From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: HowTo:Mess up Uncyclopedia
|
Score: 5.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
Never mess up Uncyclopedia. It's not good. But I found the article very funny.
|
For: 6.5
|
 Self for. I love the article in that it uses the "escalation" technique of being funny, it has a series of pages gradually becoming insane. The final page in the end, though short, is also good and concludes the whole thing. Jabberwock (talk) 13:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)- For. I've already messed up Uncyclopedia, so has JJPMaster-to do so, you need to transclude templates on CTAM to get the total amount of numbers over two megabytes. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- For. per Gale5050. Also note that, if it is featured, make sure that it puts the entire main page font as Comic Sans. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 14:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Half for Excellent for messing up Wikipedia, the evil parody of Uncyclopedia. 209.58.133.152 (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- For. I'd love to see the 'gay disclaimers' and the 'gay shop' on the main page. ~ HipponiasCUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles 10:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- For. High quality article. Cassandra (talk) 11:15am February 18, 2021
- For. What's the worst that could happen?
 PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 00:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
 Against. It's a cool article in the css-wikicodery sense, but it really lacks the comedic aspect that I'd expect from a main page feature. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz  15:07, 14 February, 2021 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Abstain for now. This is way too short and it's a self-referential gag. Needs to be expanded or, if it is a short article, needs to have a far more comedic punch. ShabiDOO 12:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- The article has changed very much after Cat's vote. Please reconsider. Jabberwock (talk) 04:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry Jabber it's still too short. I won't vote against it but I won't vote for it in its current state. ShabiDOO 13:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
UNCYC VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Self for. I love the article in that it uses the 
Against. It's a cool article in the css-wikicodery sense, but it really lacks the comedic aspect that I'd expect from a main page feature. 
