User talk:Joe9320/Archive 4

COMMENTS

Greetings.

It has come to my attention that you have recently voted for one or more of my articles on VFH. I don't recall what they were, and I don't know if the records are entirely accurate, so if you have received this message in error, you have my sincerest apologies.

Otherwise, thank you for your support in my quest to pretend that I am capable of writing. It is most appreciated.

This copy-pasted spam message is brought to you by: 1234 ~ 07:04, 13 March 2011

Seeing as no one will respond to me

I've decided to take this into my own hands, I'm going to move Dinosaur into mainspace at ten fourty-five EST tomorrow. Anyone who wants to make their final edits can do so within that time frame. Thanks. -- 14:52, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

I have important things to say, mothafucka... whoops

So, about the weekly competition... So, I just write so many articles as I can, right? Well, I think I got that one already, but is there any chance of that someone puts the construction-tag? I mean, if I write articles, I don`t want them to be annihilated. Just asked, Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 11:53, 20 April, 2011 (UTC)

You can call me "muthafucka". I don't mind. And if there is a chance, I would be getting Zombiebaron to inspect. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill | 12:38, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I got it already. Third time. So do we do the pages into userspace? Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 04:37, 26 April, 2011 (UTC)

Quemador

Hey duuuuuuuuuder...weve never chatted before. Im shabidoo. Just suggesting that you use Quemador instead of Fuminador (although fuminador sounds helarious). Friendly advice :) xx --ShabiDOO14:42, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

So... umm...

The weekly competition had started now? Or am I wrong? If it`s canceled again, whatever. I started it already. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 15:49, 3 May, 2011 (UTC)

So... umm... (pt.2)

I`m a bit sorry and I really apologise from you. For what, you ask, I answer, because I haven`t got so much time to write into the Weekly competition. I just... am too slow. Sorry. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 09:46, 6 May, 2011 (UTC)

Award from UN:REQ

This user created I Wanna Be the Guy, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested articles. You're welcome!

This user created Malaysia, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested articles. You're welcome!

Pantsless Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

I appreciate it, and stuff.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:54, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

---

Organising tournament

Joe...a few things to think about when organizing a tournament.

Is it a one category tournament or more? Is is going to last one day, one week, or more than one phase? Whats the theme? Are you really clear and concrete about it? Would people really want to do your tournament? Why? How is it judges? How many judges and how will they collectively decide the winner? When is it? Keep in mind there are atleast three other tournaments being thought about, two of which last two weeks each and one which lasts 24 hours.

(I suggest that you keep it as simple as possible ex. one category, one stage, simple concept)

Start a forum. Say what the tournament is...in a really short and clear way. Design a logo or ask magicman really nicely if he would do it for you. Put a place for people to sign up and for judges.

Anyways...thats one way to do it. If you have any more questions...let me know. --ShabiDOO 10:19, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyc Summer Extravaganza, here I come! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill | 11:12, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Joe. I took a look at your forum. Sounds pretty cool. I see youve put a lot of thought into it. Can I suggest a couple things: First...I think it very unlikely that you will find that many contestants. Even finding 10 will be difficult, unless you hype it up A LOT! And a five round competition is also really ambitious...as there is yet to be a multi-round competition this year, where the contestants actually turned out articles during all the rounds. You may find that getting 5 judges will also be pretty tricky (3 seems to work). My suggestion (pretty serious): Keep it to a max to three rounds, which even then you may find fleetig, better two rounds. The whole idea seems cool...one thing to think about...there has never been a team tournament (teams of two). Why not consider keeping it simple...like having two teams of four (1 round) or 4 teams of two (two rounds). Especially if its your first tournament, and since there hasnt really been any tournaments that have been pulled off so well in the last while. that being said, I think your energy and enthusiasm is cool, and the logo is cool and the name is super extra cool. Think about it. --ShabiDOO 09:05, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Joe...how are you? I like the enthusiasm you have. Could I make a couple more suggestions? You may consider letting as many teams as people like sign up (a team being atleast two people). You may have more success getting entrants. Three rounds sounds great! Good luck and let me know if you need anything. Ill definately help you out with the promotion or anything else you need. --ShabiDOO20:13, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

Joe...I decided to wait until September for Happy Monkey. If you want...Ill co host the tournament idea with you. Ive hosted a tournament online here before, and I have a lot of experience doing stuff like this in real life. If you like...we can talk about this stuff...on a userspace and try to get a nice tournament out of this. I like your idea/energy/spirit here. It can work. What do you think? --ShabiDOO 00:29, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Great...we can talk here --ShabiDOO 16:41, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Guidelines for Contest

