Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnBooks:Jimbo's Love Life: The Story of Wikipe-tan

Article: UnBooks:Jimbo's Love Life: The Story of Wikipe-tan	Score: -3 Love Lives
Nominated by:	NXWave 00:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 8	Nom & For -- I can't belive that this wasn't featured yet. --NXWave 00:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC) For. I voted for it last time, and I'm voting for it now. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 02:28, Jan. 5, 2008 For'd last time -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC) I just want it to be Quasi-Featured, that's all. --L 04:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC) For EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 06:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC) For as per L. Also, I move to strike L's vote because it doesn't link to his userpage and nobody's complained about that for a while. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 18:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Comment. -- He's Zork Implementor L people. A man of few words. --NXWave 02:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)^{[citation needed]} 11:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 11	I can. ~ Mordillo where is my DOUCHEBAG? 01:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Against. - not so good--Æ 02:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Against No fancy template from me though. -RA HB 02:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Against. Doesn't turn me on. -->:( 03:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Against. I also, as well.--Randy Bentwick 16:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Against. I reviewed it and found it to be a decent read, but not highlight, and I stick with that assessment. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Against. Pretty old and not terribly funny. ~ QUILz ( talk \| contrib ) 18:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Weak Against - Has some potential, but needs work. --*Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 04:30, Jan. 6, 2008 Against - Didn't really get a chuckle out of me. - UnIdiot \| Talk? \| Theme -05:24, Jan 6 Against. - I'll pass thanks (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 6, 11:55 Against. - Humor density of 0.00001 kiloJokes/Paragraph is too low for an Uncyclopedia article --Loonycyborg 12:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)