Uncyclopedia:VFH/Dungeons & Dragons: Real Life Edition: Character Classes

Article: Dungeons & Dragons: Real Life Edition: Character Classes	Score: -1.5 non-racist hours spent playing this in your basement
Nominated by:	—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For: 4	Self-Nom & For. Yes, I know you're all probably tired of my never-ending string of self-nominated articles, BUT! this article faired a great deal better in PLS than its sister article did, and it doesn't have any potentially controversial racial humor. The other article did, and still garnered 8 For votes. I just want to see how this fairs. Pee review is here. Vote away. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC) Why? Do I keep voting for your articles Guildy? I hate you so much. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:35,1June,2009 For. per above. Mnb'z 08:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC) For But I also think that perhaps the overview should be featured instead. ^Dame 09:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5.5	I think the problem with the article is not the style/formatting or language but that it is too long as a front page feature for me. Also it reads more like a sub section of a bigger article as well. Or I just don't like dungeons and dragons. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 16:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC) I stick by my "feature the overview" statement for the sister. Tagstit talk contribs awards 22:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC) Against. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 05:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC) No Right now I see huuuuuuuuuuuuuge list while paragraphs on each would have waaaaay more room for humour. --Sir** DJ ~ Irreverent 13:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Against. Sorry, not feeling it. Rather listy. However, I think it's a great concept. Nameable ((talk?)) 16:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Against. because you can't put topics that were made up one day here see WP:MADEUP 4 details 71.135.57.215 03:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Do you still have the better one somewhere? *Style* *Guide* 18:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC) What do you mean? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC) Sorry, misread again. -- *Style* *Guide* 18:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Is there any way to put these all in a Category, and nominate that? It's like what Hype did with Category:My sojourn. I think this is very very good, but I agree that it feels like a subsection. I'll still most likely vote for, but this might help. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC) I like Woody's idea. Staircase CUN^t 20:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC) There's Dungeons & Dragons: Real Life Edition: Overview. If Guildy can summarize his classes and races articles in there, I'd say we feature that one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Now that's what you call a positive contribution. IronLung 00:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Author's Comment. Seeing as this whole "feature the Overview" idea seems to be popular, I think I'll finisih the other two articles I had planned for the "series", and then we'll try the whole "feature the Overview" thing. Just one question: would that count as one feature, or five features? There's kind of a difference. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC) How about just gathering the listy lists together into one concise, funny overview that can be featured? Subpages don't count as features anyway. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Hmm... Prolly should ask an admin...but my guess would be one, because I have seen Unbooks with many different branches being featured as the one article that connects them all. Those usually only get one feature. But is feature number a big deal for you? Tagstit talk contribs awards 03:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Are you just in it for the features? I thought writing was its own reward. In any case, Abstain per my comments on your other article's vfh nom. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 05:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC) No, I'm not just in it for the features! I was just curious as to how something like that would be handled, as I've never seen such a thing dealt with before. In any event, I plan on writing the two other planned articles in the fairly-near future, as well as revising the Overview accordingly. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:36, 2 June 2009 (UTC)