Uncyclopedia:VFH/Prince and the Revolution

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Prince and the Revolution (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Prince and the Revolution	Score: 11 Machiavellian Funky Purple Sex Dwarves
Nominated by:	Mhaille
For: 12	Its a Sign o' the Times. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) For. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 23:50, Mar. 12, 2008 For. Something told me to vote for this excellent article... MrN 23:56, Mar 12 For. It's been a long time coming, but I kno-o-ow, that this article is awesome. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC) For When it is featured, we will party like it is 1299. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC) For Go ENeGMA Go Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC) For --THE 21:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC) For Parsat, or, A Whole Bunch of Mischief 01:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Yaha --Moneke 11:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC) DIG Kiss. --THINKER 13:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC) For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC) for. got a sufficient number of chuckles from me. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1	Non - Judged on its own merits and by VFH standards, I think it just didn't make it, though the first image did make me chuckle. --Knucmo2 14:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I found it boring and hard to pay attention to. --DyslexicRetard 10:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC) Abs. Not among its author's best work, to my mind, and just a bit meh. Having said that, I can't abide the music of the poison dwarf himself, so that may not help me appreciate the finer points of the article... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:09, Mar 17 abs Per them. -RAHB 20:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC) abstain: I prefered the author's best work a lot more.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.