From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Rich guys who blow all their money on expensive whores
|
Score: 13
|
| Nominated by:
|
MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:56, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 14
|
- Nom and for Everyone should vote for this. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:56, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:20, 22 February 2011- For. whores --Sog1970 10:37, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
- For. ~
   13:17, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
- For. rich guys. Aleister 13:37 22-2-'11
- For. whores. -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 18:31, Feb. 22, 2011
- For. Hmm. I'd like to clean it up a little, but why not? User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:40, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. My god, the pictures alone make this pure groove Shabidoo 21:39, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Dame
  13:31, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Yep
 (talk) 05:35, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I always thought this was funnier than the pee review gave credit for.
 Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 04:49, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Sterling work, you totally pulled it off. -- Prof. Olipro
 KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:00, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  01:04, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, good enough, now. Could be better, but whatever. 1234 ~
 08:25, 5 March 2011
|
Against: 1
|
Sorry to shit on the orphan, but whilst what's there is very funny, there's not a lot of it... much like the portions in expensive restaurants that rich guys blow their money on -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:21, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. Starts off with a preposition but then wanders around a bit without really building up to anything in my view. It's ok but don't see it as a feature. Sorry.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:49, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- You should do that, Jazz-man. Anyhow, 'sa decent piece. 1234 ~ 04:09, 23 February 2011
- You're right, though. It's really not ready yet. Hence the moved... yeah. 1234 ~ 19:32, 23 February 2011
- Comment. Dammit. Well,call me Dexter. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:37, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Why call you Dexter? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:43, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Because Lyrithya changed her vote because of something I said. Man, she really needs to nominate one of her articles so we can do that to her. User:Mrthejazz/sig 14:04, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Mon, I meant no foul; apparently I voted on several things without looking at them the other day... I don't know why I did that, but in the interest of overall fairness or some such nonsense, I went through and looked at them, to see if how I voted was really how I felt. This is just not VFH-quality to me as it is, as would have been another one if the guy had not changed it extensively in the meantime. But if you want to take it spitefully, I can't really stop you or even blame you, really, although that would be even more arsish than what I did. 1234 ~ 15:38, 24 February 2011
- Comment. Trust me, there's no spite involved, I'm just ribbin' ya. Remember, I'm the crazy one. That is my idea of a joke. User:Mrthejazz/sig 05:05, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
- What if you've cause other people to get... ideas?! 1234 ~ 05:14, 25 February 2011
- You'd dare hold a mentally ill person responsible for his actions?User:Mrthejazz/sig 05:19, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
- As another mentally ill person, would I not be within my rights to do so? 1234 ~ 05:20, 25 February 2011
- Comment. I added some stuff and junk. User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:53, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. 
