User talk:Cajek/Archive25

Cheers for Review

Thanks for reviewing The Tempest for me. Already I've begun to fix some of the points you made. If you have any more things to note about the article, don't hesitate to tell me.--Garionepsilon 10:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, you're welcome! I don't think your article needs expansion, just trimming. If I think of anything, yeah, I'll tell ya. Cheers, GE!   Le Cejak • <Apr 17, 2008 [13:32]>

Yeah, I've added some more stuff to it but I think it needs a bit more zazz. Any ideas would be nice.--Garionepsilon 17:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Something Wicked This Way Comes

Thank you Cajek! I'm glad you liked it. Please feel free to use it as you see fit. Also, I look forward to reviewing your article! Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 05:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! Now hop to it!   Le Cejak • <Apr 18, 2008 [5:19]>

LOL! Sorry! I'm working on it right now actually. I'll be done soon! Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 03:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

You are? Whoops, then I edit conflicted you when I added a comment about it having too much stuff in it... delete the damn comment, I don't care: thanks again MDL!   Le Cejak • <Apr 19, 2008 [3:34]>

How's this?

First go - what do you reckon? On the right lines, or nothing like you hoped? Happy to change it as much as you like buddy! (But I can't think of anything funny for a seventh box - I'm too British!) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:36, Apr 18

That was really cool, thank you UU! Maybe later you'll have time to review the article of many cute puppies?   Le Cejak • <Apr 18, 2008 [19:41]> don't worry about being British, it happens to the best of us.

Sheesh, give a man a minute! I'm on my way to have a look now - expect a review in a little while. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:04, Apr 18

ha, thank you fer everything, UU!   Le Cejak • <Apr 18, 2008 [21:08]>

Ta Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Take a wikibreak

Just saying thanks for the excellent review. I pretty much agree with everything you've said there, especially the concept part - I knew it wasn't all that good for VFH and whatnot, but I wasn't aiming for VFH really (I never have done, VFH > me), it was really a piece I just wrote when looking back at my own wikibreak, and partly meant as a bit of fluff to get me out of writer's block. I might improve it a bit, but I might just move on to my next article, not sure yet. Anyway, thanks again! (Side note - oddly, that's the first time I've actually used Pee Review, despite 40+ reviews.) ~~Hv 20/04 16:18

You'll write something VFH worthy eventually, everyone does. You don't have to aim for 200 vfhs, just aim for one at a time. I'm glad you liked my review, HV, that means a lot coming from you.   Le Cejak • <Apr 20, 2008 [15:54]>

Pee Review/VFH/UnNews/Have I Missed The Boat?

Hmm...Hi Cajek, your sig is so friendly and all and I had some stuff I wanted to ask/discuss so here we go...

Annoyingly my watch-list email has been screwing around recently and so I've only just seen your review on my Apocolypse expecting cult UnNews article. So first off: thanks for that and woo 37! Second of all: how does UnNews featuring work, does it just go to where the "featured article" section is or does it go under the "UnNews" section on the front page?

And also you mentioned VFH and obviously what with my n00biness I haven't submitted anything to VFH yet, let alone an UnNews article, so: do you reckon I've missed the boat with nomination for VFH here (what with UnNews being supposedly up to the microsecond or whatever)? If not I mgiht as well give it a shot, as you say, right? Er, thanks again for the review!

And just a few links for lazy people such as myself: The article in question The review

- 07:28 20 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Hey hey, long time no see on this here talk page, YTTE! First, when an unnews is featured, it goes in the "featured box" on the mainpage like everything else. If you want to put your article in {{RecentUnNews}}, go for it, but I would ask that you put your slightly older article below my just finished one on the list. Actually, I could do it for you, if you want.

