User talk:Under user/Archive 3
I'M VERY OFFENDED THAT I HAVE NO LIFE!!!11!![edit source]
Whew, now that I've got that out of the way, I want to say "Thank you for saying my articles are good!" I'm afraid that I don't know where to direct you. You need an article of mine that's crappy and needs just quick guidance? I... I wish I had a template that would automatically whore my articles... jeez... I wish... -- • <-> 15:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
WARNING THIS TEMPLATE WAS CREATED TO DISTRACT YOU!!! | LOOK AWAY!! |
VFH American (Species)[edit source]
Were you trying to vote, or did you just feel an urge to scribble your name? SmackBot 10:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Let this be a warning to you kids: don't try to vote when things at work are going mental! (Cheers SmackBot!) --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- We don't work in mental institutions, we're inmates with sufficient privileges to use the library computer. SmackBot 10:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
HowTo:Fuck Off[edit source]
I am very embarrassed that I took so long to get to your article. It has been Hell week, both at home and at work. Now I have nearly a whole day with no back-to-back crises looming, so I read Fuck Off and added some comments at the bottom of Cajek's pee review. I congratulate you on taking Cajek's review seriously and doing so much revision on the article. Cheers, ----OEJ 15:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Review: Object Permanence[edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Hey UU thank you so much for the review, it was pretty good! I've revised it, so if you want to (only if you want to) you can come by and take a peek at the changes. Add any additional comments to the Pee Review, if you have them. Thank you again, and I'm looking forward to your judgement! -- • <-> 23:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Photo Request for UnNews:Curious George Sequel has been released today[edit source]
Hi, I was wondering if you could chop' a photo for this article, seeing you chop' other photos. It has a good image already - but I think it should have another. I'd like I'd like the source of this image [1], but at the bottom where it says Curious George, I'd like it to say "Curious George stabbs the Man in the Yellow Hat", thanks--Sir Manforman 00:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe. I'm a tad busy right at the moment, but if I get some quiet time (and you promise not to be as creepy as Serq is getting in RadicalX's corner) I'll see what I can do. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Manforman has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
--Sir Manforman 20:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Review Request[edit source]
Hi Under User, I saw that you were on PEEING. Could you review Top Hat for me? Thanks. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
/me gingerly peeks under manhole cover. DAMN! Somebody else got to you first. -- • <-> 01:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind, actually. But thanks for offering to do it in spite of your schedule. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
You made the right choice...[edit source]
Thanks for voting for me! Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 21:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Excellent voting[edit source]
Thank you! For voting for Books never written! Cainad thinks you deserve no less than a beige, green-bordered thank-you note for your support. So that is what you get. Seriously though, thanks. Leaving the article un-featured as a gimmick seemed... silly. |
--The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 02:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you[edit source]
--Acolyte CUN RA My cat is better than Benson talk stalk 03:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
What was that noise?[edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Yeah, I agree with your score. Usually while I'm writing something in this story style I have an ending and a beginning in mind. With this, I didn't really have any idea at all what I was doing. In my very recent articles the story carries me along without me knowing where it's taking me and it comes up with a very surprising ending. This didn't do either, and your score reflected that.
While I was reading your review, I was really refreshed with the honesty and the advice was "spot on". More than that, though, I think you summarized my entire style. I'm gonna have to think about how I can incorporate your advice. Thanks again man! -- • <-> 12:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:New movie sequel announced: Snakes on a Bus[edit source]
Dude, like, we both gave him the same score! BTW, your new picture is freaking me out with it's eyeballs all movin'. Anyway, nice to see you, thanks for plagarizing my misc thing!! -- • <-> 15:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I know. Even more freakily, we then picked the same article to review next. /me looks around warily. Where are you man?
- As to the misc thing - it's as good a way as any to deal with an un-necessary box.
- As to the pic, that's the idea, glad you likes it.
- Good to see you too. Warn me next time, I'd have tidied up! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
lolzors! -- • <-> 15:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Edit conflict a-freakin'-gain! Stop it! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've been thinking: I don't think the misc IS unnecessary! It adds points, it's there "just in case", and it rounds the score to x/50
- You know what you wouldn't have a chance of edit conflicting me with? one of MY articles!!
