Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hypocrites

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Hypocrites (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Hypocrites	Score: 14 Hypocritical votes
Nominated by:	Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
For: 14	Strong For I put a wee bit o' polish on one of InfiniteMonkey's gems. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC) VERY STRONG FOR this made me laugh —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC) For Definitely feature-worthy Ethereal 09:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Against To cast an ironic, misleading vote for this article would be immoral and deceitful – Kip > Talk • Works •• 13:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC) For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 13:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC) For --General Insineratehymn 22:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC) For. Yes. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC) against as per kip. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC) The depravity... -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 2:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC) For--Æ 22:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC) For Again, excellent work Enegma. --AmericanBastard 02:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC) Yeah ...seriously.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 19:46) For. One of my favourite philosophers. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.