Uncyclopedia:VFH/Literary dedications(2)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Literary dedications (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Literary dedications	Score: 15 Literary dedications
Nominated by:	Nomination - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:34, Dec 8
For: 15	N&4 -- Old QFA from OEJ. I really enjoyed it, and I really don't know why it wasn't featured before. VOTE VOET VOT. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:34, Dec 8 For I dedicate this vote to <insert name here>     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   00:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)   For I remember when this was last nommed. I've always wanted to say that! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:39, Dec 9 Dig again --THINKER 01:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Yes Bassguy 06:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Fur --THE 14:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC) For A-fucking-gain -RAHB 05:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Foragain Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC) for. nice.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Under user is greedy (not that there's anything wrong with that). Shorter things have been featured, and that's not counting infamous stubs. By the way, I seem to remember OEJ saying that the opening quote is real, which makes it like twenty times funnier. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC) For I dedicate this vote to EugeneKay using the {{Username}} template ~Fag x FS Took me a minute to realize you actually dedicated that to me, and you weren't {{username}}'ing me back. I should have known, because one of my magical .js bits disables {{username}}. I dedicate this thanks to fag on behalf of <insert name here>     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   20:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)   For--Æ 19:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC) For--MNM5150 01:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC) For Well I voted for this last time, so I will do the same now. MrN 23:23, Dec 22  For. --General Insineratehymn 02:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Abstain. I think I recall voting against last time, on the grounds of wanting more. I still do - it's good, but I wants moar, dammit. But what's there is quality, and maybe I'm just greedy, so here is where I'll sit. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Against Just to balance things out because EugeneKay voted twice. --Dallasallad 22:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.