Uncyclopedia:VFH/Singapore

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Singapore (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Singapore	Score: 3 Lah!
Nominated by:	Bad Shroom 17:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
For: 8	For because I have a half-stake in its featuring and I vote with my shoes T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:30, 24 July 2009 (UTC)  For. With any luck someone in the Government of Singapore will see this and ask their internet service to ban uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Dutiful for. This is gonna fail so hard but I might as well show support for my IC brethren. -OptyC Sucks! CUN 20:42, 25 Jul For. Because I think it's good enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC) For. IC! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 15:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC) For--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 18:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC) For. This article is almost Wikipedia Featured Article quality. Almost... InMooseWeTrust 15:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)  Put this on lah! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 10:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against. I PEE reviewed it a while back and said it is far too laborious and complex to have front page appeal. ChiefjusticeDS 10:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC) Against. To be perfectly, insensitively honest, this really reminds me of a typical "random" article that happens to be gramatically correct. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC) against. we at IC certainly hacked a lot of the fat out of this article and at least made it decent, but it's certainly not featurable. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Per Gerry, Chief and Thinker. A big improvement by the IC types, but not great. --UU - natter 10:52, Jul 30 Against. Per above. Dame 12:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Wat. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:37, 23 Jul Abs. This is actually a fairly well-written article for one of it's scope in subject matter. However, due to the sweeping nature of the piece, it isn't very accessible. Also, the humor rooted in fact falls short for those unfamiliar with the country. Perhaps a trimming of the fat is in order. Either way, these types of articles are always a hard-sell. --THINKER 07:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC) meh too long and too little that is accessible to someone who doesn't really know the country for me to get into it. Pup t 01:36, 28/07/2009

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH