Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Host an emo pity party

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

HowTo:Host an emo pity party (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: HowTo:Host an emo pity party	Score: 5.5 Guests not planning to attend
Nominated by:	ChiefjusticeDS 22:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
For: 13.5	Nom+For Very amusing article that I am nomming after finishing the PEE on it, it's very good work, in my humble view and could definitely be front page material. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)  For. :P Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC) For. Me likey good time Joe. Plenty good two dollar. Pup t 05:56, 28/07/2009 for. i liked. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC) For Very emo in a funny way! |*RaiTei*| (talk) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC) For. I loved the article..It was a good read .. Very emo.. and I giggled a lot over it too – Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.64.86.208 (talk • contribs) Whatever. Nobody's going to read it anyway. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:02, 29 Jul For. Emos are weird, weird people. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:14, Jul 30 For. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 05:57, Jul. 31, 2009 For. It was pretty good, I especially liked the part where said person is looking out the window, "Oh. It's just the postman again." I noticed one little grammatical error, but other than that, it's pretty solid. Yoyoddd 00:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 06:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC) For. Just about. -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 16:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC) For. I liked it. -- —Mazaka (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 8	Against The introduction set it up nicely, but the rest was sort of a let down. It's a solid article, but I wouldn't call it feature-worthy. Also, I was a bit bugged by the fact that he/she skipped over step four. Staircase CUNt 22:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Feels too forced. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 19:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Against. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Per the above personages. Plus I am sooooo bored of emo-baiting. --UU - natter 10:14, Jul 30 Against. Emo's are depressed is not original as a theme, and this doesn't pull it off particularly well. Also, Tool are not emo. -- nail-biting Ape (vitiate) (Riot Porn) 02:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Per everyone else who voted against. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 14:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Against. per above, might have been better if it wasn't in 1st person. Mn-z 17:59, 3 August 2009(UTC)  Against.. Looks to me to be incomplete as it stops rather than ends. I also miss Step Four...would that have made a difference ? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Step 5 explains why step 4 is skipped Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 08:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Yes I did see that..Rule SIX .THERE'S NO RULE SIX. (apologies for the caps) style of joke. Or was it rule Five ?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC) What should come after waiting for guests to arrive if you are emo and not expecting them to arrive? That would just be dragging the joke out unecessarily. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 12:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments	No where in the article does it mention or imply that Tool is emo... But emos can also listen to Tool right? Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 03:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH