From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Six Hats
|
Score: 13 hat wearers.
|
| Nominated by:
|
Pup t 01:54, 8/08/2009
|
For: 14
|
 Nom and For, because I read this and thought "Hey, this author is really clever," and then read the PEE reviews which seem to support it. Pup t 01:54, 8/08/2009- Yeah, sure. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:56, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Beam This would be my second reviewed article featured. zh I hate me new sig 03:57 August 8
- For. per above, but I concerned that it might be overly British Mn-z 05:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Check out this Uncyclopedia article! El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 09:16, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- For I like. Nothing wrong with being British, US stuff features too.--Sog1970 13:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Per Romartus. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN17:42, 8 Aug
- For. I remember my boss trying to get us to base all our meetings around this principle in my previous job. I really could have done with this article then. Also, how precisely could this be too British? Among other things, it was written by an Aussie... --UU - natter
 19:00, Aug 8
- For. Absolutely ChiefjusticeDS 20:13, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  20:28, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Adamant for. Perfect satire and a classic example of what a parody on Uncyclopedia should be. The amount of effort put into it is apparent and thorough with two Pees. Quality and quantity: this article has both. --EMC [TALK] 20:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- For personally I think 'tis deserving of feature status.
               Sir MacMania GUN—[02:00 9 Aug 2009] 02:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. CharitwoTalk 03:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
 Against.. A reluctant against. This is a tough one as the original book suggests a possible parody anyway -though it isn't . I liked the ideas here but wonder if they have been fully realised as a comic work. Perhaps the problem is referring too much to the main source in question and coming up instead with the writer's own theory about the importance of 'hats' in general . Just an idea. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:55, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Nom and For, because I read this and thought "Hey, this author is really clever," and then read the 
Against.. A reluctant against. This is a tough one as the original book suggests a possible parody anyway -though it isn't . I liked the ideas here but wonder if they have been fully realised as a comic work. Perhaps the problem is referring too much to the main source in question and coming up instead with the writer's own theory about the importance of 'hats' in general . Just an idea. --
03:44, Aug 10 03:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)