Uncyclopedia:VFH/Bildungsroman

Article: Bildungsroman	Score: 4.5 comin' of age masterpieces
Nominated by:	Mhaille
For: 8	For, a work of comedic genius. Feature or be damned. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) For. Smart. --UU - natter 09:14, Aug 23 For. I don't get it, and I don't like Sycamore--Sycamore (Talk) 14:03, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Anything that takes jabs at Salinger is good in my book. Sir Mac Mania GUN—[14:05 23 Aug 2010] For. I've read this in the past (I read way too many pages here) and liked/like/likey it. ALeister 15:25 23 8 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:48, 23 August 2010 For. Sycamore has a crab like, sideways approach to stories that are indeed sometimes very quirky. It's a talent worth celebrating here with a vote in favour. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 07:32, August 26, 2010 (UTC) For. But there are some spots that might be neater my daddy thought walking. Style Guide** 17:58, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 3.5	Against. I don't want to be a grammar nazi here, but the comma splices and run-on sentences were so abundant that I felt like I had to struggle through every sentence like a child learning to read. pillow talk 00:10, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Against. 186.45.182.202 21:41, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Against. Same reason as Hyperbole, actually... run-on sentences, comma splices... and then sentence fragments that for no apparent reason, even have the transition words to make them part of the previous sentences, are cut off, and now I'm making a run-on sentence, too. Oh, glory day. But for the record, cramming two sentences together with a comma as the sole concatenating thingy does not proper longer syntax make. ~ sqlorsh (harass) (stalk) -- 20100826 - 23:44 (UTC) Hype. Nail on the head. A well-written, rereadable article needs to be, well, well-written. Aiming for labyrinthine sentence structures with intent to make your audience reconsider what they just saw seems extremely counterintuitive. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:36, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Hype, I've had a look through, and I admit I tend to like using longer syntax as is often used in older novels - this is just a preference, not an error. I write articles like these are not intended to be easy quick reads, but ones to be re-read.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:23, August 25, 2010 (UTC)