So you're looking at VFH, eh? I don't mind nominating your article, if you so desire. Would you consider nominating UnNews:Something Wicked This Way Comes? My prediction is that both articles will fail, but because I'm not sure about that, I think we should give them both a shot. Thank you for the lazylinks!   Le Cejak • <Apr 20, 2008 [18:39]>

Oh so you can just put it in RecentUnNews by yourself? I always thought a hallowed administrator had to do that...I'll sling it in there now, and yes, I'll be happy to nom your aritcle (which I've read and thoroughly enjoyed by the way and have spent a little bit of time hunting through VFH to see if it's been nominated so i can back it!). If you could nominate my article that would be great, it'll be interesting also to get loads of opinions. OK, off I go to nominate your article and RecentUnNews mine. :-D - 08:38 20 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Consider your article nominated: btw, I've learned to never expect my articles to get the nomination, so don't be disappointed if it doesn't make it. Also, don't whore it, everyone (except me) hates that. When you update {{RecentUnNews}}, remember to put it one below mine (mine is newer, slightly), and to erase whatever unnews is the oldest on the list. Thanks, YTTE!   Le Cejak • <Apr 20, 2008 [19:44]>

Consider your article nomianted, too. - 08:52 20 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Cool, thanks YTTE. Remember to add {{VFH}} to the page somewhere, if you would. Like I have said: VFH is not a competition: it's a challenge.   Le Cejak • <Apr 20, 2008 [19:55]>

Yesir! Nice talking to you again Cajek. And I reckon I'm not going to succeed...but at least I'll be able to say "this was nominated for VFH!" :D - 09:35 20 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Definitely, YTTE, and if you have any other questions, feel free to ask, any time. Coolness, and good luck!   Le Cejak • <Apr 20, 2008 [20:38]>

Mordor Jalapenos

Hey, Cajek, let me know when you've got Mordor Jalapenos to a state you're happy with, and I'll put it up on VFH. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

/popping by. Just read it...LOL Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 03:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey it's that doctor that stole my kidney

Yeah... I'll give it back eventually...

You're the king of Pee Review, right? You, with the help of some others turned UN:PR around from a total standstill into a well-oiled machine.

So, Cajek, here's an idea. I'm thinking of taking Category:Rewrite and plopping it into UN:PR. Yes. All 196 articles. You see, these articles have been tagged "rewrite," but nobody knows why they have to be rewritten. It's the equivalent of giving a Pee Review with just numbers and no explanation.

The question is, do you think you and your peers pee-ers could handle such a task? I figured I'd ask before I get my ass banned for dumping almost 200 articles into Pee Review. If you do say yes, and I get banned, it's your turn to vouch for me... – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:13 Apr 22, 2008

/me ignores the slight of being ignored. I can't speak for Cajek, but I while think the queue is ticking over fairly nicely right now, I also think a massive influx could demoralise people seeing it so full again, and have the effect of driving down the number of reviews done. (I remember how few reviews were done last year when the queue was massive, before we got this whole PEEING thing going). Plus it would make it a lot harder to ensure that new requests from people actually working on their articles get picked up and not ignored. I remember last year, pre-PEEING, the thing that started me reviewing was the fact that we had a massive queue and my articles weren't getting looked at. I did 15 reviews before anyone looked at one of mine - many people lose interest if their article isn't reviewed quickly.

Perhaps a change to the rewrite templates might help - telling people if they want to rewrite an article, they can get a pee review to give them ideas on where to start if they like. I'd also recommend putting this on the PEEING talk page to see what others think about it - would they be prepared to do all that extra work when there's no guarantee it will ever be acted on? At least if someone's requested a review specifically it usually means they intend to do something with it, even if it is just a self-nom on VFH! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:13, Apr 22

Very good points. I'm trying to think of a way to break down Category:Rewrite from the massive size it is now, and I'm thinking having some more specific ideas about what to do might encourage some rewrites. But flooding UN:PR isn't the right way to go about it. I need a new idea. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 11:16 Apr 22, 2008

