Forum:Forest Fire Week 3.14: Reloaded
Imma make this quick, because if I write/talk for a long time, I ramble. Anyhow, we need a new forest fire week. There are a lot of shit articles still on the site, and this is probably the fastest way to find a ton of them and kill them, WITH FIRE! So fuckers, lets get our flamethrowers at the ready!
New Forest Fire Week?
- For. B-be-because I w-wan-wanted t-t-to c-clean u-up u-uncy-uncyclopedia... *Denza runs away sobbing... in a french maid outfit... its pretty cute -- 19:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- BURN IT WITH FIRE! -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 19:50, Aug. 13, 2013
- Against. Too much collateral damage. Lord Scofield Stark 19:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. -- The Zombiebaron 19:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Rare boner for something Denza suggests. When I think of some of the utter shite that we have here giving every new user the wrong impression every time they click on something, I think...well, I think it's time for a new Forest Fire Week. -RAHB 20:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- RAHB's dick is forever exploding. Poorsoft (talk) 08:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Fire. I'll take you to burn. — SG1 [citation needed] 20:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Fire, fire! Uhhhuhhhuhhhuhhh! RedHot (talk) 21:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Against. If people could get this excited about VFD, more bad stuff would get deleted throughout the year. >_> 00:46, 14 August 2013
- For.. Because I don't want to get beaten by Denz. 03:54, 14 August, 2013 (UTC)
- Good kitty... hehe... Denza strokes CatTheColourful in a skimpy schoolgirl outfit... -- 03:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Correction; I don't want to get beaten by Zombiebaron. 03:57, 14 August, 2013 (UTC)
- DAMMIT CAT WORK WITH ME HERE. Plus, in case you didn't notice "Good kitty" actually works with your username. -- 03:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Correction; I don't want to get beaten by Zombiebaron. 03:57, 14 August, 2013 (UTC)
- Good kitty... hehe... Denza strokes CatTheColourful in a skimpy schoolgirl outfit... -- 03:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- For Converted. Need to free up some prime subjects to encourage writer sponge. --mAttlobster. (hello) 19:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Against. No more fires!
- For. why not. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Per RAHB — 21:15:13 2013/08/14 UTC
- Against. Garbage is what makes this site what it is. Garbage. Why mess with a good formula? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Against. We're not gonna attract new users by destroying their stuff. Say I want to read about Gun's and Roses, I'd rather read something mildly funny than nothing at all :D -- Mattsnow 22:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- For. Things are different now. If we want to set ourselves apart from the other wiki...we really ought to improve the quality of the articles here. The other wiki can keep every measly word ever written...but I think we ought to torch 90 percent of this place if we want a minimum quality to our project. --ShabiDOO 22:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Against. VFD is not very active at all. Also articles can be fixed not deleted. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- @Frosty: FFW assumes that people will fix articles within the grace period. So fuck yeah! 03:41, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Exactly, it "assumes", without any indication that this will actually happen. 07:38, 15 August 2013
- @Frosty: FFW assumes that people will fix articles within the grace period. So fuck yeah! 03:41, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- We delete more articles than we create.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 07:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- For. Good new articles are always better than old bad ones. And even though we delete more than we create, it still better to have a small amount of good stuff rather than a lot of crap. Anton (talk) 15:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- For. I actually have no idea what this is, but it mentions fire and fire is shiny so yes. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 15:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Against. We need more VFD activity. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 16:41, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- For. User:Matthlock/sig2 20:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Might I point out the hypocrisy of the people who are voting "against for more VFD activity" are very rarely actually seen at VFD. Even after my own griping on the issue awhile back. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 17:06, Aug. 15, 2013
- Maybe if these guys from Africa who I barely know would quit bothering me when I'm on Facebook or Skype, I would get more done. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Might I point out the hypocrisy of the people who are voting "against for more VFD activity" are very rarely actually seen at VFD. Even after my own griping on the issue awhile back. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 17:06, Aug. 15, 2013
- I am both for and against this, until you open up my box and observe me. --Schroedinger's cat 03:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
I'll raise the stakes...
