Uncyclopedia:VFH/Vortex

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Vortex (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Vortex	Score: 13 swirling toiletbowls
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:07, 2 November 2009
For: 17	Nom+For. A nice article by DrStrange. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:07, 2 November 2009 For • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 15:40, November 2, 2009 (UTC) For. Almost a little too sciency..but it leads to Star Crap...so understandable — H. Peebles - D - HS 00:40, November 3, 2009 (UTC) For. Underplayed humour but it works. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 08:10, November 3, 2009 (UTC) For. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:08, November 5, 2009 (UTC) For. I found it very well-written and uncyclopedic, but a little low on humour. Then I got sucked in at the end and found it very funny. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:20, November 6, 2009 (UTC) For. InMooseWeTrust 17:52, November 9, 2009 (UTC) For. MrN 05:13, Nov 14 For. The humor's in the curious validations of an absurd hypothesis.--    12:23, November 14, 2009 (UTC)  For.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   22:06, Sunday 15 November 2009   For. Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 09:21, November 26, 2009 (UTC) For. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:56, Nov. 29, 2009 For - What the crap was I thinking when I voted against? – Kip > Talk • Works •• 07:09, Dec. 5, 2009 For. Because I laughed. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:28, 5 Dec For. As per the againsts. Style  Guide 13:51, December 7, 2009 (UTC)  Bizzaro Against. ME LIKE! --Invincibleflamegruemaster 22:50, 12 7, 2009 For. 82.209.243.14 14:44, December 8, 2009 (UTC) For. 66.136.254.134 16:12, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 4	Against. I never laughed. This is almost a Wikipedia article, it's so dry. The only attempts at jokes I could see were passing Godzilla references. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 21:31, Nov 2 2009 Against. Just couldn't get into this one. It is vaguely amusing in places but, never seemed to get any better than that. ChiefjusticeDS 08:59, November 3, 2009 (UTC) against as per those other againsts. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:45, November 8, 2009 (UTC) Against. It's well written but not very funny. Black Flamingo 08:36, November 18, 2009 (UTC) Against - As per Gerrycheevers. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 06:52, Dec. 5, 2009
Comments	Comment: That was my first mainspace article so I went ahead and gussied it up a little this morning--    14:26, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.