Whoa, interesting idea. I agree that probably all the stuff tagged rewrite is not getting looked at, but I also agree with UU that if the que was suddenly overflowing it might demoralize people. I would say take 10 at a time and put them on PR: is that possible? In all seriousness, I don't want you banned for even 1 second for anything I gave you permission to do!   Le Cejak • <Apr 22, 2008 [13:06]>

Just eavesdropping again. I think Skull's got a great idea there. I'm assuming the reviews would then be put on the articles' talk pages? Throw them up there (10 or so at a time) and I'll do what I can to help out -even though I'm not a member of PEEING or anything. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:24, 23 Apr

Peeing

Hey ho, Cajek! I've just dropped by to say: I'd quite like to try my hand, well, not erm, my hand, my er, you know... anyway, at peeing! I'm pretty sure I'm gonna be awful but I'd love to have a go. I think it would be slightly dangerous to release my pee onto the world, so would/could you set up like, I dunno, a practise pee page or something your on user-space or mine (since you're the king of pee review, sorta, I came to you...), on any random article (you could even whore one of your pages to me while you're about it...) and then sort of well, er pee on my pee, if that makes sense... thanks. - 07:29 22 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Of course! I'll choose one of my well-peed articles to whore to you, and I will be able to see better where you might need improving, if at all. Hold on...   Le Cejak • <Apr 22, 2008 [20:53]>

Try Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Object permanence, YTTE. see what you think and good luck.   Le Cejak • <Apr 22, 2008 [21:01]>

Oh thanks, I won't be able to get round to it tonight though (sorry!), what with that exam tomorrow (oh SHIT!) but I'll do it tomorrow afternoon, and see how it goes, as long as it doesn't all dribble down my trousers in an embarrassing mess, I'm happy. Thanks again... - 10:03 22 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Thank YOU for wanting to review stuff!   Le Cejak • <Apr 22, 2008 [21:04]>

Awesome on so many levels. Does this count as whoring? If so, who is the whore? Obviously not the guy who just shows up out of the blue. Blue? What happened to the wallpaper? God dam spanky I guess... MrN 13:38, Apr 23

Where you been? Why you here? Me want food! Me hung-y! You review stuff, now? Hi!   Le Cejak • <Apr 23, 2008 [13:40]>

Has it really gotten that easy for you now? You just sit their on your talk page and people turn up begging to review something! Awesome system man. Um... Ok. What's to review? It's been a while since I did one. Any requests? MrN 13:49, Apr 23

You want to review something?? Hmmm, I hadn't really thought of that... I'm sure there's something you could review around here SOMEWHERE... Man, my whoring's getting rusty. :D   Le Cejak • <Apr 23, 2008 [13:53]>

Also, Oliver Twist? Is that finished? MrN 13:51, Apr 23

I couldn't think of what else to add to that game, but, as you can see in my bibliography, I've written 11 articles since then! Any suggestions for poor Olivah?   Le Cejak • <Apr 23, 2008 [13:53]>

I've doneeeeeeeee it! - 07:06 23 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Excuse Me Sir

Can you please review this. So far, it hasn't had any takers. --The Improver talk • contribs • 19:40, Apr 24 2008 (UTC)

You're too kind

Have a template!

Rejoice, Cajek! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Thanks for reviewing, nomming, voting for, complimenting, etc. etc. It really brightened up my day. Cheers! -RAHB 23:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank YOU for writing such a cool article, RAHB!   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [3:44]>

Old page is old

Come on. 2006? Honestly, Cajek. Also, yeah. American Novel. I'll work on it in a while. I'm just not in a writing mood right now. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:26 Apr 25, 2008

Hey wait, what? what year is it? ...did you like what I wrote so far, Skullz?   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [4:27]>

OMFG YESH although the weird bits in italics, because the joke isn't carried through, seem kind of out of place. Anyway, I'll work with you on it soon. I'm just meh at the moment. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:31 Apr 25, 2008

Cool, I was wondering how you would like it. I think we have to have some kind of examples in there of writing the Great American Novel. Maybe not those specific ones, but whatevs. Any new ideas? You feelin' down in the dumps?   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [4:32]>

