Uncyclopedia:VFH/Elevator

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Elevator (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Elevator	Score: 18.5 insidious torture devices of the corporate world
Nominated by:	• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:07, Jan 27
For: 21	Self-Nom & For - OK, I wrote this article, I like it, so do three others, here, here, and especially here, hope you like it too! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:07, Jan 27 For. But they really are lifts 89.240.42.94 23:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Weak for. To be honest, I don't laugh very hard at this one. But it's kind of exactly what this site needs more of: articles about common everyday objects that parody Wikipedia really well. So I'ma go "for" on this. pillow talk 00:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC) For ascending to a higher plane of existence. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC) For. Per Hype - a good encyclopedic article. --UU - natter 11:24, Jan 28 For. Love the art, and the thought of Woodrow Wilson being tortured.--Procopius 15:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Weak For. --    22:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC) For. Per Hyperbole. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) For. Meh! Was just about to nominate, told you I'd do it! Not patient you heh! Anyway; me likes so it gets my vote.--kit 21:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)  For. Per Hyperbole. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC) For. Well-written. IronLung 07:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC) For Nicely offbeat --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 15:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)  13th floor, please. –72.193.236.89 06:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC) For. Funny! Sgtpanda 21:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)  Lulz.Saberwolf116 21:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)  lift!! --Greyweasel 09:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC) W♥v. I was once eaten by an Ikea elevator. That was one wild ride. I'll never forget it. Especially since the money from the lawsuit bought me this house. But the pain still lingers... —Sir SysRq (talk) 15:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC) yup yup yup. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)  They grow up so fast... *sniff* Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 15:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Weak 4 OrangeAipom 01:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC) For Good stuff. --Guildensternenstein 05:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2.5	Against. Gorhound 19:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Against. 86.40.183.141 19:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC) The concept lost me early on, didn't pick up. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain meh. And the medieval pic is highly anachronistic. Its showing what claims to be a 16th century invention in what is clearly 11th century style. Ok, the style (or something close to it) might have been in use up to the early 14th century, but still, that's 2 centuries off, at least --Mnbvcxz 18:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Well, excuuuuse me for not being able to get a Rennaissance-style elevator picture. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:00, Jan 28 Comment. Poo Vegetationlife 17:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Comment. I can't decide. This article is too long and rambling, but I got a lot of laughs from it. If someone would shorten it, I would vote for. Ryuinfinity 01:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.