent for me, but temporary. The problem is people are too uncomftorable to oppose, and IMO that is a problem. I oppose a VFH I don't like(when my sanctions don't forbid it), and I would be happier if that was the case. If you don't like Hurricane Harvey you can vote against it here, I'd prefer that then stale VFHs. The only reason I made it is so I could have at least 1 FA. Therefore, it is too much to require +5, especially for writers who are not very good, though there are valid points why +4 is too low. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

This doesn't mean I don't want to help; I do; but I am saying I am not meant for that. My brain doesn't work like that. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

My sanctions also confine my content writing abilities. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale, getting a featured article requires taking criticism and critiques and advice seriously (not getting defensive or dismissive about it), putting serious effort into the articles (like hours and hours of it) and trying to improve your writing. Anyone at all could get a featured article if they work on their articles, take advantage of all the advice and critiques being freely offered and show patience and persistence. Effort, patience and valuing critiques. ShabiDOO 00:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I try putting serious effort. But it fails. I'm trying to improve it but it never works. People's brains are wired differently, which you have to accept. I lean more to facts then humor, and my sense of humor, is dull. Sadly, this hinders. I will likely hqve issues on WP too, especially with WPTC, but if I completely abandon that my other issues should be fine. my content creating skills are not good. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Also...what does my wikipedia rights have to do with anything? ShabiDOO 00:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Nothing, but I thought people may want to know. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

How is it anybody's business what rights I have on another website if it is entirely irrelevant to the conversation we are having? ShabiDOO 00:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I would argue that anything below 5 votes, especially when against votes are present, isn't a wise idea. A long time ago, 20+ for votes and not getting featured was still common. That's why I didn't feature UnRecipe:Sweet sixteen yet either.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:03am  February 21, 2021 (Restored from earlier)

Yeah, if I start a VFH forum, it's probably going to be getting rid of "stale" VFH's, not trying to lower the limit, though IMO it should be more like +4, but with an 80% requirement to post as well. This article has ~84% consensus to post right now. People are too afraid to vote  Against., and i don't like that. All are encouraged to vote on Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hurricane Harvey, be it for or against, with suggestions I can do to improve it for against, without absentions and this crazy long process; I would prefer to have a quick one with a higher fail rate, to know people's opiinoins. That's just me. Sorry for all the typos. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale, the overwhelming majority of people only vote against an article if they think that featuring it will be detrimental to the the site (or diminish the worth of other featured articles) and not simply because its not "their cup of tea". Voting against articles really frequently can create animosity and friction and if you shoot down lots of articles just because they aren't your favourite type of article you may find people won't bother helping you with pee reviews, doing you a favour or supporting your own efforts. ShabiDOO 00:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I will try not to, however, my VFH standars are higher then most, albeit I am slightly stricter with certain articles. I want it to have all of the 4 main PeeReview things; good humour, images, prose and concept. People sometimes nom for VFH with 2 or 3 of them. I also believe abstains are detrimental, since ultimately they are not counted, so I rarely abstain. There needs to be a way to stop stale VFH's, therefore this is a good way. I shoot down articles when there is a serious lack, for example if an article gets a 40 on PeeReview, I may support one that got all 8s, and oppose one that got all 9s, plus a 4 in one area. Also, if people stopped thinking that way on against votes, then it wouldn't be so bad to do one. Only reason why it's taboo is because we make it that way, something I will try to stop. I don't want people to be afraid of voting against. I also think partial voting should be used more frequently, sometimes I give a 0.5 for when I think it is near VFH standards but not quite, or 0.5 against when it's not great, but is not that bad. Rarely I'd give another increment. I think people focus too much on humour alone, and not on page length, readable prose size, overall quality of the articles, images, etc. etc. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

For me at least, the point of VFH is to act as a quality control system. As such, articles should at least have some degree of uniqueness and/or humor to them... there isn't really a set standard for what becomes a FA and what doesn't become a FA.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:39pm  February 21, 2021

Yeah, I'm just saying we shouldn't be afraid to oppose VFHs. Many users are bold and do so and personally I won't hold a grudge if you go against my VFH. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 12:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Gale5050, nobody is afraid to oppose VFH's. Please stop making false statements about many other users when you're trying to push your opinion on us. MrX blow me 20:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please restore the redirect from Foreskin