Judging will be held every two weeks, for weeks 1-2, and 3-4. The max score possible for a team to get is 40.83, and the lowest being 2.45. The first two weeks, all teams write 2 articles, and at the end of the weeks, whoever we (TKF, Iwillkillyou333, and → L A B O R A T O R I E S) vote to be the two top teams will advance to the finals, which will be held during weeks 3-4. The winner of that is The Champion, and will probably get a nice badge or something. Because we all have to add up our votes, I will pass around a little rubric for that when I figure out what the max and min scores are. Look forward to Judging, → L A B O R A T O R I E S 23:41, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

NOTE!!!! I got it: Max score for teams is 122.49, and min score is 7.35. (That means scores will be presented like this: ?/122.49) → L A B O R A T O R I E S 23:41, July 13, 2011 (UTC) The above message is really actually only (lol) for clarification, as those were both sent to the other judges (Iwillkillyou333, and TKF).

Joe...what do you think about this judging criteria? --ShabiDOO 23:56, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

Tourament

Hey Joeeeeeeeeeee! I was just about to write you a message. A couple questions: 1. What do you think about the whole maximum score thing...do you think thats stupid or funny or both? 2. As for the titles of the 2 articles each round...I suggest that the team can discuss possible titles, even agree on possible titles, but aren't allowed to talk in any way about content or HOW they will write the article...until the tournament begins (via talk pages or chat). 3. I added room for more teams, do you have any problem with that? 4. I guess if there are 4 or 5 teams, then the top two teams progress, and if there are 6 or more teams, then the top 3 should progress. What do you think? 5. As for judging. The judges each give a score for each article and the teams score is based on those numbers added together (that would be 6. scores per team [3 judges x 2 articles]). Is that okay with you? 7. Do you like french toast? 8. Round 1 is from 1-15 of August? 9. Maybe...to make the second round more intense...we can reduce it to one week (which would also give other people with tournament ideas a chance to also start in August? What do you think? 10. We should ask Magicman to make the awards. He is very good at them. 11. I found 10 Russian Roubles in a cafe today. Do you want them? --ShabiDOO 06:44, July 16, 2011 (UTC)

Joe...

You're killin' me man. The stuff I sent out to the judges was (which is actually posted to your page too, up a little ways) max score= 40.83 NOT 42.83 WTF? and min score= 2.45, which is still the same. There were supposed to be 4 teams (but I'm ok with 6, but plz change the Admessage to 6-team not 7-team). Also... Your idea on telling us what the teams will be doing is good, but writing two decent articles in under a week may be hard for those teams who still have only one or two people. Please respond here with your thoughts. Thanks, → L A B O R A T O R I E S 22:11, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Aimsplode. You are one of our respected judges. And any help in terms of recruiting and other stuff is appreciated. If you have some suggestions...put it on the suggestion page I told you about. Your opinion about the amount of teams is nice to hear and if you have more suggestions...please put it on the suggestion page. The amount of teams and any other cirteria about the tourament is upto Joe and I based on the feedback from others and what we agree on. THE MORE TEAMS THE BETTER! Two articles is fine...its a competition...a team can pull off two areticle. Please put your ideas on that page, and not on the forum page or other peoples talk pages. --ShabiDOO 22:16, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

....Anyway, Joe, thanks for replying. If you are absolutely sure there will be only six teams, then the admin message (top of your page) needs to be changed from 7 to 6. I have done the math: The maximum score is now 128.49 (42.83 X 3), and the minimum score is still 7.35 (2.45 X 3). I am perfectly fine with the two articles a week idea if you are too. Again, please reply here, and remember, change that admin message!! (Plus, how do you like my new sig?) ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 15:26, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Hey Joe...I dont know why you left the message on Aimslodes talkpage...he is a judge, not an organizer. If you want him to be an organizer instead of a Judge, let me know and Ill gladly become a judge instead and the two of you can deal with the rest of the tournament. Just clear that up okay? --ShabiDOO 15:51, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

This guy just keeps coming back!! -gets out strike-through template-.. Now listen up, Shabi. I'm helping your cause, so you should be happy. I wouldn't mind becoming an organizer AND judge, because then I could make sure everything goes fairly and as planned. Remember to reply here. Thanks, ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 18:07, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Dude...two organizers are more than enough. So...honestly, go ahead and choose...do you want to switch with me? I wouldn't mind at all...but for the love of god you are driving me totally crazy being both. Seriously. for the love of god could you please choose? Judge or organizer...and Ill happily go along with whatever you chose. One last thing, you dont go around striking out entire texts of people on their talk pages. Its not funny. --ShabiDOO 18:15, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