I'm presently working on a very long story by the name of Discord which centers around a young investigative reporter who discovers the secrets of the Universe through music, uncovers a life-altering bit of history, and also finds out that his ex-girlfriend is dating a manwhore. So my creative energy is kind of temporarily into mapping that story out, and then I'll be back writin' here. I can never stay away from here for that long... – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:35 Apr 25, 2008

That sounds pretty cool, like the movie Pi... You gonna show us sometime?   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [4:37]>

Maybe. I dunno, my stories tend to be long, and my semi-ex-quasi-girlfriend says they drag a bit. I'm still working on tightening up my writing style... besides, though, I hate the license around these parts. I might try to get this stuff published someday, and the license here would ruin that. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:40 Apr 25, 2008

Well, if you started writing How To:Write the Great American Novel, maybe we could add all sortsa patriotic shit to it.   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [4:41]>

Dude, help me rewrite UnBooks:Hospital before Led notices the vandalism!   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [4:47]>

That review, that image, that vote, that whatever

That was one hell of a review. Reminds me of one I did for AE one time. And that was an interesting image. Reminds me of next door's cat. Fat bastard, it is. Mind you, it stays off my car - I'm a good shot with a handful of gravel. Oh, and do you still want me to do another image for you, or did my shoddy response time put you off? (If it did, it'll only get worse this weekend, my sister's visiting, so I may run out of excuses to spend time on the PC!) Also, early thanks for the VFH vote (a template will be forthcoming, they usually are) - was there enough international funny amongst the British funny to suit your palate then? In other news, a kid in a Superman outfit just fell over on the street outside the window and grazed his knees. Just goes to show something or other. Finally, have a good weekend. And now, I must away to glory and/or pizza, whichever I encounter first! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Under user (talk • contribs)

Er, yeah, that was me, by the way! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:29, Apr 25

Noob. I got yer back. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:38 Apr 25

We are experiencing technical difficulties, please hold the line

I was working on your audio yesterday and I discovered too things: the laptop I'm currently using has a lousy external mike. The mike I have with me, is even worse. Hence, the audio sounds like it's being done in the middle of a truckers convention. Not to worry though, I'm going to get me a new mike today. Sorry! ~ 09:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

haha, thank you Mordillo!   Le Cejak • <Apr 27, 2008 [13:41]>

You got your new mike yet? :)   Le Cejak • <Apr 29, 2008 [2:27]>

British talk page funny goes here (Pee)

Thanks for the fantastic review (again) - considering the pee queue length right now I'm shocked it got done that quickly. I've tried to fix up what you said to, hopefully I've got rid of all those pesky, annoying typos now. Thanks again! –—Hv (talk) 27/04 20:20

Hey, you're welcome! Get it reviewed by somebody who knows what's up now.   Le Cejak • <Apr 27, 2008 [21:42]>

Meh, I might. Might just move on, not sure if it's worth finishing this or not, not really used to this whole "article" thing ;). Thanks again. –—Hv (talk) 28/04 19:20

I'd better make sure I don't edit here then. Oh, heh. Drat. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:08, Apr 27

Your Pee

I've done a second one which (I hope, I prey) will be enough, I'm still getting the hang tf the pees, I stand by what I've siad here and I hope it will prove helpful on what is esstially a superb article:)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Scat II

Ah, may I ask what would have been the score you, HV, and UU would have given? Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 16:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, uh, I don't know about HV and UU, but I think that an AAAAA ripoff is worth less than a 35, IMO. UU is british, and would have given it a 24.864. Heerenveen, similarly, is british, and would have given it a 23.979, only a tad shy of UU's scoh.   Le Cejak • <Apr 28, 2008 [16:39]>

Calling it a rip-off does not acknowledge the efforts of the author. Besides, is AAAAA truly the appropriate thing to compare the article to? It's not just ScatScatScat written over and over again: the author deliberately went through the dregs of pop culture to create a neat self-referential anthology. It is an excellent article---perhaps a niche one at that. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 16:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

but at it's core, isn't it just sound effects?   Le Cejak • <Apr 28, 2008 [18:57]>

