Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Save the mooses?

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Why?:Save the mooses?

Does it suck? If so, how much? Should I be shot, and if so, with what sort of gun? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:24 Aug 29, 2007

I'll have a go at this one, although by rights it should be STM. Still...

Humour:	8	Good stuff. Like the stuff about moose spirituality and the menu method in particular
Concept:	9	Inspired - where did you get that idea? ;-)
Prose and formatting:	8	Fine enough, although for me the lack of consistency with the pluralisation grates a tad (but I am the type that happens to). If you've started with Mooses, I think it would feel better to stick with Mooses as your plural throughout.
Images:	9	There are some, they fit, they work, they're fine. If I'm being picky, the steam powered moose doesn't quite look right (I know a steam powered moose isn't right, but the pic doesn't look, oh, you know...), but it's still fine.
Miscellaneous:	10	A møøse once bit my sister
Final Score:	44	Yeah, like it. Mind you, you should still be shot. With a gonne. But in a fleshy part where it will heal quickly. I've been watching too many violent films lately.
Reviewer:	--Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

I'll break the laws of grammar and go for Mooses throughout! Oh, and I'll have to see about that steam-powered moose. I get what you mean. It's supposed to be stupid-looking, which it is, but you're right, something's... off. Shame this thing can't be on VFH, everyone'll see it as a STM ego type thing. Bonus points for referencing Monty Python and Terry Pratchett in the same pee review. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:08 Sep 14, 2007