- I left a note at the top of one of those saying "I'm here to review this." Did you not see it, mr. Googly eyes?
- Googlah eyes
-- • <-> 15:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I dunno about misc - I've never seen anything in there that couldn't be put in the final box, or left out altogether. Still, it's there, so something must go in it!
- I'll review another of yours soon - you always have a few articles up for review, and I try to review a few by other people as well!
- Yeah, I saw it - when I went to save my review - not sure what happened there!
- By the by, about your WotM nom - congrats, very much deserved, if you weren't up against SoSo (who has deserved it for ages, it was a travesty ZB beat him last month) you'd have my vote for sure. Maybe next time?
- Buggley eyes! [[2]] --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- 9. Well, that's why I invented template:Pee for everyone's convenience.
- 17. We agreed almost exactly on both of the reviews we edit conflicted. That weird computer one was so full of technobabble (WHORING NEW ARTICLE I JUST WROTE!!!) that I wanted to scratch out my googlah eyes.
- 1. WotM: Thank you! I haven't even heard of SoSo, but I'm new. It's quite an honor, yes. I feel like I can pee review people with impunity now.
-- • <-> 15:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- pi. Never heard of SoSo? Here, 7 features: Fire hydrant, You are dead, UnNews:6-year-old boy receives $20,000 in government subsidies for insect torture research, Pufflebump Snugglekins, Long walks on the beach, Fire Hydrant 2: Rehydrated, UnNews:5th period Chemistry sub is a total bitch, and current nom: UnNews:My son makes the play of the game. There you go, that's why I'll vote for you another time!
- I'll have a look at that latest example of your blatant whoring later. Hmm, /me thinks: have you been nommed for WhotM yet? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I would probably win Whore of the Month, if that's what you're asking.
OH SHIT THIS TEMPLATE WAS CREATED TO DISTRACT YOU!!! | Don't do anything it says!! |
-- • <-> 16:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't even know you were nommed! I just went by that page, saw CS and said "He deserves it." THANK YOU FOR THE NOMINATION! -- • <-> 21:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Pee Reviews needed[edit source]
Can you review Most Haunted and my most recent UnNews article please? Thanks, -Razorflame 16:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Er, maybe tomorrow - I'm about to leave work and I have a busy evening lined up! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok, maybe tomorrow then :)
-Razorflame 16:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Right, there you go, one review of Most Haunted. And that's all I have time for tonight. I'm planning to do another couple of reviews at the weekend, among many other things, so I may get around to the others. Can't promise to, mind, I'm a busy guy at present! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 23:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, that was the only one that you needed to review because the others were already reviewed by Cajek...-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 03:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Classy[edit source]
Here's a handy user template! -- • <-> 20:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
NEW UNIB[edit source]
I've just added a new UnNewsInBrief article in the page that I told you about earlier. Maybe you could have a look at it and tell me if you think it would be worth making into a full fledged UnNews article? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for voting for Cancer[edit source]
Good Lord, Man! I must say, you resemble a complete shit-wit! |
Aaawww... Under user/Archive 3 has been diagnosed with cancer. scrotum cancer. Yeah. Incurable. |
Have a weird little user template! -- • <-> 22:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Most Haunted[edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Thanks for the review. Anyways, could you specify what lines you really didn't think worked well? Also, maybe you would like to go through and help me with it? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 04:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dude - time constraints! I don't have time at the moment, life is a maelstrom of whirling shit, and it's all I can do to find half an hour to check my talk page! I'll have a look if I can, but really don't have much free time to work on anything at the moment. Keep going. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at the history for the page Most Haunted and tell me if you think that what I added adds to the humour of the article, or just subtracts from it.