TOo short for Uncyc. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC) peepee

R-b'd.  Cassandra  (talk) 12:10am  February 21, 2021

Two requests

Please move An article that is not funny to userspace; not Uncyclopediac enough for mainspace but its bitey to delete, and ICU A page with Trump images. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please also ICU UnNews:Upcoming Wikipedia raid for Uncyclopedians!. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Done all of the above. I huffed the last one directly, out of fear of straining terms between us and Wikipedia.  Cassandra  (talk) 01:17pm  February 21, 2021

Please move that not funny one to Captain MarcusL's userspace; its his article --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Done by the aforementioned user; huffed redirect.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:41pm  February 22, 2021

Template:Tpblock

we should make a change where if an account has it it says "appeal" and for IP "request account" as it varies per --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll add it sometime soon.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:16pm  February 21, 2021

Please VFD Atheophobia

ICU quality article with expand tag expired. You should also check Category:Articles to be expanded and see if any article needs to be put into VFD. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

And please check out your protection requests and QVFD. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Taking care of it now.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:17pm  February 21, 2021

Please revert

[15]. I think they deserve a Level 2 warning; this is the 2nd time they broke an appropriate redirect. Thanks. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done by Cassie --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please delete Chir-kutt.com

Obvious spam/promotion. I think that the creater Sourav Halder should get either an uw-advert1 or uw-spam1(be soft), or a custom ambox note saying not to do it, but they need to be told that creating these spam pages aren't ok.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done  Cassandra  (talk) 08:21pm  February 21, 2021

Change in w:MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected

There was a change in w:MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected, so therefore, I'd like you to replace Template:Protected page text/cascade with this:

{{protected page text
    | image = Cascade-protection-shackle.svg
    | protection-message = This page is [[Wikipedia:Transclusion|transcluded]] in {{PLURAL:{{{number}}}|a [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Cascading protection|cascade-protected]] page|multiple [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Cascading protection|cascade-protected]] pages}}, so only [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] can {{{2}}} it.
    | suggestions = yes
    | protection-reason = Cascading protection is used to prevent vandalism to particularly visible pages, such as the [[Main Page]] and a few [[Wikipedia:High-risk templates|very highly used templates]].
    | log-text = This page is [[Wikipedia:Transclusion|transcluded]] in the following {{PLURAL:{{{number}}}|page, which is|pages, which are}} protected with the "[[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Cascading protection|cascading]]" option:
{{{pages}}}
    | main-page-links = yes
    | template-links = yes
    | who-can-edit = An [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]]
    | request-type = full
    | attempted-action = {{{2|}}}
}}<noinclude>{{doc}}</noinclude>

If there are any changes you made for the page to be funny, just leave them there. Thank you! Your userpage looks cool, and so does your talk page! – Mr. Saed ^{& Let’s chat &} 18:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC) (modified at 18:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC))

I performed the aforementioned edit, but modified it to look slightly Uncyclopedia-friendly (notably using File:Cascade-cocklock.svg).  Cassandra  (talk) 07:29pm  February 21, 2021

Also, I forgot to tell you if you can replace the word "Wikipedia" with "Uncyclopedia". – Mr. Saed ^{& Let’s chat &} 21:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

See above. Eww its circumcized make a new version of File:Cascade-cocklock.svg with foreskin lol --The ills might a bartakesome who sled beary losice knot or'd ent grubles ay, beam. (a proverb) Get 𪟧ed, fools! 20:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC) User:Pugsleyfan69420

Honestly it's better circumcised. Makes the penis more obvious.  Cassandra  (talk) 07:39pm  February 22, 2021

Pugsleyfan69420 has removed parts of this page

Hey Cassie, it seems that Pugsleyfan69420 has removed over 7000 bytes of content from this page in this change. Unfortunately, this went unnoticed and people have edited it. I have no idea how to merge the two versions together, and since it's your talk page, can you do it? This is just a reminder if you haven't noticed already. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles  20:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

OH MY GOD I'M REMOVING THINGS? I DON'T KNOW HOW I'M DOING THIS IM SORRY!– Preceding unsigned comment added by Pugsleyfan69420 (talk • contribs)

I think an uw-tpv1 or uw-delete1 or some informal general note should be given, but that's just me. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I'll just leave a message.  Cassandra  (talk) 08:21pm  February 21, 2021