Uncyclopedia:VFH/Rock and roll

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Rock and roll (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Rock and roll	Score: 2 inebriated "musicians"
Nominated by:	Style  Guide 18:30, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
For: 7	For. What the hell? Well, 25 000 + articles. Style  Guide 18:30, November 19, 2010 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:40, 19 November 2010 For. --ERpatient 01:43, November 20, 2010 (UTC) Weak For. I feel you could have gone for the jugular a bit more at parts but stil a noteworthy article. Dr. Fenwick 10:44, November 21, 2010 (UTC)  For. I actually snickered out loud, making this the best of the current selection - David Gerard 00:27, November 23, 2010 (UTC) Its been a long time... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)  For. Music snobbery getting in the way of a good article. See also: UN:DIY -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 09:04, November 27, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against. More ranty than funny to me. Don't see it as a feature as it is right now. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:41, November 21, 2010 (UTC)  Against. Main repetitive joke just gets tired much too quickly. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101122 - 19:54 (UTC) Against. Funnybony brings up the biggest humor arguments against this article very well so I won't restate all of them. But I will say at the very least at a page move is absolutely necessary: there is so much more you can do with this. Besides, this isn't even about Rock and Roll, nor is it about Estonia. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:11, November 27, 2010 (UTC) Against. Has anyone bothered to see the Wikipedia article on this subject? Is THIS the Uncyclopedia version of that? This is so pathetic it makes me ashamed of the human race. VFD is the right place for this. Funnybony    12:33, Nov 27 12:33, November 27, 2010 (UTC) Now that's just a plain insult towards the author. Get your grips together, Funnybony. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:53, 27 November 2010 No Socky, I have no idea about the author. Not a clue. But I know the subject, and this article is just a plain insult towards the subject.--Funnybony    15:20, Nov 27 Against. Nah - just not really funny or well done enough for the subject Sycamore (Talk) 13:01, November 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I was looking forward to reading this title. But quickly got bored of being told over and over, in every line, that Rock and Roll (the subject?) consists of stupid moronic talentless idiots. There seems to be little else to this piece besides bad attitude and bad mouthing. But “Rock ‘n’ Roll” is a big and important subject. THIS is what Uncyclopedia has to offer? Perhaps this article should be renamed “Rock Bands” or something, so the above named subject can be properly dealt with. Funnybony    22:09, Nov 19 22:09, November 19, 2010 (UTC) Comment. I took it to this page's talk page so I won't clutter this table. Style  Guide 06:58, November 20, 2010 (UTC) Another comment. Boys - widen your horizons a bit and you might find this a good article. Style  Guide 12:01, November 22, 2010 (UTC) One more comment. Oh man Lyrithya, you too... there's no "rant" or a "repetitive joke", but instead: THE. JOKE. IS. ON. THE. IMPLIED. AUTHOR. HIMSELF. But I guess that takes some experience to notice, so on a humour wiki front page it would be "meh". I think I'll vote against too. Style  Guide 12:00, November 23, 2010 (UTC) Maybe I just don't like rock and roll... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101123 - 12:05 (UTC) Comment. That would explain it. Style  Guide 13:53, November 23, 2010 (UTC) Comment. Well, if you decide to move the page, you could just as well delete it. There would be no humour left in it under another name. Let me try to explain the actual joke once more... Style  Guide 07:09, November 27, 2010 (UTC) Comment. Oh yes - and you can also leave this one alone and write an article called Rock and roll (music). Style  Guide 10:54, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH