Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Save the mooses?

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Why?:Save the mooses? (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Why?:Save the mooses?	Score: 20 saved mooses
Nominated by:	– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:05 Dec 26, 2007
For: 21	Self-nom & for. I'm a bastard! (PR) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:05 Dec 26, 2007  For. - Mooses, the animal form of Moses? Think about that.....AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.A 14:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)  For. - great read --Æ 20:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)  Conditional for. Only if I get at least 15% of the credit for the feature. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)  For. - Just a funny article, gets me vote--Keysniper 23:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)  Okay, fine, as long as chocolate mousse is involved. --Vana 00:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)  For. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)  For. after some gentle persuasion, I have decided to vote FOR this article!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:43)  For. I was not threatened to make this vote. --Charitwo 06:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)  For. the unlikely event that EugeneKay writes HowTo:Dip a Kip. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 00:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC) For. After that uncharacteristically brief and enthusiastic review, how could I not? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 19:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)  For. --General Insineratehymn 16:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC) God dammit I really hate voting for "in-jokes" but this "in-joke" is actually a pretty good "joke" on its own, without the "in" being much of a necessity for "getting it." "Quotes." -RAHB 22:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)  For. - Heh, I like this one :P (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 5, 21:51  For. Saving the mooses --PET 00:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)  For. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)  For. - I know it's in-jokey but I loved the menu option... with SAVINGS! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 00:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)  For. I used to save whales once, but I converted to moose. Whales are just so...whaley. Moose are phat phun LOLOLO101010 -- di Mario 22:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)  For. ...with LOSSES! --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 22:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)  For. MrN 20:11, Jan 8  Strong For Let me tell you why to save the mooses. It because they are currently extinct in Kansas City. I hope it gets featured. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1	NO. --THINKER 21:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I'm not even gonna read it. I, uh, don't care about that one user that keeps popping up. I bet he wrote this himself. god, someone vote against   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 05:36) 8. hahahahha I started a runaway joke! Finally, people are starting to listen!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 06:15) Thinker: Any particular, like, reason, or something? The article hasn't got to do with Savethemooses at all, if you actually read. Don't judge an article by its title. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:18 Jan 06, 2008 I think that's why he voted against. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.