Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnScripts:A Nazi children's film (2nd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnScripts:A Nazi children's film (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnScripts:A Nazi children's film	Score: 4 people hailing Der Fuhrer
Nominated by:	Scofield & Dudes 13:40, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
For: 8	Shameless self-nom and for Oh what the hell. --Scofield & Dudes 13:39, August 10, 2011 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:00, 10 August 2011 For. Jmplayer 17:33, August 10, 2011 (UTC) For. AH! THAT'S BETTER. Only a smart person can take good advice. That's you. Funnybony    18:36, Aug 10 18:36, August 10, 2011 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:53, August 13, 2011 (UTC) Weak For. It's just okay. Dr. Fenwick 16:51, August 15, 2011 (UTC) For. My Favorite UnScripts article. —  (talk) (contributions) 17:28, August 15, 2011 (UTC)  For. Quite flunny. And the comment section on this nom should be nommed all by itself. Seig Scofield. Aleister 18:05 16-8-'11
Against: 4	Against. You didn't link to my Nazi article. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:14, 13 Aug Against per the guy. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:02, August 14, 2011 (UTC) WTF guys! That's not a good reason! --Scofield & Dudes 06:05, August 15, 2011 (UTC) Against. Funky Monk 02:51, August 20, 2011 (UTC) I wouldn't say it was quite "there" yet. Sorry. Black Flamingo 02:21, August 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I'll vote for this if you add the SLUG LINES. Now it just action and dialog with no shots (slug lines). If Hollywood wouldn't read it for this reason then neither will I. Add the slug lines and then it becomes feature worthy script. Funnybony    15:21, Aug 10 15:21, August 10, 2011 (UTC) Comment. You didn't have this problem last time! Ruddy perfectionist. Alright, I see what I can do. --Scofield & Dudes 17:43, August 10, 2011 (UTC) Comment. There. I added your slug lines. Happy? Scofield & Dudes 17:58, August 10, 2011 (UTC) Way to go. SLUG LINES SHOULD ALWAYS BE CAPS. So I fixed a couple 4 U. Now, don't you feel better? There is nothing like progress. We're never too good to learn more. Cheers!--Funnybony    18:39, Aug 10 Comment. Doesn't seem like a healthy environment at all for VFH noms, given how the votes have dried up in just two days. Scofield & Dudes 11:34, August 12, 2011 (UTC) Comment. "The Jews zap his mother and grandpa with something, turning them into retarded zombies" uninhibited creativity ShabiDOO 13:19, August 12, 2011 (UTC) @OptyCSucks What? --Scofield & Dudes 07:43, August 14, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. Sorry didn't lol but this is an interesting article all the same. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:30, August 14, 2011 (UTC) Comment. I remember asking the Against voters a question, and not receiving a proper answer. Can somebody explain to me what 21st Century Nazis has to do with my article not being Main Page material, or do I have to take this to the voters' talkpages? --Scofield & Dudes 11:57, August 16, 2011 (UTC) 19:14, August 13, 2011 Optimuschris (Talk | contribs | block) (Also, I did not lol) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:00, August 16, 2011 (UTC) I read something somewhere that has something to do with this, how'd it go? Something like "VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review." Now where did I see that again? -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:02, 16 Aug Comment. If you give me vague, insubstantial reasons for voting Against the article, I have every right to question them. The "discussion page" rule applies to situations where I ask for a detailed critique from voters. I'm not asking for that. I'm asking you to give convincing reasons for voting against, instead of referring to other featured articles I do not care about. Scofield & Dudes 10:43, August 17, 2011 (UTC) I'm not obligated to explain my vote to you or anyone else. I don't need a "good reason". I don't care how you feel about it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:03, 17 Aug Comment. Well, I still have the right to ask. And there's no reason to be rude. Scofield & Dudes 11:23, August 18, 2011 (UTC) Here Lies My hope of getting a second feature. Scofield & Dudes 13:56, August 23, 2011 (UTC) Hey you guys! I have the perfect solution! Scofield can add a link to 21st Century Nazis (because it's good or something) and the total VFH score will rise by 4! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:29, 27 August 2011 Comment. Why don't you just close the damn nom and give me a Pee Review? --Scofield & Dudes 12:16, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH