Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Circular Saw

Article: HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Circular Saw	Score: -4 article concepts expanded upon
Nominated by:	Yes, this article is sporked from HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Chainsaw. THAT'S THE POINT EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)
For: 3	Self-Nom and For The successor to a great article EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 15:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Semi-Fore, although it's a knock-off of another article, it does make me laugh. :) - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 15:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Dig I like the spin-off concept. Its the Joanie Loves Chachi to our inherently sick Happy Days. And its also funny in and of itself, which helps greatly. --THINKER 06:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 7	Once is enough. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 21:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC) What he said--*Sir* Manforman 21:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Against - This is one of those jokes that's funny once, but never again. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC) That's a terribly argument against. I mean, have you seen your username? And don't tell me that it's different because... EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) Plagiarism is best left in 7th grade essays Weasel 3689 03:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC) You know what I think? I think You Are Gay. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 09:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Against. Successor? The same article again, more like. A new spin on the idea might be OK, but there's no point featuring the same joke twice when there are other new ideas worthy of feature. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Against — Nice graphics and blissfully short, but is it really worth upsetting all those readers who cut their own heads off when they tried it the first time it was featured? SmackBot 09:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Against I didn't find it at all funny. --Moneke 10:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments	I'll admit the idea isn't terribly original, but it is a very good continuation of a classic. See the talk pages for more. And yes, the idea to change the old one was community approved. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) Abstain As I stated before, I felt featuring the old one ruined the illusion of a stub. With the 'sequel', the idea that it "needs to be finished" works. It's probally best left unfeatured. -On the other hand, this could be good for Halloween. I'm going to have to give it some more thought. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC) For crying out loud, please vote for the wretched thing, otherwise he's going to be impossible to live with. Mrs Kay 09:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)