From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: The Pun Invasion of Uncyclopedia
|
Score: 16 inappropriate malapropisms and other enema at the gates
|
| Nominated by:
|
Mhaille
|
For: 17
|
- To pun is to treat homonyms as synonyms, but to err is humorous. -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- Self-reforence. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:40, Sep 2
- For. Though I swear to God, one more pun, and I'd have to punch someone right in the mouth. --Mr. Monkey
 Pant-hoot here. 23:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 For. Despite Spang's brand new JS annoying the living fuck out of me, and not disabling when I hit "disable". Also, good article. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:48 Sep 02, 2008- I've always wondered why this hadn't been
 ured yet. Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sexy - UnIdiot |
 | Talk | Contribs - 00:40, Sep 3
- For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Emphatic for. –—Hv (talk) 3/09 19:18
- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  23:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. <insert MrN-related pun here> </insert> Le Cejak • <19:07, 04 Sep 2008> 19:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Fore. Quite titty, really. I mean witty! That was a Fraudulent slip, not a bun. ----OEJ 03:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. I love bad puns. --UU - natter
 10:53, Sep 5
- Fort -- complaining Ape (rape) (Riot Porn) 19:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- fork. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. 84.198.24.142 19:25, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. No reason. --Greyweasel 08:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- For - Puns are the highest form of humour. Wait, did I just contradict Oscar Wilde? <_< >_> You heard nothing. – Kip > Talk • Works ••
         11:13, Sep. 10, 2008
- For. Oscar approves. So do I. ~ 19:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
- Not For The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 00:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Abstain. Usually, I just vote against anything self-referential. I mean, we stick something referencing Benson's House of Pancakes on the front page - is anyone going to chortle at that besides the people on this very voting page? But I'm not gonna vote against this one. Nope. Not gonna vote at all.
 pillow talk 23:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough... To make a punctual reply: I agree that most punters will be punted backwards by the surreptitious pancake reference but hopefully that one puny in-joke punctuates what are otherwise punny punchlines. Hopefully it does not punish the rest of the article too much. /me shoots self ... MrN
 00:10, Sep 4
- Oh, also... It's not really about Uncyc... MrN 00:18, Sep 4
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
For. Despite Spang's brand new JS annoying the living fuck out of me, and not disabling when I hit "disable". Also, good article. 
19:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)