Reducing something to its most basic elements doesn't mean much: take for example Really Big Tree. Reduce that article to its most basic elements and get rid of all its trappings: isn't it just hyperbole? The difference between Really Big Tree and Scat is that the latter is more forthright in its underlying element. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 03:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I know its just random bollocks but its rather cute and quirky and we need that to break the seriousness of stuff sometimes. At least its not I maed a yuky doody --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

thx

FOOM Thanks for voting for Why?:Burn a Furby? on VFH. Now get out there and incinerate some of those suckers!

– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:13 Apr 28, 2008

Who's the whore NOW?! True, you're only a post-whore, but STILL!   Le Cejak • <Apr 28, 2008 [21:19]>

Ta

Tha - wait for it! - nkyou! UU wanted to express his thanks for your vote for that military thing he re-wrote. Unfortunately, he asked several members of this year's winning regiment to deliver those thanks, and as you can see, they're having trouble getting to you. So you'll have to make do with this brown template instead. Cheers!

Further thanks from me. Not that I was reminded that I intended to do this by Skullthumper's template landing on my talk page or anything. No siree! Anyway, yeah, ta! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:53, Apr 28

oh you wrote it? I take my vote back. :D   Le Cejak • <Apr 28, 2008 [21:21]>

The thing! The thing!

I forgot about that! How's tomorrow sound? --THE 22:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

@ what time shall we do the thing?   Le Cejak • <Apr 28, 2008 [22:58]>

I don't have to do much tomorrow. I could do it anytime pretty much... --THE 23:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

2:30p my time, 5:30p your time sound good?   Le Cejak • <Apr 28, 2008 [23:32]>

YES IT DOES. Also, my big font is bigger than your big font.

I WIN! BWAHAHAHAHAH!! --THE 23:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

'Tis the font of Mordor!   Le Cejak • <Apr 28, 2008 [23:45]>

I might have to do it a bit later than 5:30 actually. I'm not sure yet. I'll keep you posted. --THE 20:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Whatever works. Some time today would be nice, though.   Le Cejak • <Apr 29, 2008 [20:36]>

I can definitely do it today. --THE 20:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

	Well, well, well. I never would have guessed that Cajek was stupid enough to vote for this tripe! Goes to show you never can tell.
	Thanks for voting!

Thanks for your vote Mr. Cajek sir. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:52, 29 Apr

Moar thanks

Optimuschris has been informed that you have recently helped him in some way. Therefore he has asked his assistant to create a thank you template for you. He trusts an appropriate image has been included. An image every bit as unique and personal as he's assured his recent interaction with you has been.

Fnoodle is running smoothly.

Real smoothly. In fact, too smoothly. Help me think of some weird things to do with him. Something with personality. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:57 May 01, 2008

Well, that sounds sexy, but I don't even know what he can do!   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [2:09]>

Neither do I! I'm completely making this up as I go along! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:13 May 01, 2008

coughmakehimapleasurebot GAHH who said that, and why am I here? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:21 May 1

Do you remember this discussion? In the meantime, this sounds like a really interesting thing to ponder! Let me think about what crazy stuff we could do and get back to you. Also: SysRq?! shoo! SHOO!   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [2:26]>

Ah yes, I remember that discussion, all the way back in December. I get nostalgia just thinking about it. Anyway, you know what would be crazy? Having Fnoodle deliver something like the Wikipedia Signpost to people. Except with totally useless information on it. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:47 May 01, 2008

What's the Wikipedia signpost?   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [2:49]>

It's like a miniature newspaper, which some users get delivered to them via bot. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:41 May 01, 2008

And me and you could be writers on it! And report all the latest uncyclopedia news!   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [4:50]>

Except we could do it Worst Reflections-style, a link to the page it refers to and a brief description. It's brilliant! But we need a name for our little newspaper before I go about creating it in userspace. (Should it be my userspace or Fnoodle's?) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:52 May 01, 2008

I was just thinking about it. Like, every issue could have the front page story "Uncyclopedia Wins", and a few little stats and so forth. Which forum topics are "HOT" and which are "NOT", or which users have a felony hearing that week. If I were you, I would put it in Fnoodle's userspace so that it looks more unofficial.   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [4:55]>

And every issue can include a link to the featured article with the highest number of votes that week, just to give people something else to fight over. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:00 May 01, 2008

I mean, I'm up to writing more, even though I'm a tutor, a student, and I work out three hours a week. I love this horrible, horrible place.   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [5:01]>

(outdent) So what day of the week should the whateveritis be sent out? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:05 May 01, 2008

Well, I see the UnSignpost thing looking all flashy and html-ified with a few interesting links and so forth (maybe updated by Fnoodle), and a few short articles for shits and giggles (by you and I). I would like to say everytime the little short articles are updated, we send it out? (The short articles could be just op-ed pieces about something on Uncyc or Wikis just two paragraphs long, nothing special)   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [5:08]>

I don't think it should be any more than weekly, though. Let's plan for Thursdays (not this one); I happen to have a thing for Thursdays. Oh! Random idea! Maybe we can find some of the older articles (via Special:Randompage) and post the goodies in a section of the Uncyclopedia Times (or something). Or if you know of any good websites to link to. Whatever. This is going to be fun, Cajek. But right now I gotta go to bed. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 05:12 May 01, 2008

Okay, I like those ideas. This actually sounds pretty entertaining! See you tomorrow, man.   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [5:14]>

Everybody else who happens to be here

Can I stay? I promise to stay in the corner. I just want to pet your puppy. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey! Your damn background screws my sig up! Now I'm angry! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

What the...? This isn't some pool party! Unless you bring me friendship and warmth, get your shitty sig and your filthy human body the fuck out!   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [2:32]>

No! You insulted my sig! Pistols at dawn, I say! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Pistols at midnight, I say!   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [2:42]>

Sorry, my mommy won't let me stay up that late. The best I can do is at dawn, otherwise I might wake up daddy. I don't wanna wake up daddy. He's not very nice when I wake him up. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I can't do dawn. They won't let us out of the "Rocking Chair" Hospital until noon. You see, because I'm an old person. god damn this being funny thing!   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [2:52]>

Well, at noon I'm still in school. I should be home by 4. Try to kill each other then? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Right. And then the make up sex?   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [5:15]>

Ta

Also, thanks for all the help on the article, it really made it better. Thanks! –—Hv (talk) 1/05 15:57

Hey

I see you're noodling around with this. What do you think, any good? Thanks for the cleanup by the way, it looks much better now. -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:54, 2 May

I like the ending. I didn't do that much, just formatting. In almost all of my featured articles, the pics are right aligned. Also, don't start out with a section header. What ideas do you have for expansion on this article?   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [0:56]>

Expansion? None. I like it short and sweet. I think if I were to add too much more it would just drive it into the ground and take too long to get to the punchline. Why, did you have some suggestions? -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:59, 2 May

You're exactly right. I wanted some deletion first, hehe. I would suggest only one or two sections of random swear-words. It gets long in the tooth, in spite of the good ending. You should have a middle that goes into why the town has such bad drivers. You know what I mean?   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [1:29]>

A Serious Response

Oi! Hello back! And, its my pleasure! :-D. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 02:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, when it comes to being proud of something I did, my favorite is The Complete Asshole's Guide to Time Travel, what I've written in it (I don't dislike what was added or anything.). I created the article, most of it is the original stuff I wrote. I guess I'm into sarcastic, smartass kind of humor haha. Help wise, I think for now I'm doing okay :-D. Cheers! - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 21:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, Cajek is always open! Come by any time.   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [21:02]>

