Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Uncyclopedia hits milestone of ten billion articles

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

UnNews:Uncyclopedia hits milestone of ten billion articles (history, logs)

Article: UnNews:Uncyclopedia hits milestone of ten billion articles

Score: 2 deleted articles

Nominated by: ~Jewriken.GIF 15:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
For: 10
  1. N+F. It's history in the making. ~Jewriken.GIF 15:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Hell yes. Per above. Teh Rote 16:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Why the hell not. but the "spork" template should be added. Wilhelm screamer 22:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote.svg I enjoyed turning this on its ear. It was originally about how we had made more articles than they did, which is rediculous given how many articles we delete. I therefore made a logical, and simple, change. Needless to say, I was happy with how it turned out.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Fnord --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 02:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. I would so join the ENGLISH, BUT LOUDER Uncyclopedia. Parsat, or, A Whole Bunch of Mischief 02:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. wFor. That line about ENGLISH, BUT LOUDER saved this page for me. The rest was ok, but I think it is, on the whole, good enough to become an FA. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon.gif(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:08, Mar 31
  8. Symbol for vote.svg Weak For It's OK but I love articles that mirrior Wikipedia and makes em funny, like this one. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  9. Weak for. I think I read somewhere we're supposed to be a parody of Wikipedia, amongst other things. So yeah, this works. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:48, Mar 31
  10. For --MNM5150Talk Dirty To Me Failings 23:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  11. For Dsarker 22:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Against: 8
  1. Neh --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against - the article is a) in-jokey with deletionism and whatnot, and b) has only one joke there – huge numbers, which aren't all that funny. Plus, we already have something on the main page, don't we? (not that that matters, but meh.) –—Hv (talk) 31/03 20:48
  3. Graah. Sorry, but I just don't like it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 23:56 Mar 31
  4. No -RAHB 04:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Against Short; in-jokey; only moderately funny. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. In-joke. --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us.png (TalkContribsCUN) 00:41, Apr. 3, 2008
  7. Against. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 02:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  8. Against. Naw. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH