Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnTunes:I Am The Very Model of a Crazy Fundamentalist

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnTunes:I Am The Very Model of a Crazy Fundamentalist (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnTunes:I Am The Very Model of a Crazy Fundamentalist	Score: 20 Fanatical Parodies
Nominated by:	17:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 20	For. I reviewed this and this it deserves a shot on the Main Page. Finnius has spoken.  FUCKING GENIUS. One of the best Major-General parodies I've ever read. Too often people screw them up, or completely destroy the rhyme pattern. This is clever, hilarious, true, and also in iambic pentameter. Oh, and somebody get on the audio. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:10 Jan 08, 2008 FOR awesome. --THE 20:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC) Failing to feature this article will result in Hinoa being a sad panda. —Hinoa talk.kun 20:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)  Bravissima! Now, if someone could record it so I could put it on my iPod... --Vana 23:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)  Strong For. Amusing just as a simple read, but the second time through I caught all the subtleties of it. Very nice. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 00:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC) For--Æ 01:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC) FOR Well i wrote it. I struggled for ages on this, god it was hard. --Moneke 01:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)  For. OMFG Yes! ILoveDogs 22:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC) For     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   06:39, 10 January 2008   For This is awesome --Bassguy 07:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC) For. It would be great if we had an audio, but it's quite brilliant, nonetheless. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  12:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)  Fundamental-or. I will sing this right now if I can find backing audio and get my A into F G.--thematrixeætsyou, the ultimate (talk) (flames) 00:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) For Screw you Moneke :P give me at least some of the credit! I was the one who made it good! --DJ Irreverent 04:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Wow   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 11 (15:01) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 02:41, Jan. 12, 2008 For. Audio would be a bonus, but this is a win even without it. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)  For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) Yore -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)  For. the whole song is very clever wordplay and has some smart puns, but the tagline made me LOL.Fuzz 12:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Abstain There's no audio to it. I want audio! Of course, if someone did a shitty audio it would ruin it. I'll have to give it some thought. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:46, Jan. 8, 2008 I put that in my review comments, Kip. Without the audio he got a 44score from me...with audio, i would probably go as high as 48 ALMOST PERFECT! (well, imho) edit: also [plea for audio] in village dump MOAR AUDIO! Parsat 19:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC) Audiostain. The lyrics are great. Now someone let us hear it! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:32, Jan 8 Comment I would do the audio if I though I could gather 50 people from some church. Or if I got someone who could actually sing, and edited it to sound like a choir. Hmmm..... - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 23:54, Jan 8 Skullthumper: Actually, it's iambic octameter, I think. Eight iambs per line, whatever that's called. Firefox doesn't recognize "octameter," but still. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 00:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC) You might be right. I just remember getting the question right in some stupid trivia competition, but it was only because the person running it sang the question to the tune of the song. Cheap, really. I think that was the only question I got right. Iambic something, you know. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:55 Jan 09, 2008

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.