Indeed! :-D. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums^{[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!]} 03:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Fanks

Thanks for the input in my Pre-Market Economy article. When I first read your review I was like OMG old man Cajek is being too harsh on mai satirez!!!!11!1 but then I saw what you meant and thought damn Cajek knows his stuff with his bajillion articles I hope I have improved on what you said in the review. Also, right now, you are probably the best writer on the site IMO :D (Plus I am just on about 3 months here) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I did get the feeling that you thought I was being harsh. I was trying to be specific in my criticism, and it might have come off as "no no no, you're not funny, here let me help you" which is definitely NOT what I was trying to do. All in all, it was a good article it just needed that push. I'll take a look later today! Glad I helped, "adoptee" DJ, and thank you for your kind words!   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [12:38]>

NotM - Thanks

SHIZZLE DIZZLE!

Cajek, you there? Come out where I can see you, I come bearing gifts! There you are! You are a VERY clever person. Why? Because you voted for me and helped me become NotM! Well done. Give yourself a pat on the back.

To reward you, I'm giving you a YTTE goodie-bag. It is a collection of YTTE memorabilia I've just pulled out of my pocket...That's one scrumpled piece of paper, a dead slug, three unidentified hairs, a strain of the bird flu virus, a morally ambiguous Olympic torch, two cows and various assorted, unexpected items. Enjoy!

YTTE would also remind you that he's still got a few miracle toothbrushes left. Toothbrushes have so many uses, and these miracles ones are great! Buy one now for a massively reduced price and enjoy their increased ease-of-use feel. 98% of the people studied said their teeth were saved by these total protection tooth brushes! Get your hands on one now!

P.S. Sorry that was so long and rambling, sorry there's no picture. You'll just have to imagine that this is a short, concise, beautiful thank you template. Also I'm hoping I'm not breaking any unspoken rule or etiquette of Uncyclopedia by giving you this thank you template!

from YTTE.

Thankees! - 16:11 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Just...

Got Sycamore's second opinion on that article you peed for me. What stood out for me (other than the fact that he thought it was an UnBook?) was that he thought I should expand the ending somewhat, whereas you said (and personally, I think) the snappy ending works better. Left to my own devices, I'd probably mesh the two ideas together and come up with pure crap. You reckon I should expand it Oh, great master? —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 17:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, have you considered archiving recently? This is like three times bigger than your normal archives... —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 18:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Less is more, IMO. You have no problem adding all sorts of little literary description. If you expanded the ending, if would ruin the flow. In fact, you should de-expand. What is that called? Unexpansion? Anyway, your article is less British-y now (thank god), and it's much better. Expansion, no. Clean up, yes. That's just my, the master's, opinion. :)   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [18:59]>

Yeah, I worked on multinationalising it somewhat. Thanks again for all the help! —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 20:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Image

Fuck it, drinking finished early - bunch of lightweights... So yeah, how's this for a first stab? Happy to make changes if necessary. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:07, May 2

That's even better than what I had pictured in my head! Thank you so much! Take a look at the article now. How's it look?   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [22:20]>

You recent VFP comment & ban

• First off, I might point out that Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol is always better than an edit war with an IP. Also, I can't seem to fathom why you would feel the need to comment on a vote that I made on VFP. Of course I don't think that voting against things makes me "cool", and, frankly, I couldn't care less. Voting is never about seeming "cool", that's why important votes (like for leaders of countries and stuff) are secret – so that people won't feel pressured by other's opinions of them. I cast my votes on VFP based on my extremely high standards of image quality, which has lead to many many many against votes. And its never personal. If you havn't got anything nice to say about someone else's opinion why not just not say anything at all, eh? -- The Zombiebaron 00:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, not to prolong the issue, but you were the one that basically called me a moron for nominating it. I don't nominate pictures, but from what I can tell, it's an excellent picture that I could never replicate, even if it is just a white picket fence. Let's just drop it, 'kay?   Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [1:48]>

