Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Read A Book

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Why?:Read a Book (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Why?:Read a Book	Score: 17 Folks a readin'
Nominated by:
For: 17	Self Nom and For Two pee reviews later, Ape feels the time is right to nominate his article for featurehood. Narrating his own actions like a mental patient he begins to type "Self Nom and For Two pee reviews later, Ape feels the time is right..." -- furry Ape (bamboozle) (Riot Porn) 23:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC) For --THE 23:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Yes - Bassguy 10:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC) For, but it could use a solid conclusion. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer (missile ponies for everyone!) 22:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC) For --J.R. "Bob" Dobbs 01:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Weak for. Pretty good, although I agree with Kalir about the ending - it feels a little... flat. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC) For. I hope this article produces a new group of amateur literary critics. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 12:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC) F☭R, strong for. this article is awesome.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Weak For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) FOR Robertodole 18:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Dig though it could be constructed a little better, and be even funnier. If it doesn't make it to FA, I will THINKER this. --THINKER 04:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)  Reading is good. --General Insineratehymn 15:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 4our-Sorry I voted against. Too paranoid about my own VFH at the time.-- Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 02:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Four MrN 06:23, Dec 28 For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 09:54, Dec. 29, 2007 FOR --Ianlopez1115 19:16, December 29, 2007 (PHT) 11:16, December 16, 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Well, it's an awesome topic, but it was a bit weak in the jokes and organization departments for me to give it a go for a for.-- Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 02:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.