Uncyclopedia:VFH/James Watt

Article: James Watt	Score: 2 engineering puns
Nominated by:	TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
For: 7	Nom + For. This article's full of hot air, and really builds up steam towards the end. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. Not the greatest bio page, but I do like the final conversation -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 23:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Watt? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:51, Aug 7 James? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Weak For. mainly for the final conversation. Bio could be better (but it could also be alot worse.) Mn-z 05:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC) For. With all due respect Staircase my man, you're kinda dumb. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:47, 8 Aug Wat dose dumb mean ~ Readmesoon 01:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Yeah, i don't get it. Staircase CUN^t 01:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Apparently, the Carnot cycle has nothing to do with this article. Weird!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 13:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against I didn't get any funny out of this. And I think it is safe to assume that the conversation was based from "Who's on First?" not the other way around. Seen it before, and the rest wasn't funny. Staircase CUN^t 01:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Against. Shortbread rations ! It starts off with a fake biography and then abruptly ends in a conversation with a bit of a too obvious joke about the name of the inventor. Where's the rest of the porridge ?. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 10:02, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Self-Against. Not developed to its full potential yet. Sir Mac Mania GUN— 13:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Also, fixed Romartus's vote numbering. Sir Mac Mania GUN— 13:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Against. Not enough detail. InMooseWeTrust 01:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Per Mac's self against...and yeah good start! Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Against*. If the author wants time to make it betterer, I say he gets it. But this is pretty tidy, so I look forward to seeing what else he wants to do with it. --UU - natter 10:20, Aug 11*
Comments	Just gonna quote this tidbit from Staircase's vote, for posterity: "I think it is safe to assume that the conversation was based from "Who's on First?" not the other way around" -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Well, such is the danger of being too subtle. Sir Mac Mania GUN—[16:12 9 Aug 2009] Comment. A good part of the bio is true; mostly the quotes are the only thing that's made up. Sir Mac Mania GUN— 13:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC) And why does the automatic vote recorder record comments with dots, and votes with numbers?! Sir Mac Mania GUN— 13:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Because comments are actually supposed to be dotted. My bad. Also, you're not supposed to put spaces BEFORE punctuation. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)