Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Stick Things in the Microwave Oven

Article: Why?:Stick Things in the Microwave Oven	Score: 4
Nominated by:	MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
For: 9	Nom and for MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Partial SelfFor. Because I promised Unknown user to share the credit for it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC) For the very amusing pictures in particular --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 21:16, 8 August 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC) For. A little sadistic, but that makes it funny. InMooseWeTrust 01:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC) For, since the author of the other one approved the ripoff. Also, it's funny. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC) For. If the ripping off is approved then fine. But pleeease fix the spelling! ChiefjusticeDS 20:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC) What spelling? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC) THE spelling, it isn't horrendous but there are some mistakes, this bothers me.--ChiefjusticeDS 17:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Weak for Still have my reservations, but if I ignored the original, then I'd enjoy this one... Pup t 20:55, 10/08/2009 For. Made me smile. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against I prefer this over it. ~ Readmesoon 01:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Against as per above. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:58, Aug 10 So you're voting against because you're of the opinion that a spork of a feature shouldn't be featured? Well, okay. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Against. Because it's pretty much redundant. The best ideas come from the other article, and there's not enough different about this to make it interesting to me. --UU - natter 10:58, Aug 11 Against Per UU.... Not this time for me. Sorry guys :( Mr N 17:26, Aug 11 Against. Nice concept, but it didn't do it for me. Sir Sunbeam ~~no u~~ F@H KUN 19:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. It's Ok and shows it has been worked on.I just don't think it is a VFH as some of the ideas do seem a bit familiar and putting hamsters in microwaves...well I think that joke has been around since the analogue days. If I change my mind it will be a for vote. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 22:17, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Um... have you guys read this at all? They're almost identical. ~ Readmesoon 01:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC) That's the point. To me. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC) I get someone making a blatant ripoff, but I don't thik it should be featured if so. It's like taking another article and replacing "Outlet" with "microwave". Pretty Unoriginal. ~ Readmesoon 01:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Yeah. Whatever. I just think you should come back to us, RMS. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC) My heart belongs to ?pedia now. ~ Readmesoon 01:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC) But that ass is still mine. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Ok, you got me there. ~ Readmesoon 01:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Damn right I do. /pulls out bottle of lube. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Comment.** Can you actually spork a parody? I'm wrestling with my conscience, as I think it has heehee factor, but I don't think that Robbie Williams doing a cover of Take That should be considered original work. But Johnny Cash covering Nine Inch Nails is, but that was well reinvented. Marilyn Manson did a good cover of tainted love, but then it was destroyed by some pop starlet... Internal struggle... reserving right to hold off on decision for a day or so. Pup t 05:36, 9/08/2009