| Article: I will never forget
|
Score: 12 kinds of bombs that sand-nigger is going to blow me up with today!
|
| Nominated by:
|
 FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 08:13, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 20
|
- Nom+Self For I did some touch-ups on it since it was peed on, gotten pretty decent responses to it, so I thought I'd give it a go on VFH. FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 08:13, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Subtle piece, but well worth the effort. -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- something something 9/11 —
 talk 10:36, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- For. subtle being the key word here. ~
 10:53, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Nice. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:02, 14 December 2009
- For. Pretty fucking subtle, right. Style
 Guide 13:44, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- For, although it would have been nice if the narrator's feelings about Muslims were made a bit clearer.
 pillow talk 18:00, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- For. 72.131.110.100 18:43, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Utterly taseless
 Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 00:39, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
 Completely offensive, so it has my vote, of course. Also, the ending seals it.  » DJ "Reaper of Fail" Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and even more obscure folk metal. Now in lime green! 04:01, December 15, 2009 (UTC)- For. The ending made the article. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!)
- Fucking sand-niggaz SIRE FREDDMOOSHA
 AMUSE ME • 16:11 • Tuesday, 15-12-2009
- Colin's mah nigga. Also, LOL dune-coons. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN17:54, 15 Dec
- For. Sir Shandon
 (Talk) (Trophy Room) 18:08, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Woody On Fire!
 Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:13, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 00:19, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah! - T.L.B.
 WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 00:55, Dec 17
- For. I was promised a free drinky. di Mario 20:41, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
- For. This article is at the least very useful, which you can't say about many articles. People can send it to each other. ~ Kakun · talk 21:31, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Hard for. LOLZ ~Formerly Annoying Crap 03:12, 18 December 2009
|
Against: 8
|
- Against (funny articles apparently, but I didn't personally find it that funny) --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 18:23, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Besides a careless (or is that clueless?) use of a photo of a Sikh , this doesn't work as an abusive rant article. It certainly isn't a VFH in my view.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:54, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. It was OK up until the rogue punchline at the end, which completely ruins it for me. In my view, there needs to be subtle clues that lead up to the punchline, some hint or double-meaning along the way we can go back to with the delight of having been taken for a ride and say "Oh! I could have known! It was only about a birthday all along!" As it is, unless I am missing it, it is completely rogue, and disserves the narrative. Sorry. --
 GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 20:44, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
- JESUS CHRIST, IT'S A LION! GET IN THE CAR! Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:01, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Nothing against first person articles, but saw the ending from the beginning and didn't find it funny. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:33, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Sorry, but I've seen a better racist rant on OptimusChris's talk page. And the whole happy birthday thing isn't really incorporated well. What Global Tourniquet says... --Matfen 12:22, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. IronLung 18:07, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
 Smite. I've kinda been on the edge for this one, but after rereading it, I'ma say naw.  Would you like a cookie, sir? 11:59,17December,2009- And I have already forgooooot!!! Pollacks did it
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:30, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Romartus - do you mind reading it again, this time with your brain on? Style Guide 19:02, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, if he read it again, he might notice that it's written in the first person, and apparently he only enjoys writing that uses a third-person-omniscient voice. pillow talk 19:08, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. I seriously pretend to hate drama but I have my limits. Sorry, everyone. I really have them. Style Guide 19:10, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- The reason I don't like rant pieces like this is that they are usually seriously unfunny. This is just another , unoriginal one in my view. I have liked first person narratives - the one that comes to mind was Todd's Kinsey's Hamster experiment story which is still one of the best articles written here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:30, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. I love it, but I'm not in love with it. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 08:12, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. I believe it lacks proper meat. Where's the beef? I mean, it's amusing, but it just lacks that proper nuance that's required for feature status. Maybe if it was more like the revolutionary AVATAR, I might have given it a more positive impression. -
kingkitty  ~Fuck you~
|
FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK!
Completely offensive, so it has my vote, of course. Also, the ending seals it. 
Smite. I've kinda been on the edge for this one, but after rereading it, I'ma say naw. 
Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 20:30, December 19, 2009 (UTC)