If this is passed, I will draw some more stuff, and upload it. -- 20:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Proposition for Illogicopedia
If we're going through deleting articles like crazy than we're bound to find some articles that might be perfect for Illogicopedia; I've looked and there's a template for moved stuff, I feel like not only will this benefit Uncyclopedia but this will also benefit Illogicopedia as a whole since we'd be increasing it's article count 10 fold and saving all the articles that are amusing terrible instead of just terrible. I will try to spork a template for a "move to Illogicopedia" template for this FFW; in fact from now on I'm going to be tagging such articles as requesting to be moved to Illogicopedia just so the few said articles can be saved. After all, there's a better place for those articles right? It'll also reduce the clutter in VFD and allow it to save space for those truly terrible articles. Sounds like a good idea right? RedHot (talk) 08:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. 09:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Be sure to make a category that the template will put the articles into and make sure the admins know about it so it can be taken care of. We're also going to have to have a small review process probably because I don't want people to be thinking we can just throw any old bullshit onto Illogicopedia. Good for ?pedia as they're suffering inactivity and I want them to stick around. -RAHB 15:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
I can haz Green Eggs and Spam???
You know these spam pages we've had flowing in lately? I say we keep them and then nominate them for FFW for shits and giggles. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 16:54, Aug. 15, 2013
- I think if you check you'll find it's mostly shits. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
image burning?
I think we should look in our multimedia collection, too. Images could be burninated if they are low resolution, poor quality, copyvio, pornographic, obscene, ... We traditionally look solely at text content (articles) even though our image-to-article ratio is currently 96,299 to 29,979. (This probably happened because people keep uploading new images without first looking in the gallery for images that would work just nicely – and are probably better.) 11:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- There's no rule or anything against burning images in the FFW bonfire. It has been a few years now since Lyrithya and I burned Special:UnusedImages to the ground; everything in there needs to be huffed. -- The Zombiebaron 18:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- oh yeah. How come nobody does it? (And by the way some unused images are good quality.) 。◕‿◕。 02:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's a heavy undertaking and subjective in some areas so most of the time we don't spend much time on it. Also, generally speaking we're not deleting pornographic images solely for being pornographic. That was like, a big thing, remember? -RAHB 03:35, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, really the only images that are fare game for burning are images that are unused. If you encounter unused images that are of good quality you should use them on a page. -- The Zombiebaron 18:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's a heavy undertaking and subjective in some areas so most of the time we don't spend much time on it. Also, generally speaking we're not deleting pornographic images solely for being pornographic. That was like, a big thing, remember? -RAHB 03:35, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- oh yeah. How come nobody does it? (And by the way some unused images are good quality.) 。◕‿◕。 02:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Shabidoo burning
Could we use this opportunity to carry out the well needed task of burning everything shabidoo has written, his unsolicited comments, his verbial attitude, his annoying tournament and any and all traces of his presence on the wiki for once and for all?
- Yes. Yes. Absolutely. Please. --ShabiDOO 03:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Fuck yeah! LOL -- Mattsnow 18:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- And what about Shabidoo himself? Anton (talk) 19:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. It is a must. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 21:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- This is a joke isn't it? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Incense burning
I think we should use this opportunity to burn all of the incense sitting in the back closet. It would be a nice way to brighten up the Forest Fire week and perhaps cover the smell of burning corpses. -RAHB 03:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Pee burning
It burns like Hell when I pee. We should capitalize off of this by combining FFW and Pee Review in some way. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 09:45, Aug. 18, 2013
- Boner. I'm not sure how that would happen, though. 。◕‿◕。 10:08, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- For. The idea is cool. Anton (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- I'm going to set your pee on fire after you wet the bed tonight. --ShabiDOO 19:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
When will this be held?
I think we should hold FFW during the week of August 25. I already started compiling a list of pages I intend to tag. 。◕‿◕。 09:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that is the plan. We will start rolling out all the fancy templates and sitenotices over the next week. -- The Zombiebaron 18:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Why don't we make it two weeks this year just so that there will be more time to tag all the crap that accumulated? Then it'll be "Forest Fire Fortnight" or F-Cubed. 。◕‿◕。 11:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
There's an article I want to tag
I want to tag Pokémon (video games series), but it's protected. (Bumping should be OK for this forum since this is FFW.) 。◕‿◕。 13:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)