Umm...what? I can state categorically that I never once called you a "moron" in so many words, and that all of my criticism of the image was just that. However, we should probably drop this issue, before either of us insults an admin for no obvious reason. -- The Zombiebaron 02:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Stillwaters is a douchebag who bans people who don't deserve it because they're gay! Don't think about it, or it'll start making sense. Anyways, FU STILLWATERS! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:07, May 3

Stillwaters? Could this mean that... Surely not. Also, what am I doing on this talk page? Also, why is it that no matter how many pairs of socks a man buys he never appears to have enough? Also, can you start a sentence with also? And I'm sure you can't start a sentence with and. MrN 02:11, May 3

But there is a way to get five consecutive ands in one sentence and be grammatically correct: "In "fish and chips", should there be hyphens between fish and and and and and chips?" That's not relevant, I just like it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 07:40, May 3

CMC

Welcome Cajek to the Glorious Cow Moo Cult!

You're in, you clearly fit these requirements and the Cows, obviously, smile upon you. You are currently a "Mud Grunt" by rank. Now the good bit: you can officially put this template wherever you want on your userpage or talk page and can add "Mgr." to the beginning of your signature, if you wish.

Promoting the CMC is always good, considering at the moment we're barely even tiny on Uncyclopedia. If you can refer users to sign up, consider yourself promoted. In time you'll move up the ranks anyway. Occasionally you'll have to put a little bit of work in here and there, but only a little bit... For the moment all you really need to do is watchlist this page. Your main task, however, is CONVERTING THE COWLESS. Have a quick read of this before you start and conversion processes. If you help swell the CMC ranks, it's likely you'll get a promotion!

I'm happy to answer any questions here. Oh and it's advised you read these (loose) rules. You are now one of the few with the Cows on your side.

Let the moo be with you!
Moo moo moo mo mooo moo!

There you go. - 08:18 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Evil

So I was gonna pee review "Evil," but I got beaten to the punch. I still want to slap down some ideas.

1. It would be funnier if these evil characters weren't in prison while being reviewed. A criminal mastermind wreaking havoc on the world is much funnier than a criminal mastermind bitching about the parole board.
2. Cthulu should be both evil and basically incomprehensible. Don't have him sit down and give "man on the street" quotes. This is a creature who is going to kill death, arise from R'Lyeh, devour the world, and consume the souls of the living!! Have a look at this flowchart for ideas.
3. Similarly, Skynet doesn't play well as a goofy schoolgirl. Interviewing Skynet at the height of its evil, and receiving fragments of mechanical-sounding (if not particularly logical) fragments, could be much funnier.
4. I think it would be pretty hilarious to interview characters who merely aspire to be evil, but are only somewhat clownish - characters like Skeletor, or Cobra Commander, or Professor Chaos.
5. It might also be funny to interview real-life people frequently perceived as evil, like Dick Cheney or Tonya Harding or Mike Tyson.

Those are my ideas. I hope you enjoyed them. --Hyperbole 22:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not so sure that wreaking havoc is funnier than them just sitting down and giving their opinion. I like number three though! Thank you, Hyperbole!   Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [22:29]>

There's a fine line

...between doing something to get people to think about things, and actually trying to sway them to your side. The first causes discussion. The second has the potential to cause serious drama. Back off a lil', kay? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:39 May 05, 2008

I got a little upset when I realized that this... thing is, as far as Uncyc is concerned, as good as MY featured articles. Oh STM...   Le Cejak • <May 05, 2008 [23:41]>

Don't be upset. It's pretty well accepted that 2005 sucked. It's just the way it is... – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:42 May 05, 2008

Dammit, I was hoping this was gonna be a Spinal Tap reference. What's wrong with you guys, huh? - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 23:44, May 5

You have no idea. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:44 May 05, 2008

Thanks for voting

Thanks for voting for that article about the sun, or something. Yeah, so I was too lazy to make a template. That doesn't make this message any less generic though. -RAHB 08:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)