From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Hulk Hogan
|
Score: -4.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
Maniac1075 19:44, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 3
|
- sn+f Maniac1075 19:44, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For Love it.
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 11:15, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
 Cock I lol'd --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 20:31, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 7.5
|
- Against. This is significantly better than most wrestling articles, and that's a very good thing. But it still needs work to become a very good article. Take the advice from the pee on board to start with, and see how it goes. --UU - natter
 09:56, Apr 14
 Lovingly against A potential masterpiece which is now laden with run on sentences, too much of this/too little of that, and not enough use of the review advice. I laughed and laughed at parts of it. Needs polishing, make this the page that you really want to shine and others would be happy to run through it with you. Yay soon, but now, nay. Aleister in Chains 11:45 14 4 MMX- I basically agree with the people above. It's massively better than most wrestling articles, but it needs some serious polishing before it can be featured. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:40, 15 April 2010
- Against. Needs work - see the drop in box - and not sure it's really a feature anyway.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:58, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Against.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  15:15, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Against Nope 144.75.175.66 16:03, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Hulk Smash! -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 19:16, Apr. 16, 2010
- Against. Look at my pecs. They knock the Hulkster's into a cocked hat (whatever that is) Asahatter (annoy) 22:49, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
-
- Comment. This is an invalid nom I'm afraid, self-noms need a Pee review, and I cannot see one for this just yet, get yourself one then come back. ChiefjusticeGameBoy 19:46, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must receive at least one critique via Pee Review before nomination ->>(or at spend a week on Pee Review if you can't get anyone to look at it)<<- --Maniac1075 19:48, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Not up for discussion I'm afraid, one sure way to not get a review is to not submit the article to the queue. ChiefjusticeGameBoy 19:49, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah my mistake on the review front, I apologise. I'll try and get someone to do it for you, or I'll do it myself, as soon as humanly possible. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 19:51, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- thank you :) --Maniac1075 19:53, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Review Here. Iz nom valid yet? --Matfen 22:03, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Since it all happened so quickly that even the fastest admins couldn't invalidize it, I'll let it stand. Note, however, that next time this happens, I'll make the opposite conclusion, just to mess with people. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:10, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Cock I lol'd --—The preceding 
Lovingly against A potential masterpiece which is now laden with run on sentences, too much of this/too little of that, and not enough use of the review advice. I laughed and laughed at parts of it. Needs polishing, make this the page that you really want to shine and others would be happy to run through it with you. Yay soon, but now, nay. 
