Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Shocking evidence of corruption in Washington lost because I forgot to take the lens cap off

UnNews:Shocking evidence of corruption in Washington lost because I forgot to take the lens cap off (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Shocking evidence of corruption in Washington lost because I forgot to take the lens cap off	Score: 2
Nominated by:
For: 7	Shut up. -- putrefying Ape (subtract) (Riot Porn) 22:57, July 1, 2010 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:03, 2 July 2010 For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:50, July 2, 2010 (UTC) For. —Pelozurian (talk) 08:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC) For. I say yes. -- S f 1 3 17:19 EST 5 July, 2010 Go forth Thought of this page during a news item on the oil, another sanitized one. Journalists know so much more than they tell, and the lenscap seemed to be a metaphor for that. So even if it's just a title and a pic, it works, but it also includes some good writing. Blacklisted news stories to come. Aleister 22:27 5 7 Metaphor? People around these parts actually consider less literal meanings of things? O__o ~ Lyrithya shifty eyes (words) (actions) -- 20100711 - 06:17 (UTC) For. It's nothing particularly special, but featurable nonetheless. -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 22:27, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against. Funny for a few seconds, then not so much. The article can pretty much just be replaced with the title. Che } 16:41,3July,2010 Against. Per Cheds. --UU - natter 10:12, Jul 5 Against. Don't you hate it when this happens? Wilytank 12:26, July 9, 2010 (UTC) Against... Anything with a title good enough to get my hopes up that then dashes them deserves a good thwacking with a spoon. Not a feature. Or does it? Meh. ~ Lyrithya shifty eyes (words) (actions) -- 20100711 - 06:17 (UTC) Against. as per TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:22, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. It's an idea that has been used before I am sure so needed an extra double twist followed by a dive to persuade me it was a feature. *RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 11:40, July 2, 2010 (UTC)