You're only making me want to strike you out even more. This is Joe's page, not yours, so shut up. Let Joe decide. If he will let me be both an organizer and a judge, deal with it. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 18:39, July 18, 2011 (UTC) ...And BTW: If two organizers are more than enough, why are you still here? ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 18:41, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Aimslode...you are being a total dick. Joe...you can work with this guy okay? I'm going to sign up for the tournament instead. Have fun and good luck with the tournament. It's going to be a lot of fun.--ShabiDOO 18:43, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Nobody said you have to leave. We want you as an organizer. I want you as an organizer. You are good great awesome supremely superb in excellency in your job as an organizer. Please stay. Seriously. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 18:48, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

-Sigh- Seeing as that you have rejected my offer, I will step up in you're place as Co-Host. IF you would like your position back, please tell me at once, and it will be relinquished. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 18:53, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

No...I really look forward to participating in the competition and Im sure the two of you will have fun running the tournament and I'm just not enjoying things the way they are going the last couple days. Good luck. --ShabiDOO 18:54, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Neither one of us is happy the ways things were headed the past few days, especially me. I have a deep hatred for arguing, exclusively with people who I enjoy working with. Good look, Shabi, I sense you will do well. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 19:01, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

paciencia, paciencia...dios pfv dame mucha paciencia. --ShabiDOO 19:32, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

I took three years of high school spanish. God does not need to give you patience. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 19:55, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

entonces deja con las putas tonterias y trata a tus compañeros bien, y no molestes a la gente así, especialmente a lolipop. Es una paginaweb d humor, no d gilipollas. Es nada gracioso tu comportamiento chicarron --ShabiDOO 20:13, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Es hora de mostrar a alguien el jefe whos. No me lío con nadie. Me dijo Lolli desordenado mi sig, y eso es todo. Por cierto, estoy retracción mi amable ofrecimiento de lo que le permite volver a ser uno de los organizadores, lo que significa que estoy en completo control. O bien ser bueno, o se pierden. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 22:59, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Okay...its hard to be sure what you are trying to say there, but you are basically saying "Im the boss and its time to recognise who is in complete control of everything", right? Beautiful. --ShabiDOO04:16, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Fantasy Football 2011

It's back! Go here and sign up. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:11, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Talk to me here

Hey Joe. Tell me who's making the Adminmessages please, because they haven't been correct once. Now that Shabidoo stepped down to become a contestant, I stepped up and am now a co host as well a judge, and have made some slight modifications to the USE page. Contact me here if you have the answer. Thanks, ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 15:31, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Tournament

Hi Joe, congrats on the Tournament popularity! Speaking of which, I was wondering if we could make teams of 4 persons. Say the teams could be 3 or 4, as opposed to the original 2 or 3. The challenge would even be greater, and it would suit us and Black Flamingo (and certainly others) who could not join in time. And it would produce the same amount of articles, therefore not overloading the judges. Waddya think? Thanks! Mattsnow 23:49, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Yes Joe...I suggest allowing Four people per team instead of 7 teams, as the judges will have less articles to judge and the teams will have more people to finish the two articles! --ShabiDOO 10:38, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

JESUS JOE!!!!!

I'm a co-host, too! Consult with me before you do things, please...remember, do that here. I was about to revert all the edits on the USE forum before I read this...jesus.. For the good tilt Mattsnow threw on it, technically it would be the same for the judges, because this is how I've outlined the scoring to work:

Each team only gets two scores, not one score for each of the contestants. The maximum score a single article can get is 128.49. The maximum score for the entire team (128.49 + 128.49=) is 256.98. The lowest possible score for an.... article is 2.45 ...team is (7.35 + 7.35=) 14.7.

Because that is the way I'm telling the judges to score the articles, it turns out that makes it is still the same just more complicated, but whatever. I'll add the "4. Optional" thing on all of the teams... ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 13:56, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

the reply to ur question

it be livin on mah talk page ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 19:37, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Alright

Here we go, Joe. The tournament is about to start, great job recruiting & creating this entire thing. I wish us luck with the rest of the tournament, and I can't wait to judge. I am going to officially close all teams tomorrow, okay? I gotta go for tonight, seeya tomorrow, the 30th. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 23:25, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

I want an answer to my question for NOW!!!

No, it`s allright, you can drink your... whatever you were drinking. Anyway. Will the articles of this oh so great tournament be on userspace or not in userspace? I`d like to start the competition from my teamtoday, which means I need answer. NOW. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 06:17 3 August 2011

Lacking a Judge

We only got two judges now; me and Aimsplode. TFK pulled out, and Shabidoo tooked his place but pulled out as well. So I was wondering if you're able to fill in that third spot, unless of course you change round two to have only two judges. ---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 05:41, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

I don't care what you say

You're the third judge. Get moving. ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 12:31, August 20, 2011 (UTC)

Tournament

Please judge the other two articles. Its not fair to the other team to give them 2nd place without reading them. Please. --ShabiDOO 16:12, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

Always

Always. --ShabiDOO 21:15, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Aristocrat's Judgery

Now the dust has settled on another exciting Turkey Day Ball competition its time for all those kind volunteers to set to judging. The results day is next saturday, the 10th December, so it should give everyone enough time to pick their winning entries, if you are not going to be able to complete in this time give us the heads up. Your results should be revealedhere. Thank you for your time... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

So, uh

What exactly is different with IC's format now that you're in charge, aside from changing "lobsterbacks" to "monks," thus completely missing the whole "Imperial Colonization" point? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:03, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

And when are you going to get the next colonization started? Since Why resigned, there have only been two colonizations completed. If it's going to work it has to have momentum. Pup 08:08 09 Dec '11

From my old talk page

I didn't get round to notifying anyone as a special thing, but have made mention of the whole shebang in the latest USP. There are a couple of new recruits who have added themselves to the new recruits thing- you might want to add them to the big board and notify them especially.

Oh - the reason why Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/project was created as the page to do the work was so that that would come up on people's watchlists whenever an edit was made. This would then act as a notifier to everyone and a regular reminder that something was happening. Hence I'd have that the page where any work on the rewrite of U2 would go.Pup 11:58 14 Dec '11

Forum on SOPA or SOPHIA or whatever

I've researched more, changed my response, and have a suggestion posted on the forum. Thanks for leading this. Aleister 12:33 5-1-'12

Have put up a new forum for a vote, it looks like wikipedia and other sites are going to do forms of blackout/information/shock templates on January 18th. 'Aleister 5:36 12-1-'12

Congratulations!

Our pro-SOPA day was great, and helped to save the congressional act from being struck down by wikipedia and those other commie bastions. Your project initiation and education, brave inspiration, and hard work has assured that the innernests will have the governmental control on them that they deserve. Nice! And thanks. Aleister 10:56 19-1-'12

Nah, I was just floundering on the forum, trying to herd cats, and what came together was Hyperbole coming in with some good language and Lytherya or whatever the name is putting up a fantastic template (the best I saw yesterday). Somehow we had code which wikipedia didn't have. You could get into wikipedia by using the stop button, but not here. L did better than them! Aleister11:19-1-'12

HMC

Joe...we keep crossing paths on the tournaments do we? Anyhoo...giving you a heads up on stuff now about judging:

• If you can, let me know in advance what you will base your score out of ten on (ex. humour, stupidity, images, bathroom humour, not taking it seriously)

• Give your mark out of ten after the deadline passes, and if you want to, also write a sentence or two about the article. If you do, please please please keep all comments constructive and avoid any attacks on the article or user (not that I think you will).

• You are so cool, the universe was created as a million galaxies of a googletrillion of particles to admire how cool you are.

--ShabiDOO 19:37, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

UotM

I don't care about who coded what four years ago, you are the deserving heir to this award, if not this month, then next, and if not then, soon! Yay Joe! Aleister 3:09 4-2-'12

Happy Monkey

Hey Joejoejoeyjoeyjojojo! Dont forget to email your topic to happymonkeycompetition@gmail.com

I look forward to seeing your article, whatever it is youll write on.

shabidoo

Judging

Time to get judging for the Happy Monkey Competition here, you have upto a week. Please give every article that was submitted a score out of 10 for whatever reason you so choose. If you like, you can leave a sentence or two on their pee review page (or more if you would like to) for each article, but its not mandatory. If you do, as I am saying to all the judges, please please please keep it positive (though by all means critique and point out what you don't like) and be extra encouraging to the nOObs. So then...thanks a million for agreeing to judge.--ShabiDOO 01:15, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Joey joe joe joey

How are you? Thanks a lot for getting all of your scores in. You left a couple marks in the next column...and so, it may be possible that you mixed up the marks that you wanted to give. Would you mind going over the list of marks, erasing out the ones you left in the other judges column (the purple ones) and making a quick check to make sure you gave the right mark to the right contestant? This would be so wonderfuly lovingly smilingly happily greatfuly appreciated! --ShabiDOO 12:17, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Score

Sorry, but can you explain your low mark for my article? I'm all ears. --Knucmo2 23:20, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

