Uncyclopedia:VFH/Holiday Hawk

Article: Holiday Hawk	Score: -4
Nominated by:	Boisen 01:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
For: 4	This article was so freaking funny... as a result, I think it would look great on the front page. lol--Boisen 01:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Yes it was. I say it should be featured... DURING THE ACTUAL HOLIDAY SEASON. I'm guessing it would be a better fit for December, thats all.--Mannsvilla 02:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC) I had the same opinion on Easter Bunny. They didn't care. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works GO HAWK!!!--Glowla 04:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC) I'm just going along wiht this because I thought the article was funny.--Nedrow 05:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC) I want it to win, also. Its actaully great that its so irrelevent in August to have a featured article about a "Holiday hawk". --Cheeseoswegan 04:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Against: 8	Nay. Way, way too random. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Nope. As Tkf, but with an extra "way". The namedropping doesn't help. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC) AGAINST For the use of every obligatory name in existence, and being about as random as Foncezzz on cocaine. -RA HB 04:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Strong against. Remove the references to Chuck Norris, Bill Clinton, Paris Hilton, Elmo, Ted Kennedy, Oprah, Darth Vader, Sylvester Stallone, Tom Cruise, Dr. Phil, Mr. T, Rocky Balboa, and the images of the exploding head, the dancing horse headed guy, and "Shoop Da Woop," and maybe I'll change it to a regular against. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:03 Aug 28, 2007 Jesus this is retarded. And I rarely use the word retarded. I feel it to be a derogatory term. However, in this instance, I'll use it because indeed, this shit is retarded. --THINKER 07:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Strong Against. Seriously godawful. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Strong Against per standard procedure when several randoms vote for a crap article. I'm tossing up whether or not to put this on VFD when a spot becomes available, because I can't find anything in this article that is the slightest bit funny or relevant to the subject. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind. I'm against it and I nominated it for deletion.--Mannsvilla 15:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC) No, you didn't. You stuck a VFD template on it, which does nothing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 15:09 Aug 28, 2007