Forum:Jack Phoenix For Sysop!

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Jack Phoenix For Sysop!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5828 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Well I suppose the first question would be "don't we have VFS for this?" Well the answer is shut the fuck up yes, but this is a special case. Jack Phoenix is a Janitor Sexy Janitor (yes check the listings, i'm not fucking you) as a Janitor he has administrative access to Uncyc but is bound by Janitor rules and policy. If we voted him sysop, he would be unbound by (some) of these policies on this wiki, allowing him to actively contribute as an admin more, without pissing off the resident admins.

Opped. As per 24/0 votes below, and after consultation with other administrators. Now go hassle him to clean up Special:Newpages, and leave me to my studies. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Votes

Score: 24 sexy janitors

• For - Well as above really (Bonner) (Talk) Dec 31, 23:01
•  TheLedBalloon uses PHOENIX DOWN! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:34, Dec 31
• Comment - won't this mean that we'd have a COOL AND SEXY ADMIN? — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - He's always whining about not being able to block fails. STFU already! — Sir Manticore 11:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - Per Wehpudicabok --AAA! (AAAA) 13:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For, as per his first infiniblock yesterday. *sniff* They grow up so fast :D -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Meh. 4. —Миша13 18:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - Sexy Janitor Sysop FTW —Pinky^talk 18:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Fur --THE 20:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - we need a sexy person to run this wiki --Æ 22:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Conditional For Only if we still get VFS this month. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• For --Az1568 16:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Foah. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 02:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• ++FOR ...unexcusable...this must be rectified immediately.
• For Unless someone can present to me a 10 page paper stating why he should not be one. --Mr. Alberto "Letters" ℜwg ☃ FU ☃ 21:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• For, per the cabal. GHe (Talk) 19:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Four --Phil.e. ^{( Talk )} 20:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - If I voted against him, he might ban me. Also, why not op the man? --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 14:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - Why not, it just gives him status. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 18:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• For MrN 19:40, Jan 7
• 01000110 01101111 01110010 --Imperator█Dark_Apostrophe█The Memory Hole 21:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
• For --EMC ^[TALK] 23:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Agreed~Fag x FS
• For so long as I get a banning.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   22:24, 10 January 2008  

Admin discussion

• I personally have no objection to this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• The only thing is, it would take a position for the local natives waiting to be sysopped. ~ Mordillo where is my FUCKBAG? 09:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thought it over, I'd place that on VFS if open it this month. Altough Jack already has the abilities, de-facto, he should get the communities' approval, like the normal everyday user. BTW, my remark doesn't mean that I'm not enamored with him like all the other girls. ~ Mordillo where is my FUCKBAG? 12:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Oooh I'm writing in the admin section. I'm such a badass.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, if he gets to, so do I. Jack was on VFS, where Zombiebaron said a separate vote would be needed. — Sir Manticore 18:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)