-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 05:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Feel the power of science!![edit source]
The Led Balloon has awarded with the gift of sciencey knowledge, because he can already tell that you are smarter than that asshat judge was. | |
Thanks for voting, and remember, |
Thanks for the vote, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:20, Nov 12
Scientifically speaking, that rocked. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 22:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Suspicious[edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Thank you, UU! I know, I'm trying to fix it. I think I covered all your (really good) suggestions, so I'll put it back up on Pee Review. Nobody's reviewing my articles (because they're too long), so I'm just gonna have to wait until you (or somebody with patience) reviews it again. -- • <-> 23:52, Nov 13
Undah Usah![edit source]
"Please ma'am, hand over the deed. No ma'am, I'm not joking, I'm somber, which is the only emotion I'm capable of experiencing." Ooooh...too bad about your house...still, thanks for voting for UnNews:Record percentage of children dressed up as mortgage foreclosure bankers this Halloween! |
Thnx!!! --THE 19:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The villains begrudgingly thank you[edit source]
Thanks for the votes! Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Change your vote?[edit source]
Brazilian-Amazon Rainforest is now Why?:Destroy the Rainforest. :-) --EMC [TALK] 23:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Why?: Is a raven like a writing desk? Pee review... in case you don't see my reply on the page itself[edit source]
Thanks for the review... I have to say I was expecting a poor score from the word go... But I certainly wasn't expecting a review this helpful, so thank you! I've already adjusted the view of the "Rohypnol joke" and plan on taking this article to a far better place using your suggestions. D'you reckon that I could do this up enough to be featured? It might have a good enough concept (i.e. based on famous literature etc.). Whimsy ahoy! <talk.work.?pedia.
- In fact, I think you deserve a Golden Shower for your efforts. Too often reviewers are like "HATE HATE HAT it doesn't have emetophilia in it AAAAAAAAA!" with a score of -42 so I'm really happy you were impartial in your review.
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
- Challenge, good sir, is the point of my life. However, I think my biggest enemy is procrastination... I find it VERY very very difficult to finish what I start (seen: Venetian Snares, my vows to awesome-ify my article Aiden along with loads more) <talk.work.?pedia.
Putting the pee back.[edit source]
Thanks for sorting my pee-review vandal... I hope that you thought 5 was perhaps a little unfair! There is taking the pee, and then there is un-screwing the unary from the wall, stuffing it down your trousers and running off home with it! MrN 10:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
My Apologies[edit source]
For messing up your vote on Votes for Deletion... No Idea how I managed that... MrN 18:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Congrats![edit source]
CONGRATULATIONS!!! You have won a raffle for tickets to
Of course, when we did the raffle we were drunk, and all the other tickets except yours were spilled and blown away, but still! Congrats!
Enjoy the drunk olympics! And stick around--the "black coffee and ice pack" olympics comes the very next morning!! --THE 00:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
You were Saaaaaying...?[edit source]
Hey UU... Maybe you were smoking the JaZz CiGgArRetTeS (sp), but you said that you liked your quick look at Meaning. You can review it any time if you want, and I would appreciate that. Nothing's stopping you except YOUR OWN WILLPOWER. • <-> Nov 29, 13:56
Thanks for your vote![edit source]
On The Color Problem! Guess I forgot to remember to say! MrN 19:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Meaning[edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
As always, an awesome review. I'm gonna go over it, like you said. I hope your job isn't too horrible! (Man, I wish I had a life!) :D • <-> Dec 1, 11:21
How very amusing![edit source]
"(Ljlego, that means you too!)" Took me a coupla seconds to understand that that wasn't {{USERNAME}} abuse.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Do you deserve RotM?[edit source]
Cuz we could nom each other and see who truly deserves the title. How many reviews have you done? Are you just a Cajek's article reviewer? Do you think you deserve it, cuz I'll gladly nom and for you! • <-> Dec 18:18, 1
Pee plz?[edit source]
Hi, Under user. Since I know you're a respected Pee Reviewer, and I need a 2nd opinion for my article HowTo:Escape Prison, would you mind reviewing it. Much appreciated-- 21:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh 'eck, I totally forgot about this, and I'm finished for the day. Er, I'll have a look at some time tomorrow. Probably. Sorry I didn't get to it today! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 18:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
UNLIMITED POWER[edit source]
Thank you muchly For allowing me access to UNLIMITED power |
~ 16:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Pee Review Thanks[edit source]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Thanks!!-- 22:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Why, hello, sir![edit source]
I must say, you look intelligent. Perhaps you'd like to partake in some of my Miracle Tonic? Guaranteed to cure what ails ya! Got a cold? Going bald? High mortgage rates? No problem for my miracle tonic!
