From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: A Series of Unfortunate Events
|
Score: 12 extremely stupid people who don't realise that this article belongs not here but in the dumpster outside. Shame on them!
|
| Nominated by:
|
EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:29, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 12
|
- According to the banner which... uh... disappeared a few hours ago... crap. Anyway, I might as well put this up. What happens happens right?
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:57, 18 May 2011- The 'Forementioned For Well done.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 16:34, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Niiiiiiiiiice.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  05:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- unFORtunately, I like this article. The books have a pathetic Gorey vibe about them and this is a horrible parody. I mean that in the best way possible, just sticking with the whole miserable theme. - Imrealized ...hmm? 07:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
- For. WICKED!!!!! DJ Mixerr 16:24, May 25, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
- For. Mimo&maxus 10:29, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Rather fitting, really. 1234 ~
 09:13, 29 May 2011
- For. But of course. --
 Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 17:46, 29 May 2011
- For. Funnybony
   19:42, May 29 19:42, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I remember this one...nice writer, great article. Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)
 22:48, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
- For. MrN
 02:21, May 31 02:21, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- Comment.
I don't get it at all. What is this? If someone can tell me what is funny here I might reconsider. But for now, abstain Okay, FA Quality Funnybony 06:32, May 19 06:32, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
- It's a very specific parody of the Unfortunate Events books, it might not make much sense if you aren't familiar with them.
--80.0.8.197 15:55, May 19, 2011 (UTC) OOPS, not logged in!--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:56, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Abstain Because I don't think this is feature-worthy yet. The style parody is spot-on, but that alone doesn't make the article funny. It needs to be more like the initial letter. The biggest dead section is the plot summary, but everything could use a few more jokes. The article is best when it's making reference to how self-important and ultimately ridiculous the actual series is, so if it had more of that, then it'd be a "for."~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 20:33, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I fixed it up a bit... is it any better?--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:22, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Just to point out, if this does get past VFH, I'll use the so-called text=something bit of this to change the text into something Lemony would write, eg What the dickory? It seems that some idiot put this article on VFH and it actually succeeded. Of course the obvious thing to do would be to put it on VFD, where it belongs for more than one reason, but no! All that fancy formating and incoherent rambling got the better of you, didn't it!
- Abstain. I didn't lol but then I am unfamiliar with the source material.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:11, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
For. 
