From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Why?:Destroy the Rainforest
|
Score: 18 useless tree(s)
|
| Nominated by:
|
EMC [TALK] 03:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
|
For: 19
|
- Self-nom & for: I quite like it. Y tu? --EMC [TALK] 03:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Not quite shit. --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  21:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional For. Make the title Why?:Destroy the Rainforest, or something to that effect, and it has my vote. The article reads like a Why?, you just need the title change. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. I can't help but think of the Civilization series of games, where rainforests are useless. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. Deliciously American viewpoint (never thought you'd hear those words, eh?) Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 23:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- I get kind of giddy just thinking of all the stumps. And cocaine. --So So 03:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:25 Nov 18, 2007
- For Burn it down! -RAHB 01:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dig fuck trees. --THINKER 06:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- For If you could link it to the ever-useless mossy coconut, I would also vote For. But it would be an even more heartfelt For. --The Acceptable
 Cainad  (Fnord) 07:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk
 - 13:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- For per title change EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 23:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. Also per change. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. Even though I'm an environmentalist, this article is just awesome. -->:( 00:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- 'For This is amazing satire. As vice-president of the Alta Earth Club, I give it my blessing. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles)
 - KUN SEXY WH
- Short, but good. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:11, Nov 22
- For --THE 15:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- 4. FUCKING TREES! --PCgamerMofo 01:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- I do not object in the least--
 16:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
- This is Shit Soppy123 21:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
Abstain per Necropaxx. Remind me to change my vote if you do. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 06:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Vote changed. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 23:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Abstain. Certainly reads more like a 'Why?'. also felt a little short to me. Really like what's there, but greedily wanted more. I'll change to a weak for if it becomes a 'Why?' though. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 17:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
