Uncyclopedia:VFH/Aristocrats (class)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Aristocrats (class) (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Aristocrats (class)	Score: 13 filthy aristocrats
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:13, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
For: 13.5	A gem from that 'crats competition that somehow never found its way over here. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:13, February 28, 2012 (UTC) For. Sycamore (Talk) 11:40, February 28, 2012 (UTC)  Flack Blamingo does it again! Aleister 13:35 28-2-'12  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:36, 28 February 2012  For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:54, February 28, 2012 (UTC) Cor. --Black Flamingo 14:54, February 29, 2012 (UTC) For. Sure Funnybony    16:44, Feb 29 16:44, February 29, 2012 (UTC) For. Its obscenity is what makes it so tenderly ingenious ShabiDOO 00:16, March 2, 2012 (UTC) For. Filthy. Filthy. Pup 11:20 02 Mar '12 23:20, March 2, 2012 (UTC) For. Absolutely disgusting, just like the movie. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:52, March 6, 2012 (UTC)  For. This joke. It never gets old. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:30 Mar 12, 2012 For. ChiefjusticeXBox 09:58, March 14, 2012 (UTC) For. MrN 19:51, Mar 16 The suggested obsession with self gratification during sex is very amusing, however not the same should be said with the obseesion of feacal matter. I am on the toilet writing this.For. 82.35.192.206 14:26, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 0.5	Against. 190.234.156.212 17:24, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.