From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Sherlock Holmes
|
Score: 12 elementary Holmesian deductions®
|
| Nominated by:
|
               Sir MacMania GUN—[13:30 10 Aug 2009]
|
For: 12
|
- Self-Nomination and
 For. Mostly favourable reviews, as linked. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:30 10 Aug 2009]
- Marvellous!. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 13:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hellz yeah, my dear Watson
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  17:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. I didn't laugh. Style
 Guide 19:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Wait. You didn't laugh and voted For? You sure? I hope so. Otherwise I'd lose a vote. No, I didn't say anything back there. Yeah, I'm pretty sure. Ahem. Sir MacMania GUN—[19:06 10 Aug 2009]
- Oh, I see what you're saying. Gotcha. Sir MacMania GUN—[03:19 11 Aug 2009]
- One of the worst articles on the site. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Why yes ChiefjusticeDS 20:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:01, Aug 10
- At Last --Asahatter (annoy) 22:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Indubitably for, dear boy. I've watched this go from contender to champion. Guybles CUN 22:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- For --Staircase CUNt 00:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- now this is more like it, i like it alot lol --
 Roman Dog Bird  02:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Sir MacMania GUN—[13:30 10 Aug 2009]
For. 
04:48, Aug 11 04:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)