A formal thank you for liking my Happy Monkey article, for helping to keep the Happy Monkey contest flying through the treetops, and for having an awesome user page. Thanking you again "now", and again, "now". Aleister 11:47 20-2-'12

Scores

Joe...thanks for getting your scores in. Remember...you don't owe any explanation to any of the contestants as per why you scored them that way. Thoguh, if any of them ask you in a very friendly way for constructive criticism, Im sure you'd be happy to offer them it. Thanks for rockin the competition Joe joe joey. --ShabiDOO 21:03, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Proofreeding

Thanks for the review. I'm happy with the result, tbh. I have never considered this to be a contender for FA myself, but when I stumbled on the original I actually lolled because it was so bad, and I thought if I liked it, then others would too. Your feedback makes me feel that it's okay (although needs images), even though it's not brilliant. Which is as far as this concept would probably ever go. So in short, good review, good feedback, much appreciated. (Although I was tempted to go through and proofread the review just for the giggles.) Pup 11:37 23 Feb '12

Rejoice, Joe9320! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Thanks for the glowing review!

Puppy put in on VFH under another name, if you want to... you know, since it seems you like it and all! Bye! Mattsnow 17:34, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Pee Review

Hi Joe, thanks for taking the time to contribute to the Pee Review, it is always appreciated. Just a quick message regarding your recent work, the reviews have tended to be a bit on the short side and it is unlikely that they will be judged in-depth when they come to be checked in. This is just a request to try for a bit more length in your reviews, especially if you are scoring them under 30. If an article is scoring low there must be reason why not, and it seems only considerate that you attempt to set out how the person could solve the problem rather than just pointing out that it is there.

You can also try to be less blunt, saying things like "This could be your first failure" is not particularly encouraging to writers and you're going to end up getting into arguments with people before too long. Try to keep your tone encouraging and friendly at all times, you are on their side, you aren't trying to make fun of the problems or discourage them from making the article better. Take a look at some of Black flamingo11's reviews, or some of Puppy's if you aren't sure how your reviews should look. --ChiefjusticeXBox 23:38, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Hey Joey joey joe joe! How are you? I just saw TKF change his vote from "for" to "against" with the absurdly obnoxious excuse of "he voted for himself". This whole comments and voting against you nonsense is borderline cyber-bullying and you totally do not in any way (nor any user) deserve it. Some people find your brash comments a little grating, though I don't. Some users might prefer that you achieve some more "tangible results" but then, what has Lyrithya actually done in the last few days except insult people and post her opinion on talk pages and forums? I can imagine its a pretty sick feeling seeing people on a website trash talk you on what's supposed to be a fun forum...and I hope you don't take any of this badly. It is totally and utterly a reflection on them and their insecurities and need to belittle people on a comedy website...and nothing more. You are a fun presence on the wiki, and as people have said, the tangible results from you are more frequent and more useful. And no...I don't want to suck your c**k, just wanted to counterbalance the revolting dickishness here. --ShabiDOO 22:47, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Hi Joe

I just read the above statement and thought you might like to know that you're a dick. And yes... I do want to suck your cock, but you need to shower first. Pup 10:54 04 Mar '12

Who died and made you God?

That's my way of saying condolences congratulations condolences on being named HEAD of IC. By the way, POTR pee reviewed our Discordianism; I'll put a note on the IC page. (I say "our" even though I'm long dead; but if a pirate can't come back as a ghost, what can he come back as?) User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig10

Pee on your Goddess

The Imperial Colonization Discordianism has been Pee Reviewed. I have no authority anymore to tell anyone to do anything, but check it out anyway! Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Discordianism (2) User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig10 03:11, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Review tutorial

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ocelot. If this helps at all. Pup 07:59 05 Mar '12

Hey Joe

That's a song, I think. Hi! I really hope that you're not letting any of the stuff on UotM get you down like a dog. I find it weird and lots of kicking Rule 2 in the gut. My nom was sincere and imnho you deserve it for sure, and lots of other users think so as well. It's not a writing award, it's an award for jobs well done, and I think you know very well that you have often done good jobs here, the initiation of the SOPA protest as one of the best things I've seen you do. Anyway, wanted to come by and give you a cookie, but I ate all of them traveling over here, so I can at least tell you they were tasty. Enjoy!Aleister 1:52 7-3-'12

Amero is featured

Many thanks for your positive vote--Funnybony    14:57, Mar 17

The Pea Buddy Awards

WOW! A brand new UnNews competition and we need you! Either prepare yourself mentally for the severity of the trials (don't sign up just yet, you cheat!) or commit your soul as a judge right now. May the Lord shine his blessings upon thee! Mattsnow 00:48, March 20, 2012 (UTC)