The Led Balloon has awarded you with a FREE* case of Honest Jim's patented Miracle Tonic. | |
*Not actually free. Side effects may include just about any horrible diseases we can come up with. |
Thanks again for voting, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:08, Dec 4
Thanks for the urine analyzation![edit source]
Really, thanks. I've been needing some constructive criticizm on my GMod article. I'll get straight t o work! --Crazee Boy, OMGLOL FURRY
/smack[edit source]
You realize you created that talk page again? :) ~ 17:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. I'm going to bed now, where ill people like me should be. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 17:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Shout!![edit source]
Hi Under user. I've been in a lazy mood for the past few days and haven't had much time to work on HowTo:Escape Prison. Now that I'm in a less lazy mood, I just wanted to mention a few things:
I read the original article and considered restoring some of the original content as suggested. The final line, that tickled EMC in the review, was a strong ending, and that was the first thing I decided to include. The only problem is, I also considered adding a Staying on the Loose section as suggested, but this would interfere with the final line because if you're dead, how can you possibly stay on the loose? If you have a suggestion, it would be much appreciated.
Also while I'm here, thanks for your vote at N00b of the Month-- 00:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
*STAR WARS theme plays...*[edit source]
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.... It is a period of Galactic unrest. Star Wars was nominated for VFH, but nearly failed, thanks to the efforts of the evil lord Darth Vader. However, during the nomination, Pursued by the Empire's sinister agents, he races home aboard his starship, custodian of the stolen plans that can save his people and restore freedom to the galaxy... | |
I can't believe it finally got featured, either. Thanks for voting! |
Thanks again for voting, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:00, Dec 7
Unicorns-slash-rainbows and happiness[edit source]
Oh Shit LOCK THE WINDOWS AND BOLT THE DOORS, SOME HORNY BASTARD IS COMING TO RAPE YOU! |
||
I KNOW IT DOESN'T SOUND SERIOUS NOW, BUT JUST WAIT TILL YOU'RE ON THE BUSINESS END OF THAT HORN |
Hey UU, thank you for voting!
• <-> (Dec 8 / 15:34)
Tired Yet???[edit source]
AE has awarded you a sofa! Now go make yourself comfortable. |
Now you no longer have to stand and you can relax!!! On a side note, thanks for the help! Do you think an Example Section like in your HowTo:Fuck Off would work with my piece?-- 18:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
The Zork 4 Logo[edit source]
If it's possible. I want the 4 logo to look like the zork logo and to make it a little bigger kind of like in the 885x265 range if possible and I want it in 2 seperate images, One with the background white and one with the background black, and if possible. Try to clean it up a bit. Thanks. --NXWave 02:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
red baron image[edit source]
You are presented with one (1) package of Red Baron French Bread PizzaTM for your image for that article involving flying things.. Please note that Red Baron microwaveable pizzasTM may cause loss of altitude or engine failure. |
your image is exactly what i'm looking for, so thanks a ton! it's so good i'll probably stick it onto VFP, unless you have any objections of course. thanks again! keep up the good work! -- 04:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- No worries, glad to help! You can pop it in VFP if you want. I suspect it won't do that well, myself, but I've been told a couple of times following my "Vote for Skullthumper in UotM 'cos he deserves it more than me" campaign that I should get over my English reserve about such things and blow my own trumpet a bit. And I've always wanted a featured image. Still don't think it will be this one though - damn, looks like I just can't do it... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Jimbo Grinch 2[edit source]
Hey, that Grinch image of Jimmy Wales was great! I'm using it next week in an UnNews. I was wondering if you could also do one of Jimmy sitting on Santa's lap as a kid, but with the exact same head. That would be perfect. If not, don't sweat it. Thanks. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 07:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I meant his real head. It would be funny to see the yound Jimbo with the same head as he has now. Note that this would be before he became a grinch, which explains his love of Santa Claus. That's all. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 12:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)